700.1 RPVOATOPT

CH

Art. 30 Ordinanza del 28 giugno 2000 sulla pianificazione del territorio (OPT) - Garanzia delle superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture

OPT; Capitolo 4: Superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (65 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 30 OPT · Garanzia delle superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture

I Cantoni badano che le superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture siano attribuite alle zone agricole; essi indicano le misure necessarie a tale scopo nei loro piani direttori.

Le superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture possono essere azzonate soltanto se: a. senza sfruttare tali zone, non è ragionevolmente possibile raggiungere un obiettivo importante anche dal punto di vista del Cantone; e b. viene garantito che le superfici sfruttate sono impiegate in modo ottimale secondo lo stato attuale delle conoscenze.

I Cantoni garantiscono che la quota dell’estensione totale minima delle superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture attribuita loro (art. 29) sia assicurata costantemente. Nella misura in cui tale quota non possa essere garantita fuori delle zone edificabili, essi designano zone di pianificazione (art. 27 LPT) per territori non urbanizzati situati in zone edificabili.

Onde garantire superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture in zone edificabili, il Consiglio federale può fissare zone d’utilizzazione transitorie (art. 37 LPT).

I Cantoni seguono le modifiche della situazione, dell’estensione e della qualità delle superfici per l’avvicendamento delle colture; essi comunicano le modifiche all’ARE almeno ogni quattro anni (art. 9 cpv. 1).

← Art. 29 OPT Ordinanza del 28 giugno 2000 sulla pianificazione del territorio (OPT) - Attività d’incidenza territoriale Art. 30a OPT →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (44)

VB.2006.00133 · zh (Art. 30 RPV)

Judicial Review of Municipal Zoning for Golf Course Development

Used to address the consequences of changes in the regional zoning plan during the appeal process.

VPB 04-2475-6277 (art. 30, al. 2, OAT)

Federal Council Approves Fribourg Master Plan with Modifications

Cited in relation to federal law requirements for the sustainable guarantee of the cantonal share of the minimum total area for cultivation.

VB.2006.00133 · zh (Art. 30 RPV)

Zoning Appeal Regarding Golf Course Construction Upheld

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms reviewed, concerning the scope of spatial planning.

ADM 2024 106 · ju (Art. 30 al. 1bis OAT)

Zoning Appeal: Football Field and Camping Site Reclassified, Residential Zones Upheld

This provision was directly applied to determine whether surfaces d'assolement could be classified as building zones, based on specific conditions and the importance of the objective.

ADM 2024 106 · ju (Art. 30 al. 1bis let. a OAT)

Zoning Appeal: Football Field and Camping Site Reclassified, Residential Zones Upheld

This was a key criterion for allowing surfaces d'assolement to be classified as building zones if an important objective could not be achieved otherwise.

ADM 2024 106 · ju (Art. 30 al. 1bis let. b OAT)

Zoning Appeal: Football Field and Camping Site Reclassified, Residential Zones Upheld

This was a key criterion for allowing surfaces d'assolement to be classified as building zones, requiring optimal use of the land.

BRGE.IV.Nr.0134.202 · zh (Art. 30 Abs. 2 RPV)

Rezoning for Sports Facility Overturned Due to Scope and Location Violations

Cited as requiring cantons to ensure the permanent maintenance of their share of cultivable land.

AC.2024.0098 · vd (Art. 30 al. 1 OAT)

Property Owner v. Municipality Zoning Revision

Used by the court to justify confirming the classification of the eastern part of the parcel in protected agricultural zone 16 LAT, in application of this provision concerning the classification of SDA in agricultural zones.

AC.2024.0321 · vd (art. 30 al. 1bis OAT)

Administrative Court Annuls Development Plan Approval Pending Municipal Reassessment of Arable Land Status

Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for the required interest balancing test the lower authority must perform upon remand.

7H 22 165 · lu (Art. 30 RPV)

Cantonal Rezoning of Building Land to Agricultural Use Upheld Against Owner Appeal

Mentioned in the context of protecting agricultural land.

AC.2020.0227 · vd (art. 30 OAT)

Appeal Against Neighborhood Development Plan Approval Based on Cultivable Land Status

The decision was annulled because the prerequisite interest balancing test under this article, required for classifying an SDA as building land, was not performed by the lower authorities.

TVR.2020.Nr.23 · tg (Art. 30 Abs. 2 RPV)

Appeal Against Cycle Path Approval on Agricultural Land

Cited in relation to the requirement that the canton's share of the minimum extent of FFF must be permanently maintained, a key factor in the interest balancing exercise.

AC.2018.0318 · vd (article 30 OAT)

Municipality v. Cantonal Department: Zoning Plan Approval, Land Availability, and Arable Land Rezoning

The court stated that the examination of the conditions under Art. 30 OAT regarding surfaces d'assolement (SDA) was unnecessary because the parcels in question were determined not to be SDA.

810.18.153 · bl (Art. 30 Abs. 1bis RPV)

Municipality Zoning Plan for Landscape Area: Residential Use and Protection Zones Litigation

Used to reject the proposed residential use in a special zone outside of building zones because it would improperly utilize agricultural land and was not essential for the canton's important objectives.

AC.2016.0354 · vd (art. 30 al. 1bis let. a OAT)

Property Owners v. Land Use Plan Approval (Agricultural Land Use)

The court found that the cumulative conditions of this article regarding the importance of the project were not met, contributing to the appeal's admission.