741.21
SSVOSROSSTR
CH
CH
Art. 106 Ordinanza del 5 settembre 1979 sulla segnaletica stradale (OSStr) - Opposizioni
OSStr; Capitolo 14: Esigenze generali in materia di segnaletica stradale
Art. 106 OSStr · Opposizioni
L’opposizione è ammessa: a. contro segnali e demarcazioni che non corrispondono alle prescrizioni, segnatamente quando sono stati utilizzati segnali o demarcazioni non previsti, sono stati collocati segnali o demarcazioni senza necessità, oppure mancano dove sono necessari; b. contro segnali che, giusta l’articolo 107 capoversi 1, 3 e 4 non devono essere né decisi né pubblicati nonché contro demarcazioni nella misura in cui è censurata la violazione delle premesse giuridiche del loro collocamento. L’opposizione è esclusa contro segnali e demarcazioni il cui collocamento è stato ordinato o autorizzato dalla Confederazione (art. 104 cpv. 3 e 4; art. 13 cpv. 2 SDR in relazione con l’art. 19 cpv. 1 lett. g e h).
...
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (24)
VVGE.1997.98.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 106 SSV)
Parking Fee Legality and Legal Basis Determination
Mentioned as the article under which objections can be raised against the placement of signals, but not for the fee itself.
VWBES.2024.236 · so (Art. 106 Abs. 1 lit. a SSV)
Property Owner v. Local Council Regarding Traffic Measures and Access Restriction
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1, 2.2) as the legal basis for the initial objection concerning the required road markings.
WBE.2024.320 · ag (Art. 106 lit. a SSV)
Cul-de-sac Parking Prohibition Upheld
This provision is cited to indicate that an objection (Einsprache) is permissible against non-compliant markings of traffic signs and lines.
V 2020 15 · zg (Art. 106 Abs. 1 SSV)
Appeal Against Municipal Traffic Order Establishing Core Lane Dismissed
This article, concerning the possibility of filing an objection (Einsprache), is discussed extensively, leading to the conclusion that the appellant's submission does not qualify as such (point 3.2).
VB.2017.00657 · zh (Art. 106 SSV)
Appeal Against Removal of Pedestrian Crossing Referred to Cantonal Police
Used to determine the correct procedure for appealing markings and signals that can be ordered without publication.
BRGE.II.Nr.0125.201 · zh (Art. 106 Abs. 1 SSV)
Appeal Regarding Speed Limit Reduction Jurisdiction Transfer
Cited in connection with § 31 KSigV to establish the possibility of appealing functional traffic restrictions to the competent authority (Kantonspolizei, and subsequently Sicherheitsdirektion).
603 2013 1 · fr (art. 106 OSR)
Administrative Court Upholds Traffic Modifications While Reclassifying Separate Bicycle Lane Challenge
The part of the appeal concerning the establishment of a cycle lane on Route Ste-Thérèse is transmitted to the DAEC as a request under this article.
U 2011 74 · gr (Art. 106 cpv. 1 lett. a OSStr)
Administrative Dispute Regarding Traffic Sign Installation at Road Intersection
Cited in the reasoning to define the grounds for opposition against signage (linked to the decision on the signage itself).
52.2006.53 · ti (art. 106 OSStr)
Resident v. Local Authority on Traffic Restrictions and Land Use Plan Compliance
Cited in the 'Per questi motivi' section, relevant for the overall legal framework, but not the direct ground for the specific orders.
52.2002.479 · ti (art. 106 OSStr)
Appeals Court Overrules Conditional Traffic Reversal Based on Unrelated Speed Limit Ruling
Cited in the preamble to the orders, relevant to the substantive traffic regulation issue decided.
GE.1999.0150 · vd (art. 106 al. 2 OSR)
Vineyard Signage Dispute: Retention of Existing Signs Granted, New Sign Denied
Cited in the final communication regarding the possibility of filing an appeal against the administrative decision.
GE.1997.0150 · vd (Art. 106 OSR)
Pedestrian Signal Configuration and Negative Priority Conflict
Cited as the formal basis for lodging the appeal concerning the traffic signals.
GE.1997.0150 · vd (Art. 106 al. 2 OSR)
Pedestrian Signal Configuration and Negative Priority Conflict
Cited to establish that the municipal decision could be appealed to the administrative court.
JAAC 63.55 (Art. 106 Abs. 1 Bst. a SSV)
Traffic Order Appeal: Construction Measures Not Functional Traffic Measures
Discussed and dismissed as irrelevant for the current appeal concerning the legal basis for imposing traffic measures.
GE.1996.0079 · vd (art. 106 OSR)
Municipality v. Cantonal Department Regarding Traffic Signage and Speed Limit
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the municipality's right to initiate action, but not used in the operative orders.