741.11
VRVOCRONC
CH
Art. 4 Ordinanza del 13 novembre 1962 sulle norme della circolazione stradale (ONC) - Velocità adeguata
ONC; Parte prima: Norme per i veicoli; Capo primo: Norme generali
Art. 4 ONC · Velocità adeguata
Il conducente deve circolare a una velocità che gli permetta di fermarsi nello spazio visibile; se l’incrocio con altri veicoli è difficile, egli deve poter fermarsi nella metà dello spazio visibile.
e 3 ...
...
Egli non deve senza motivi impellenti, circolare così lentamente da impedire un flusso uniforme del traffico.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (177)
P/23712/2020 · ge (art. 4 al. 1 OCR)
Truck Driver Negligence and Grievous Bodily Harm Conviction
Cited as a breached duty of prudence by the appellee regarding stopping distance relative to visibility.
SB230492 · zh (Art. 4 Abs. 1 VRV)
Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Qualified Traffic Violation
Cited alongside Art. 90 Abs. 3 SVG to define the factual basis for the conviction regarding the violation of the obligation to secure the vehicle.
SB230257 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 2 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 32 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 4 Abs. 1 VRV und Art. 27 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 4a Abs. 1 VRV)
Speeding Conviction Upheld, 15-Month Sentence Served
This is the main ground for the conviction, establishing the guilty verdict for the offense of gross violation of traffic regulations.
SK 2023 370 · be (Art. 4 Abs. 1 VRV)
Swiss Appellate Court Upholds Sentence for Multiple Traffic and Fraud Offenses Despite Incorrigibility Finding
Cited in the list of provisions used for the final sentencing decision (Abschnitt III).
AK.2024.106.AK · sg (Art. 4 VRV)
Prosecutor's Discontinuance Overturned Due to Lack of Procedural Authorization and Uninvestigated Accident Circumstances
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to keep speed such that one can stop within the visible distance.
P/7436/2023 · ge (art. 4 OCR)
Police Tribunal Upholds Penalty for Traffic Violations
This article was cited as part of the factual basis for the conviction (speed adaptation based on visibility).
P/9972/2023 · ge (art. 4 OCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld for Rear-End Collision on Ice
This article forms part of the explicit basis for the guilty verdict confirmed in the dispositive.
P/21671/2022 · ge (art. 4*a* OCR)
Moped Rider's Appeal Rejected in Negligent Injury Case Following Red Light Violation
Cited to explain the general speed limit in built-up areas.
SST.2022.129 · ag (Art. 4 Abs. 1 VRV)
Emergency Vehicle Driver Fined for Speeding and Failure to Yield
This article is cited as a basis for the conviction for not adapting speed to the circumstances.
SB210370 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 2 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 32 Abs. 1 SVG und Art. 4 Abs. 1 VRV, in Verbindung mit Art. 27 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 32 Abs. 2 SVG und Art. 4a Abs. 1 lit. b VRV sowie in Verbindung mit Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG)
Negligent Serious Bodily Harm and Drunken Driving Conviction Upheld; Weapons Charge Overturned on Appeal
The court found the defendant guilty of intentional (gross) violation of traffic regulations based on this combination of provisions.
P/14180/2018 · ge (art. 4 al. 1 OCR)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Negligent Harm Complaint in Traffic Accident
Cited regarding the rule that speed must allow stopping within the range of visibility.
STBER.2021.61 · so (Art. 4 Abs. 1 VRV)
Qualified Traffic Violation and Attempted Obstruction of Intoxication Test
Cited in the concluding section regarding the judgment, but the specific order does not detail its application.
VWBES.2020.325 · so (Art. 4 Abs. 1 Verkehrsregelnverordnung, VRV, SR 741.11)
Motorist Appeal of License Withdrawal for Lane Deviation in Curve
Cited in the reasoning to define the duty to stop if necessary or drive slowly, but not in the operative orders.
VB.2020.00808 · zh (Art. 4 Abs. I VRV)
Driving License Withdrawal Upheld for Gross Negligence in Traffic Offense
This provision is cited in the context of the factual assessment leading to the decision.
Jug.2021.76 · vd (Art. 4 al. 1 OCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Credibility of Testimony
Cited in the final orders as a provision establishing the underlying offense for which the appeal was rejected.