Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
711 ENTGLEXLEspr CH

Art. 119 Legge federale del 20 giugno 1930 sull'espropriazione (LEspr)

LEspr; Capo XI. Disposizioni transitorie e finali; I. Applicazione del diritto federale e di quello cantonale
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (120 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 119 LEspr

Ove un’espropriazione sia possibile tanto secondo il diritto federale quanto secondo quello cantonale, spetta all’espropriante di decidere secondo quale dei due diritti l’espropriazione debba aver luogo.

Se l’espropriazione è già stata concessa secondo il diritto cantonale, l’espropriante non può più invocare la presente legge.

← Art. 118 LEspr Legge federale del 20 giugno 1930 sull'espropriazione (LEspr) Art. 120 LEspr →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (9)

602 2021 153 · fr (art. 106 al. 1 et 2 CPC applicables par le renvoi de l'art. 119 al. 1 et 2 LEx)
Road Authority v. Expropriation Commission (Roundabout Compensation)
Basis for not charging procedure costs to the appellant who obtained substantial success.
602 2021 153 · fr (art. 119 al. 1 et 2 LEx)
Road Authority v. Expropriation Commission (Roundabout Compensation)
Cited via the application of CPC articles regarding procedure costs.
602 2022 196 · fr (Art. 119 al. 2 LEx/FR)
Expropriation for Lakeshore Path Servitude Upheld
Used to determine that the procedure costs are shared equally between the parties because the appeal was rejected in the context of expropriation proceedings.
602 2022 196 · fr (Art. 119 al. 3 LEx/FR)
Expropriation for Lakeshore Path Servitude Upheld
Used to determine that the procedure costs are shared equally between the parties because the appeal was rejected in the context of expropriation proceedings.
602 2022 197 · fr (art. 119 al. 2 LEx/FR)
Property Owners v. Municipality over Lakeside Footpath Expropriation
Cited to determine that procedural costs are shared equally between the parties during the appeal procedure.
602 2022 197 · fr (art. 119 al. 3 LEx/FR)
Property Owners v. Municipality over Lakeside Footpath Expropriation
Cited to establish that in appeal proceedings concerning expropriation, each party is individually responsible for half of the procedural costs.
A-3440/2012 (art. 119 cpv. 1 LEspr)
Expropriation Compensation for Railway Line: Appeal Dismissed
Referenced in the context of denying reimbursement for expert reports, arguing that the costs were not necessary.
602 2010 64 · fr (art. 119 al. 2 LEx)
Expropriation Appeal for Lakeside Path Servitude and Compensation for Loss of Privacy
Used as the basis for applying the rules on costs and legal fees (Art. 104 ss CPC).
2A 2007 76 · fr (Art. 119 al. 2 LEx)
State Entity Gravel Extraction Prohibition Compensation Claim Dismissed
Cited as the legal basis for allocating judicial costs and attorney's fees when an appeal is decided.