700.1
RPVOATOPT
CH
CH
Art. 3 Ordinanza del 28 giugno 2000 sulla pianificazione del territorio (OPT) - Ponderazione degli interessi
OPT; Capitolo 1: Disposizioni introduttive
Art. 3 OPT · Ponderazione degli interessi
Se dispongono di margini d’azione nell’adempimento e coordinamento dei compiti d’incidenza territoriale, le autorità ponderano i diversi interessi. In tale contesto: a. verificano gli interessi in causa; b. valutano gli interessi verificati considerandone in particolare la compatibilità con lo sviluppo territoriale auspicato e con le implicazioni possibili; c. tengono conto di tali interessi nel migliore modo possibile, sulla base della loro valutazione.
Nella motivazione delle decisioni esse presentano la ponderazione degli interessi.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (156)
BGE 134 II 217 (Art. 3 OPT)
Golf course conversion of prime crop-rotation land rejected for failure to weigh agricultural interests and SAC minimum quota loss.
Basis for annulling the governmental resolution approving the zoning amendment due to inadequate weighing of interests.
VPB du-8-avril-1992 (Art. 3 OAT)
Federal Council Decree on Minimum Agricultural Land Area and Cantonal Allocations
This provision is referenced regarding the justification for reducing arable land areas based on a balancing of interests.
AC.2024.0379 · vd (art. 2 et 3 OAT)
Appeal Dismissal Regarding Zoning Approval for Event Center and Road Development
Cited as planning principles to be respected during the review.
ADM 2024 106 · ju (Art. 3 OAT)
Zoning Appeal: Football Field and Camping Site Reclassified, Residential Zones Upheld
This provision mandates a comprehensive weighing of interests for decisions impacting spatial organization, which was applied by the court.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0134.202 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Rezoning for Sports Facility Overturned Due to Scope and Location Violations
Cited as requiring a comprehensive balancing of all private and public interests when cultivable land is used for non-agricultural purposes.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0100.010 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Appeal Against Residential Complex Permit Design and Tree Preservation
This article, concerning the required balancing of interests when exercising discretionary powers, was discussed in relation to the ISOS appeal, although ultimately the specific balancing by the ARE was deemed unnecessary for the required appeal review.
60/2023/29 · sh (Art. 3 RPV)
Bicycle Path Construction Deficiencies and Procedural Violations
Cited as the basis for comprehensive interest balancing, requiring the identification and weighing of all affected interests.
A/3620/2023 · ge (art. 3 al. 1 OAT)
Commune Gravel Extraction Appeal Rejected Over RIE Timing and Modifications
Applied as the legal basis for the requirement for authorities to weigh the interests involved when exercising their discretion in spatial planning matters.
VG.2024.00007 · gl (Art. 3 Abs. 1 RPV)
Drainage Tunnel Permit Upheld Despite Local Objections
Governs the interest balancing process, requiring authorities to identify, assess, and give due consideration to all relevant interests.
VB.2023.00035 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended
This provision was used by the court in its evaluation of spatial planning principles.
WBE.2023.76 · ag (Art. 3 RPV)
Historical Building Zoning Dispute Dismissed
Requires the balancing of interests in spatial planning decisions.
60/2021/27 · sh (Art. 3 RPV)
Land Use Rezoning Challenge: Balancing Public Interest in Green Space Preservation
Cited as the rule governing the requirement to identify, assess, and balance public and private interests in land use planning.
R 2021 87 · gr (Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. a, lit. b, lit. c RPV und Art. 3 Abs. 2 RPV)
Nature Protection Organization v. Cantonal Government (Land-Use Plan Revision)
Cited in the reasoning defining the legal requirements for the process of balancing interests in spatial planning.
R 2021 87 · gr (Art. 3 RPV)
Nature Protection Organization v. Cantonal Government (Land-Use Plan Revision)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's claim that the balancing of interests did not meet federal requirements.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0017.202 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. 1 RPV)
Cantonal Watercourse Protection Zone Appeal Regarding Riverbed Width and Harmonization
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of the duty to conduct an interest assessment, relevant to the dismissal of the main claim.