Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
700 RPGLATLPT CH

Art. 24d Legge federale del 22 giugno 1979 sulla pianificazione del territorio (LPT) - Utilizzazione a scopi abitativi extra-agricoli, edifici e impianti degni di protezione

LPT; Titolo secondo: Misure pianificatorie; Capitolo 3: Piani di utilizzazione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (56 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 24d LPT · Utilizzazione a scopi abitativi extra-agricoli, edifici e impianti degni di protezione

In edifici abitativi agricoli, conservati nella loro sostanza, può essere autorizzata un’utilizzazione a scopi abitativi extra-agricoli.

...

Il cambiamento totale di destinazione di edifici e impianti degni di protezione può essere autorizzato se: a. sono stati sottoposti a protezione dall’autorità competente; e b. la loro conservazione a lungo termine non può essere assicurata in altro modo.

Le autorizzazioni secondo il presente articolo possono essere rilasciate soltanto se: a. l’edificio o l’impianto non è più necessario all’utilizzazione anteriore, si presta all’utilizzazione prevista e non comporta un edificio sostitutivo che non sia necessario; b. l’aspetto esterno e la struttura edilizia basilare restano sostanzialmente immutati; c. è necessaria tutt’al più una leggera estensione dell’urbanizzazione esistente e il finanziamento di tutti i costi d’infrastruttura, causati dal cambiamento completo di destinazione dell’edificio o dell’impianto, sono ribaltati sul proprietario; d. la coltivazione agricola dei terreni circostanti non è minacciata; e. non vi si oppongono interessi preponderanti.

← Art. 24c LPT Legge federale del 22 giugno 1979 sulla pianificazione del territorio (LPT) - Scopi Art. 24e LPT →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (127)

VB.2009.00010 · zh (Art. 24d Abs. Ibis RPG)
Horse Shelter Zoning Dispute and Demolition Order
The court cited this article when determining that the structure did not qualify as an 'ancillary facility' (Aussenanlage) for an exception permit.
A/3375/2023 · ge (art. 24d LAT)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Construction Permit for Agricultural Building Conversion and Restoration Order
Cited regarding the conditions for permitting a change of use for protected agricultural residential buildings, particularly concerning the maintenance of the external appearance (art. 24d al. 3 let. b LAT).
602 2023 38 · fr (art. 24d al. 2 et 3 LAT)
Building Permit Modification Denial and Right to Be Heard Violation
The appeal was admitted and the case was remanded for further instructions based on the conditions of this provision regarding the change of use of protected buildings.
RRB.Nr.2024.000939 · ag (Art. 24d Abs. 2 und 3 RPG)
Barn Demolition and Residential Construction Zoning Dispute
Cited as a basis for denying an exception permit, as the proposed construction of a residential building on an agricultural building is not permissible under these provisions.
III 2023 130 · sz (Art. 24d Abs. 2 und 3 RPG)
Farm Building Modernization vs. Cultural Preservation
Cited in reasoning (3.4.1) regarding the principle of economical land use, but not in the final operative part.
VWBES.2023.370 · so (Art. 24d Abs. 3 RPG)
Administrative Appeal Regarding Approval for Pony Enclosures Outside Building Zone
Implicitly used as the basis for granting the appeal regarding the fence, as the court found the previous rejection based on this article was not sufficiently justified by the lower authority.
60/2023/27 · sh (Art. 24d RPG)
Procedural Rulings on Appeal Deadlines and Material Worthiness Assessment for Protected Building Change of Use
Cited in the context of requirements for permitting the change of use of an agricultural building outside the building zone.
A/3506/2020 · ge (art. 24d al. 2 LAT)
Barn Conversion Permit Challenge Regarding Federal Agricultural Protection Requirements
The core issue subject to the Federal Tribunal's remand was whether the material protection conditions under this article were met, which necessitated the lower court's further instruction.
A/3506/2020 · ge (art. 24d al. 3 LAT)
Barn Conversion Permit Challenge Regarding Federal Agricultural Protection Requirements
The court notes that the lower court must verify if all cumulative conditions provided by this article are realized in light of the Federal Council's message.
A1 22 144 · vs (art. 24d al. 2 LAT)
ARE v. Cantonal Decision on Chalet Renovation Permit
The main ground for admitting the appeal was the lack of establishment of the material property-worthiness of the chalet required for a derogation under this article.
VB.2022.00145 · zh (Art. 24d Abs. 2 RPG)
Property owner's appeal for protected building change of use dismissed
Basis for allowing a change of use for protected buildings and structures outside building zones when their preservation cannot otherwise be ensured.
A1 22 142 · vs (art. 24d al. 2 LAT)
Federal Office v. Cantonal Council: Barn Conversion Permit Annulled Due to Insufficient Cultural Value Assessment
The appeal was admitted because the building was not deemed worthy of protection under this provision, leading to the annulment of the building permit.
A1 22 142 · vs (art. 24d al. 3 LAT)
Federal Office v. Cantonal Council: Barn Conversion Permit Annulled Due to Insufficient Cultural Value Assessment
The court concluded that since the prerequisite in art. 24d al. 2 LAT was not met, no derogating authorization could be granted under this provision.
AC.2021.0375 · vd (art. 24d al. 2 LAT)
Landscaping Removal Order Upheld Against Agricultural Preservation Standards
Invoked by the appellants in the reasoning section regarding building protection, but ultimately dismissed as inapplicable.
602 2022 193 · fr (Art. 24d Abs. 2 RPG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Farmhouse Conversion and Non-Agricultural Use
This provision, regarding the conditions for exceptional permits for changing the use of protected buildings outside building zones, forms the substantive ground for the decision to overturn the prior rulings and remand the case.