700 RPGLATLPT

CH

Art. 8 Legge federale del 22 giugno 1979 sulla pianificazione del territorio (LPT) - Contenuto minimo dei piani direttori

LPT; Titolo secondo: Misure pianificatorie; Capitolo 1: Piani direttori dei Cantoni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (56 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 8 LPT · Contenuto minimo dei piani direttori

Ogni Cantone elabora un piano direttore, nel quale definisce almeno: a. il suo sviluppo territoriale; b. le modalità di coordinamento delle attività d’incidenza territoriale in vista dello sviluppo che intende perseguire; c. i tempi e i mezzi previsti per l’attuazione.

I progetti con ripercussioni considerevoli sul territorio e sull’ambiente necessitano di una base nel piano direttore.

← Art. 7 LPT Legge federale del 22 giugno 1979 sulla pianificazione del territorio (LPT) - Scopi Art. 8a LPT →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (26)

BRGE.III.Nr.0129.20 · zh (Art. 8 RPG)

Textile Cleaning Facility Permit Appeal Regarding Spatial Plan and Railway Proximity

Cited in the reasoning to define the content of master plans, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.

RRB.2025.000061 · ag (Art. 8 RPG)

Zoning Revision Upheld Despite Conflict with Cantonal Development Plan

Cited as the basis for cantonal spatial development plans.

VB.2023.00035 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. II RPG)

Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended

The court applied this provision when considering the requirements for the location of projects.

B.2023.8 · sg (Art. 8 Abs. 2 RPG)

Cantonal Government Responsible for Waste Planning; Private Operator Lacks Standing for Specific Site Mandate

This provision, cited in the introductory list, relates to the need for comprehensive assessment when selecting disposal sites, relevant to the planning duties discussed.

R 2021 87 · gr (Art. 8, 8a, 15 und 38a RPG)

Nature Protection Organization v. Cantonal Government (Land-Use Plan Revision)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's argument about oversized building zones and the circumvention of reduction duties.

602 2022 209 · fr (Art. 8 al. 1 let. c LAT)

Appeal Rejection Regarding Building Density Index and Development Zone Extension Based on Accessibility and Cantonal Boundaries

Cited in the reasoning regarding the purpose of the cantonal master plan, but not in the operative part.

VB.2020.00080 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. II RPG)

Cable Car Project Development Plan and Water Concession Appeal

Cited implicitly as part of the planning principles considered in the weighing of interests which determined the outcome.

A1 21 131 · vs (Art. 8 Abs. 2 RPG)

Administrative Appeal Regarding Mountain Bike Track Approval and Expropriation

Cited in the context of projects with significant impacts requiring a land-use plan basis, but the court found this threshold not met.

90.2020.58 · ti (art. 8 LPT)

Taxpayers v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendment Validity)

Cited in conjunction with Art. 38a LPT as a requirement for the adaptation of cantonal master plans, which justifies the violation found regarding the new building area.

VB.2020.00876 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. 1 RPG)

Zoning Ordinance Prohibition of Off-Airport Parking Upheld

This provision is cited as a basis for the requirement of a master plan, which is relevant for coordinating significant spatial planning needs and environmental impacts.

TVR.2020.Nr.14 · tg (Art. 8 a RPG)

Application of Newly Approved Regional Plan to Pending Special Use Permit Review

Cited in connection with the analysis justifying the immediate application of the new cantonal master plan (KRP 2017) due to alignment with principles like high-quality inward development.

CDP.2018.359 · ne (Art. 8 LAT)

Property Co-owners v. Local Development Plan Reclassification Based on Heritage Protection

Cited in the context of aligning local planning with cantonal master plan guidelines.

AC.2017.0028 · vd (art. 8 LAT)

Building Permit Denial for Mixed-Use Facility in Artisan Zone

Cited in reasoning regarding cantonal master plans, but not used as a ground for the final order.

602 2015 114 · fr (Art. 8 ff. RPG)

Municipality v. Cantonal Directorate Regarding Local Development Plan Revision

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for each canton to create a development plan.

ADM 2016 15 · ju (art. 8 al. 2 LAT)

Quarry Approval Overturned Due to Outdated Master Plan

Cited as the basis for requiring projects with significant impacts on territory and environment to be foreseen in the master plan.