700
RPGLATLPT
CH
CH
Art. 25a Legge federale del 22 giugno 1979 sulla pianificazione del territorio (LPT) - Principi della coordinazione
LPT; Titolo secondo: Misure pianificatorie; Capitolo 3: Piani di utilizzazione
Art. 25a LPT · Principi della coordinazione
Qualora la costruzione o la trasformazione di un edificio o di un impianto necessiti decisioni di più autorità, occorre designare un’autorità responsabile di garantire una coordinazione sufficiente.
L’autorità responsabile della coordinazione: a. può prendere le disposizioni necessarie per dirigere le procedure; b. vigila affinché tutti i documenti del fascicolo della domanda siano pubblicati contemporaneamente; c. raccoglie pareri circostanziati in merito al progetto presso tutte le autorità cantonali e federali che partecipano alla procedura; d. provvede alla concordanza materiale e se possibile alla notificazione comune o simultanea delle decisioni.
Le decisioni non devono contenere contraddizioni.
Questi principi sono applicabili per analogia alla procedura dei piani d’utilizzazione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (322)
BGE 151 II 918 (Art. 25a RPG)
Building permit outside building zone: municipal rejection without cantonal decision violates federal zoning-conformity jurisdiction and coordination duty.
Coordination duty violated because parallel municipal and cantonal competences were not materially and formally coordinated, forming a further ground for annulment.
60/2016/17 · sh (Art. 25a RPG)
Building Permit Appeal: Public Footpath Enclosure and Road Law Concession
The court cited this provision in relation to the coordination requirement breached by granting the special use concession in the building permit procedure.
VVGE.2001.02.Nr.18 · ow (Art. 25a RPG)
Shooting Range Renovation and Permit Requirements
Cited as the framework within which the assessment of the renovation project, encompassing both operational and structural measures, should fundamentally take place.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.42 · ow (Art. 25a RPG)
Appeal Admissible: Land-Use Plan Lacked Environmental and Spatial Assessment
Cited as the legal basis for the duty to coordinate, which was found to be violated due to insufficient environmental assessments in the zoning plan procedure.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0038.201 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Facade Alteration Permit in Protected Area: Lack of Material Coordination
The failure to fulfill the duty of substantive coordination, derived from this article, led to the annulment of the prior decisions.
VB.2007.00312 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Jurisdiction Over Appeal of Cantonal Development Plan Including Demolition Permit
Cited in the context of federal planning law considerations.
VB.2004.00558 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Traffic Regulation Speed Cushions Coordination Appeal
Although cited in the legal norms section, it does not appear to be explicitly used in the final orders regarding the appeal outcome.
VB.2005.00324 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Appeal Regarding Exception Permit for Temporary Open-Air Cinema on Agricultural Land
This article concerning building outside the building zone was considered relevant for the permit requirement.
VB.2005.00456 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Administrative Appeal on Lakeside Restaurant Permits and Environmental Standing
Cited in relation to the conformity of the restaurant building with zoning regulations.
VB.2007.00312 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Cantonal Development Plan Appeal Authority
This provision was cited in the section listing the applicable legal norms, even though its main application appears to be context setting regarding coordination.
A-3885/2023 (Art. 25a Abs. 1–3 RPG)
Federal Truck Stop Permit Overturned for Procedural Flaws
Cited for the principle of material and formal coordination of parallel approval procedures for construction projects.
A-3885/2023 (Art. 25a Abs. 4 RPG)
Federal Truck Stop Permit Overturned for Procedural Flaws
Cited for the principle of coordination of land-use planning procedures.
B.2024.100.B.2024.1 · sg (Art. 25a RPG)
Zoning Amendment and Permit Validity Regarding Watercourse Delineation
Although cited in the reasoning for context (E. 6.1, 9.1), this provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-5.
V 11 2023 · ai (Art. 25a RPG)
Unlawful Asymmetrical Watercourse Buffer Zone Designation Due to Inadequate Public Interest Balancing
The court addressed the appellant's claims regarding procedural coordination between different planning documents, citing this provision in the context of procedural objections.
VB.2024.00227 · zh (Art. 25a RPG)
Appeal Against Multi-Family House Permit Due to Traffic Safety and Fire Access Deficiencies
This provision is listed among the legal norms considered in the overall context leading to the final order.