700
RPGLATLPT
CH
CH
Art. 33 Legge federale del 22 giugno 1979 sulla pianificazione del territorio (LPT) - Diritto cantonale
LPT; Titolo quinto: Protezione giuridica
Art. 33 LPT · Diritto cantonale
I piani d’utilizzazione sono pubblicati.
Il diritto cantonale prevede almeno un rimedio di diritto contro le decisioni e i piani di utilizzazione fondati sulla presente legge e sulle sue disposizioni di applicazione cantonali e federali.
Il diritto cantonale garantisce: a. la legittimazione a ricorrere, per lo meno nella stessa misura di quella prevista per il ricorso al Tribunale federale in materia di diritto pubblico; b. il riesame completo da parte di almeno una istanza.
Per l’impugnazione di decisioni pronunciate da autorità cantonali e alle quali è applicabile l’articolo 25 a capoverso 1, occorre prevedere autorità di ricorso uniche.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (679)
60/2020/1 · sh (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. b RPG)
Cantonal Council Zoning Decision Review and Remand for Comprehensive Compatibility Assessment
This article is cited in the reasoning to justify the court's full review (including appropriateness) when judging the appeal against the negative approval decision of the Governmental Council as the first and sole instance.
60/2004/5 · sh (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. a RPG)
Improperly Approved Modifications to Single-Family Homes and Consequential Setback Violations
Cited as the provision whose violation (lack of proper notification) renders the second project approval inadmissible and equivalent to a denial of the right to be heard.
VVGE.1978.80.Nr.19 · ow (Art. 33 RPG)
Government Council Review of Zoning Plans and Expediency
Cited to establish the cantonal obligation to provide at least one appeal instance for spatial planning decisions with full review.
VVGE.1981.82.Anhang · ow (Art. 33 Abs. 3 des Raumplanungsgesetzes (RPG))
Standing to Appeal Building Permits and Land-Use Decisions
This provision is cited in relation to the right of associations to appeal to the Federal Court.
VVGE.1983.84.Nr.43 · ow (Art. 33 Abs. 3 Bst. a RPG)
Municipality's Appeal Against Tourism Development Planning Zone Dismissed
Cited to establish the legitimacy of the municipality to appeal administrative court decisions regarding spatial planning.
VVGE.1991.92.Anhang · ow (Art. 33 RPG)
Right of Initiative in Cantonal Constitutional Law
This article is cited concerning the need for a cantonal legal remedies authority.
VVGE.1993.94.Nr.20 · ow (Art. 33 Abs. 1 RPG)
Landowner Denied Rezoning Due to Untimely Application and Improper Conditions
The court discussed the possibility for landowners to request zoning plan changes during public display periods.
VVGE.1995.96.Nr.36 · ow (Art. 33 Abs. 2 RPG)
Supervisory Board Complaint Dismissal and Third-Party Appeal Rights
Cited to explain the federal requirement for cantonal law to provide at least one appeal against decisions based on planning law.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.42 · ow (Art. 33 Abs. 4 RPG)
Appeal Admissible: Land-Use Plan Lacked Environmental and Spatial Assessment
Cited in relation to the coordination duty, emphasizing the need for uniform appeal instances for decisions to which Art. 25a Abs. 1 RPG applies.
VVGE.2011.13.Nr.24 · ow (Art. 33 Abs. 3 Bst. a RPG)
Preliminary Decision Invalidity Without Third-Party Protections
Cited as the legal basis for the fact that a non-third-party binding preliminary decision violates federal law.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0038.201 · zh (Art. 33 Abs. 4 RPG)
Facade Alteration Permit in Protected Area: Lack of Material Coordination
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for unified appeal instances when Art. 25a para. 1 RPG applies, which underpins the coordination issue.
BRGE.III.Nr.0129.20 · zh (Art. 33 Abs. 2 und 3 des Raumplanungsgesetzes [RPG])
Textile Cleaning Facility Permit Appeal Regarding Spatial Plan and Railway Proximity
Cited in the reasoning to state that the appeal authority of the FOT does not exclude the cantonal standing to appeal, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
AGVE.2008.56 · ag (Art. 33 Abs. 3 lit. a RPG)
Shooting Range Noise Challenge Dismissed for Lack of Standing
Used to determine that cantonal law must guarantee legitimacy at least to the same extent as federal law for appeals in public law matters to the Federal Supreme Court.
VB.2008.00123 · zh (Art. 33 RPG)
Municipal Assembly Resolution Challenge Regarding Building Boundaries and Right to Be Heard
This provision was considered in conjunction with Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV regarding the justification requirements for land use plans.
VB.2007.00312 · zh (Art. 33 Abs. IV RPG)
Jurisdiction Over Appeal of Cantonal Development Plan Including Demolition Permit
Cited in the context of federal planning law considerations influencing the interpretation of cantonal law.