711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
CH
Art. 53 Legge federale del 20 giugno 1930 sull'espropriazione (LEspr)
LEspr; Capo IV. Procedura di conciliazione; IV. Processo verbale ; V. Accordo nell’ambito della procedura di conciliazione
Art. 53 LEspr
Ove la procedura conduca ad un accordo delle parti sulle pretese d’indennità, il processo verbale ha lo stesso valore d’una decisione definitiva della commissione di stima.
Ove l’indennità fissata cagioni una perdita al titolare d’un diritto di pegno immobiliare, di un onere fondiario o di un usufrutto, l’accordo non spiega i suoi effetti a suo riguardo se non quando egli lo abbia firmato o sia mancato all’udienza di conciliazione. Il processo verbale deve ragguagliare su questo punto.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (19)
B.2016.58 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 1 EntG)
Rezoning as Compensable Material Expropriation
Used to determine that the matter is remanded to the pre-appellate body (Schätzungskommission) for setting the compensation.
B.2016.58 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 3 EntG)
Rezoning as Compensable Material Expropriation
Used to rule that the public entity (Gemeinwesen) bears the costs of the pre-appellate commission proceedings because material expropriation was established.
B.2016.58 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 1 EntG)
Rezoning Material Expropriation Compensation Determination
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedural step of remitting the case to the lower instance for compensation calculation, which implies application in the decision structure (remittal).
B.2016.58 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 3 EntG)
Rezoning Material Expropriation Compensation Determination
Cited in connection with attributing the costs of the prior commission proceedings to the defendant since the appeal was granted on the merits.
A-4873/2014 (Art. 53 Abs. 1 EntG)
Servitude Agreement Valid, Compensation for All Anchors Awarded
Cited regarding the legal effect of an agreement reached in conciliation proceedings.
20.2008.1.1 · ti (art. 53 cpv. 1 Lespr.)
Expropriation Compensation for Sidewalk Construction
Cited in the final order (Order 3) regarding the allocation of court fees and costs.
20.2008.4.5 · ti (art. 51, 52 e 53 Lespr.)
Cantonal Road Authority Expropriation and Anticipated Possession Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the application of articles for anticipated entry into possession, which underpins the ruling in order 2.
20.2008.6.5 · ti (Art. 53 Lespr.)
Expropriation Anticipated Entry Possession Dispute
Cited as applicable in conjunction with Art. 26 cpv. 3 Lstr. regarding early possession.
50.2007.5 · ti (art. 53 Lespr)
Municipality Expropriation Upheld Over Landowner's Access Challenge
Cited in the final decree's preamble, though no specific order directly applies its content beyond general procedural context.
10.2005.9.1 · ti (art. 53 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Sewage Easement Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited in the dispositive order 2.1 to make the provisional possession immediately enforceable.
10.2005.9.1 · ti (art. 53 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Sewage Easement Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited in the dispositive order 2.1 to state that the provisional possession granted is immediately enforceable.
10.2005.9.1 · ti (art. 53 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Sewage Easement Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited in the reasoning to state that provisional possession granted by the decision is immediately enforceable.
20.2004.32.1 · ti (art. 53 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Cantonal Road Widening Upheld Over Property Owner Objection
Cited in order 3, this provision confirms the immediate enforceability of the decision granting anticipatory possession.
50.1997.36 · ti (Art. 53 Lespr)
Property Owner v. Water Purification Consortium (Early Possession and Route Challenge)
Cited in the final list of applicable articles, but not explicitly used in the numbered orders (besides the general rejection).
50.1995.15 · ti (art. 53 Lespr)
Property Owners' Expropriation Appeal Moot Due to Settlement Agreement
Not cited.