711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
CH
Art. 37 Legge federale del 20 giugno 1930 sull'espropriazione (LEspr)
LEspr; Capo III. Procedura d’espropriazione ; III. Procedura indipendente d’espropriazione; 2. Diritti già esercitati
Art. 37 LEspr
In quanto il diritto da espropriare sia di fatto già esercitato, l’espropriante, dopo esserne venuto a conoscenza, deve chiedere all’autorità competente l’apertura di una procedura indipendente d’espropriazione.
In tali casi, anche l’espropriato può chiedere all’autorità competente l’apertura di una procedura indipendente d’espropriazione.
Le istanze e pretese in materia di espropriazione si prescrivono in cinque anni da quando l’espropriato è venuto a conoscenza dell’esercizio del diritto in questione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)
100 2013 170 · be (Art. 37 Abs. 3 EntG)
Owner Appeal Against Partial Expropriation for Bicycle Path Compensation and Scope Denial
Cited in the reasoning to explain that the Commission is not bound by party requests or related expert reports when setting compensation; this is reiterated for the administrative court using Art. 54 Abs. 2 EntG.
20.2008.7.1 · ti (art. 37 Lespr.)
Land Expropriation Compensation Dispute for Road Widening
Cited to establish that the question of creating vehicular access is outside the jurisdiction of the Expropriation Tribunal.
20.2005.41.1 · ti (art. 37 Lespr.)
Expropriation Indemnity for Traffic Mitigation Works
Cited when stating that granting dispensations or ordering noise barriers falls outside the court's competence (implicitly supporting the rejection of related claims in order No. 3).
50.2007.5 · ti (art. 37 Lespr)
Municipality Expropriation Upheld Over Landowner's Access Challenge
Cited in the final decree's preamble, related to the general procedural context of expropriation review.
50.1997.36 · ti (Art. 37 Lespr)
Property Owner v. Water Purification Consortium (Early Possession and Route Challenge)
Cited in the final list of applicable articles, but not explicitly used in the numbered orders (besides the general rejection).
10.2006.8 · ti (art. 37 Lespr.)
Expropriation Compensation for Road Widening and Building Land Value
Cited in passing in the reasoning (point 5) to state that the issue of building indices is outside the Tribunal's competence, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (which are the numbered points 1-4).
20.2006.55 · ti (art. 37 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Road Improvements and Residual Land Use Dispute
Cited as limiting the Tribunal's competence regarding the application of Art. 38 LE proposals.
50.2002.19 · ti (art. 37 Lespr)
Expropriation Compensation Claim Prescription and Exhaustion of Remedies
Cited in the final preamble, likely relevant to the subject matter context.
50.2002.22 · ti (art. 37 Lespr)
Cantonal Tribunal Upholds Early Possession for Road Improvement Expropriation
Cited as part of the general legal basis for the decision.
50.2007.5 · ti (art. 37 Lespr)
Expropriation of Land for Parking Lot Upheld Despite Owner's Claim for Vehicular Access
Cited in the legal provisions considered, although not explicitly used in the operative paragraphs 1-2 regarding the rejection or costs.