Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
741.01 SVGLCRLCSTR CH

Art. 23 Legge federale del 19 dicembre 1958 sulla circolazione stradale (LCStr)

LCStr; Titolo secondo: Veicoli e conducenti; Capo terzo: Disposizioni comuni; Provvedimenti amministrativi: procedura e durata
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (168 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 23 LCStr

Il rifiuto e la revoca d’una licenza di circolazione o d’una licenza di condurre, come anche il divieto di circolare in velocipede o di condurre un veicolo a trazione animale devono essere notificati per iscritto all’interessato, con indicazione dei motivi. Di regola, prima della revoca della licenza di condurre e prima dell’assoggettamento a un divieto di circolare in velocipede o di condurre un veicolo a trazione animale, l’interessato deve essere sentito.

Un Cantone può proporre tali provvedimenti a quello competente, se viene a conoscenza di motivi che li giustificano: può parimente proporli alla Confederazione, se essa è competente.

Qualora un provvedimento contro un conducente sia in vigore da cinque anni, l’autorità del Cantone di domicilio, se ne è richiesta, prende una nuova decisione, in quanto l’interessato renda attendibile che i presupposti del provvedimento non esistono più. Se l’interessato ha cambiato domicilio, il Cantone che ha preso il provvedimento da revocare deve essere consultato.

← Art. 22 LCStr Legge federale del 19 dicembre 1958 sulla circolazione stradale (LCStr) Art. 24 LCStr →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (155)

WBE.2024.438 · ag (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
*R v. Smith* - License Revocation Overturned Due to Insufficient Factual Investigation
Cited as the statutory basis for the right to be heard in traffic law.
A/4198/2022 · ge (art. 23 al. 3 LCR)
Cantonal Vehicle Office v. Lower Court on Driver's License Recidivism Period Calculation
Cited to confirm the minimum duration of five years for the indefinite license withdrawal pronounced under Art. 16b al. 2 let. f LCR.
VWBES.2023.66 · so (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
Driver's License Revocation Upheld Due to Confirmed Cannabis Impairment
Cited in the facts section regarding the right to be heard before the final decision.
VWBES.2023.66 · so (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
Driver's License Revocation Upheld Due to Confirmed Cannabis Impairment
Cited in the reasoning as providing the right to be heard before the MFK issues its final decision.
WBE.2022.427 · ag (Art. 23 Abs. 3 SVG)
Driver's License Permanently Revoked After Falling Garden Chair
Sets the minimum duration of five years for the revocation of the driving license and the conditions for its reissuance.
52.2022.242 · ti (Art. 23 cpv. 1 LCStr)
Motorist Appeal of Mandatory Driving Ban for Repeat Speeding Upheld
Cited in the context of the applicant's right to be heard violation, although the violation itself was deemed cured.
603 2022 2 · fr (Art. 23 Abs. 3 SVG)
Administrative Commission v. Appellant Regarding Driver's License Revocation for Speeding and Recidivism
The court referred to this provision regarding the procedure for reapplying for a license after the five-year minimum period for an indefinite revocation.
A/3135/2021 · ge (art. 23 LCR)
Appeal Against Indefinite License Revocation Due to Medical Unfitness Upheld Despite Procedural Violation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard before a license withdrawal, though ultimately the court rejected the claim based on its reparability.
VB.2021.00165 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. III SVG)
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Due to Failure to Update Address
This provision was cited in the reasoning as the basis for the administrative measure, although the final order was based on non-admission.
CR.2021.0017 · vd (art. 23 al. 3 LCR)
Appeal Regarding Indefinite License Withdrawal Upheld Despite Medication Defense
This provision was used to confirm the decision regarding the conditions for the restitution of the driving license.
IV.2020.130 · sg (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
Appeal Regarding Midrange Speeding License Withdrawal Reduction
Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement for written opening and justification of the withdrawal decision, although not directly in the dispositive orders regarding the result.
V 2020 19 · zg (Art. 23 SVG)
License Revocation for Aggressive Driving Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw
Cited regarding the requirement to hear the party before withdrawal of the driving license.
CR.2020.0009 · vd (art. 23 al. 3 LCR)
Driving License Withdrawal Period Upheld for Repeat DUI Offender
Cited to affirm that the minimum duration for a definitive withdrawal cannot be reduced, thus justifying the rejection of the request for re-examination.
CDP.2019.209 · ne (Art. 23 al. 1 2e phrase LCR)
Driver License Withdrawal Over Sleep Apnea Test Results
The court analyzed the violation of the right to be heard, which is stipulated in this procedural rule, although it found the violation to be repaired.
IV.2018.126 · sg (Art. 23 Abs. 3 SVG)
License Withdrawal Recalculation Following Subsequent DUI-Related Offense
This provision dictates the five-year waiting period after which a measure can be reviewed, and its application was explicitly ruled upon in the amendment of the contested decision regarding the start date of this period.