741.01 SVGLCRLCSTR

CH

Art. 3 Legge federale del 19 dicembre 1958 sulla circolazione stradale (LCStr)

LCStr; Titolo primo: Disposizioni generali; Competenza dei Cantoni e dei Comuni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (168 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 3 LCStr

La sovranità cantonale sulle strade è riservata nei limiti del diritto federale.

I Cantoni possono vietare, limitare o disciplinare la circolazione su determinate strade. Essi possono delegare tale competenza ai Comuni, riservato il ricorso a un’autorità cantonale.

La circolazione dei veicoli a motore e dei velocipedi sulle strade che non sono aperte al grande transito può essere vietata completamente o limitata temporaneamente; quella per il servizio della Confederazione rimane però permessa. ...

Altre limitazioni o prescrizioni possono essere emanate in quanto lo esigano la protezione degli abitanti o di altri ugualmente toccati dall’inquinamento fonico od atmosferico, l’eliminazione di svantaggi per i disabili, la sicurezza, l’alleviamento o la disciplina del traffico, la protezione della strada od altre condizioni locali. Per tali motivi, soprattutto nei quartieri d’abitazione può essere limitato il traffico e regolato specialmente il posteggio. I Comuni sono legittimati a ricorrere se, sul loro territorio, sono ordinate misure in materia di circolazione stradale. ...

Il diritto cantonale sancisce le misure per le altre categorie di veicoli e gli altri utenti della strada, in quanto non siano richieste per disciplinare la circolazione dei veicoli a motore e dei velocipedi.

In casi speciali, la polizia può prendere le misure richieste dalle circostanze, in particolare limitare o deviare temporaneamente la circolazione.

← Art. 2a LCStr Legge federale del 19 dicembre 1958 sulla circolazione stradale (LCStr) Art. 4 LCStr →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (652)

100 2020 65 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Bern Cantonal Court Upholds 30 km/h Speed Limit Reduction for Traffic Safety

Cited in the reasoning (E. 3.1) to classify the type of traffic restriction in dispute as a 'functional traffic restriction'.

60/2013/4 · sh (Art. 3 Abs. 3 SVG)

Government Council Decision Overturning Municipal Traffic Ban Remanded for Procedural Errors

Mentioned when discussing whether the decision concerns a total driving ban.

60/2013/4 · sh (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Government Council Decision Overturning Municipal Traffic Ban Remanded for Procedural Errors

Mentioned when discussing whether the decision concerns a functional traffic restriction where Cantonal autonomy is excluded.

VVGE.1971.75.Nr.117 · ow (Art. 3 SVG)

Cantonal Authority to Restrict Road Traffic Based on Legitimate Reasons

Cited as the basis for determining cantonal competence in issuing traffic restrictions.

VVGE.1981.82.Nr.33 · ow (Art. 3 Abs. 3 SVG)

Traffic Restrictions and Parking Fee on Mountain Road Upheld

Cited as the legal basis for issuing a general driving ban on roads not open to general transit.

VVGE.1981.82.Nr.33 · ow (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Traffic Restrictions and Parking Fee on Mountain Road Upheld

Cited as the legal basis for implementing functional traffic restrictions, such as parking bans, for reasons of traffic safety and facilitation.

VVGE.1981.82.Nr.33 · ow (Art. 3 Abs. 6 SVG)

Traffic Restrictions and Parking Fee on Mountain Road Upheld

Cited as the basis for previous temporary road closures when parking was full, prior to needing cantonal government approval for periodic restrictions.

VVGE.1997.98.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Parking Fee Legality and Legal Basis Determination

Used to explain that parking fees do not constitute a traffic measure according to this article, and that separate legal grounds are needed for them.

VVGE.2003.04.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Pedestrian Crossing Effectiveness and Desire Lines

Cited as the basis for cantonal powers to issue traffic restrictions and orders.

VB.2007.00177 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. IV SVG)

Property Owner Lacks Standing to Challenge Speed Limit Zone

The court implicitly referenced this provision as it deals with traffic regulations, which formed the subject matter of the dispute, although the final order primarily rests on procedural grounds regarding legitimacy.

VB.2005.00353 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. IV SVG)

Transport Companies v. Municipality on Road Traffic Restriction for Maintenance Deferral

The driving ban was judged to lack a sufficient legal basis under this article because it merely postponed necessary maintenance work for financial reasons.

VWBES.2005.300 · so (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Municipality Driving Ban on Forest Road Requires Proportionality Assessment Including Traffic Diversion Impact

The core of the decision relies on this article to determine the validity of the functional traffic measure (partial driving ban).

VB.2003.00304 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Traffic Order Challenge Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Merits

The case concerns a functional traffic order under this specific article, which forms the subject matter of the dispute.

JAAC 62.51 (Art. 3 Abs. 3 SVG)

Electric Vehicle Fee in Tourist Resort Upheld

This article was mentioned as a basis for restricting or prohibiting traffic on roads not open to general transit.

JAAC 62.51 (Art. 3 Abs. 4 SVG)

Electric Vehicle Fee in Tourist Resort Upheld

The court discussed that the planned fee could be considered a functional traffic measure under this provision, but questioned its compatibility with Article 37(2) BV.