780.1
BÜPFLSCPT
CH
CH
Art. 9 Legge federale del 18 marzo 2016 sulla sorveglianza della corrispondenza postale e del traffico delle telecomunicazioni (LSCPT) - Accesso al sistema di trattamento
LSCPT
Art. 9 LSCPT · Accesso al sistema di trattamento
Il Servizio consente all’autorità che ha disposto la sorveglianza o a quella che in seguito dirige il procedimento, nonché alle persone da esse designate, di accedere mediante procedura di richiamo ai dati raccolti in relazione al procedimento in questione e contenuti nel sistema di trattamento.
L’autorità di cui al capoverso 1 e le persone da essa designate hanno accesso ai dati fintanto che detta autorità è investita del procedimento.
Se rimette il procedimento a un’altra autorità o lo chiude, l’autorità di cui al capoverso 1 ne informa il Servizio. Gli comunica l’autorità cui ha rimesso il procedimento.
All’autorità che ne fa richiesta, i dati raccolti durante la sorveglianza sono trasmessi, possibilmente in modo criptato, su supporti di dati o documenti inviati per posta se: a. sono destinati a essere trasmessi a un’autorità estera nell’ambito di una procedura di assistenza giudiziaria internazionale; o b. per motivi tecnici non possono essere consultati mediante procedura di richiamo.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (17)
60/2005/2 · sh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BÜPF)
Admissibility of Incidental Findings in Administrative Proceedings Following Criminal Investigations
This provision regarding incidental findings in wiretaps was examined for analog application, but ultimately rejected by the majority.
P/3983/2008 · ge (art. 9 al. 1 let. a LSCPT)
Appellant v. State: Lawfulness of Real-Time Surveillance for Unrelated Offenses
Cited to justify the use of information discovered incidentally regarding drug trafficking, as the suspect was the same person authorized for surveillance.
P/3983/2008 · ge (art. 9 al. 2 LSCPT)
Appellant v. State: Lawfulness of Real-Time Surveillance for Unrelated Offenses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the conditions under which information concerning a different punishable act against the same suspect can be used.
P/3983/2008 · ge (art. 9 al. 3 LSCPT)
Appellant v. State: Lawfulness of Real-Time Surveillance for Unrelated Offenses
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the requirement for a posterior authorization if incidental findings concern a different suspect.
AC040127 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Appeal Granted Due to Refusal of On-Site Inspection
Cited in connection with the need for approval for random findings during surveillance, but the court deemed the issue to be governed by federal law regarding appellate review.
RBOG.2005.Nr.33 · tg (Art. 9 Abs. 2 und 3 BÜPF)
Employment Violation Case: Admissibility of Intermediate Finding Evidence
This provision was cited by the appellant as the basis for excluding evidence obtained from telephone surveillance, although the court ultimately found the secondary evidence (X's statement) admissible.
AC050018 · zh (Art. 9 des BG betreffend die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldverkehrs (BÜPF))
Appeal dismissed: bodily harm and extortion convictions upheld.
Cited as the governing law for the use of incidental findings from telephone monitoring.
TPF 2005 169 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Urgent Surveillance Requests: Incidental Findings and New Measures
This provision governs the use of intercepted information by third parties and requires prior authorization from the supervisory authority for further investigations based on such findings.
TPF 2006 217 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Legality of Foreign Surveillance Incidental Findings
Used to establish the condition that the legality of a foreign surveillance measure must be proven for the use of incidental findings.
TPF 2006 271 (Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit. a und b BÜPF)
Jurisdiction over Pretrial Detention Release Request
Defines the types of offenses for which individuals listed as suspects in a surveillance order are excluded from the general approval for using incidental findings.
TPF 2006 271 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Jurisdiction over Pretrial Detention Release Request
Governs the requirement to seek consent for the use of incidental findings for individuals not listed as suspects in a surveillance order.
TPF 2006 274 (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BÜPF)
Surveillance Findings: Use Against Listed vs. Unlisted Suspects
Used to allow the use of surveillance findings against suspect A. without prior approval from the authorizing authority.
TPF 2006 274 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Surveillance Findings: Use Against Listed vs. Unlisted Suspects
Used to grant approval for the use of surveillance findings against suspects C., D., E., and F. in their criminal proceedings.
SB150475 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit. a BÜPF)
Zurich Acquittal on Kidnapping/Secrecy Incitement, Conviction on Unemployment Insurance Violations
Cited in the reasoning to address the admissibility of evidence discovered during surveillance initially authorized for a different crime.
SB150475 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 3 BÜPF)
Zurich Acquittal on Kidnapping/Secrecy Incitement, Conviction on Unemployment Insurance Violations
Cited in the reasoning concerning the consequence of the collapse of the predicate offense (Katalogtat) on the admissibility of evidence regarding other crimes.