700.1 RPVOATOPT

CH

Art. 2 Ordinanza del 28 giugno 2000 sulla pianificazione del territorio (OPT) - Pianificazione e coordinazione di attività d’incidenza territoriale

OPT; Capitolo 1: Disposizioni introduttive

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (65 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 2 OPT · Pianificazione e coordinazione di attività d’incidenza territoriale

Quando si tratta di pianificare le attività d’incidenza territoriale, le autorità, in vista dello sviluppo territoriale auspicato, esaminano in particolare: a. quanto territorio è necessario per l’attività; b. quali alternative e varianti entrano in considerazione; c. se l’attività è compatibile con gli scopi e i principi della pianificazione del territorio; d. quali possibilità sono date di utilizzare il suolo in modo misurato e riguardoso dell’ambiente nonché di migliorare l’assetto dell’insediamento; e. se l’attività è compatibile con piani e prescrizioni vigenti di Confederazione, Cantoni, regioni e Comuni in merito all’utilizzazione del suolo, in particolare con i piani direttori e di utilizzazione.

Le autorità accertano le ripercussioni delle loro attività d’incidenza territoriale e provvedono tempestivamente all’informazione reciproca.

Esse coordinano le attività d’incidenza territoriale che si escludono, si intralciano, si condizionano o si completano a vicenda.

← Art. 1 OPT Ordinanza del 28 giugno 2000 sulla pianificazione del territorio (OPT) - Attività d’incidenza territoriale Art. 3 OPT →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (38)

VPB du-8-avril-1992 (Art. 2, 3e al., OAT)

Federal Council Decree on Minimum Agricultural Land Area and Cantonal Allocations

This provision is referenced in relation to the cantons' reporting duties to the Federal Office for Spatial Development.

AC.2024.0379 · vd (art. 2 et 3 OAT)

Appeal Dismissal Regarding Zoning Approval for Event Center and Road Development

Cited as planning principles to be respected during the review.

VB.2023.00035 · zh (Art. 2 Abs. I RPV)

Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended

The court applied this provision when considering the spatial planning framework.

B.2022.40 · sg (Art. 2 und 3 RPV)

Zoning Approval Upheld Despite Cultural Monument Concerns

These articles concerning planning principles were cited in the final order as not violated by the appealed decision.

B.2022.40 · sg (Art. 2 und 3 RPV)

Special Use Plan Approval Upheld Despite Tree Removal and Zoning Deviations near Cultural Monument

The court confirmed the legality of the zoning plan in relation to the cantonal planning principles after balancing interests.

AC.2021.0003 · vd (art. 2 et 3 OAT)

Land Use Reclassification Upheld Against Property Owner Challenge

These articles concern planning principles that the court verified were respected in the land-use plan.

B.2022.20 · sg (Art. 2 f. RPV)

Zoning Plan Legality Upheld for High-Rise Construction

Cited as criteria for weighing interests in land use planning, which the court found to be correctly applied by the lower instance.

A-7192/2018 (art. 2 al. 1 let. b OAT)

Railway Project Approval Upheld Despite Accessibility and Environmental Concerns

Requires authorities to examine possibilities and variants of solutions when planning activities affecting spatial organization.

AC.2017.0388 · vd (Art. 2 et 3 OAT)

Cantonal Reserve Upheld Despite Municipal Zoning Process

Cited in the reasoning regarding the general principles of planning, but not explicitly cited in the operative parts (I-IV).

2018.03.28.vv.2 · bl (Art. 2 Abs. 3 RPV)

Municipality v. Province: Groundwater Protection and Watercourse Designation

This provision mandates the coordination of spatial activities, and its violation was the ground for partially upholding the appeal, requiring the planning report to reflect groundwater protection concerns.

B.2015.71 · sg (Art. 2 und Art. 3 RPV)

Zoning Dispute: Green Zone Designation vs. Property Rights and Land Hoarding

Cited in the reasoning section concerning proportionality, but not in the final operative orders (1-3).

B.2014.107.und.weite · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 3 RPV)

Geissberg/Altenwegen Zoning Amendment Overturned Due to Lack of Changed Circumstances

Cited in E. 16 regarding the avoidance of mutual hindrance between planning of neighboring areas, relevant to the planning context.

B.2014.107.und.weitere · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 3 RPV)

Geissberg/Altenwegen Land-Use Plan Adjustment Over Traffic Limits Annulled

Used in the context of inter-municipal planning coordination, stating that mutual hindrances and contradictions should be avoided.

ADM 2014 34 · ju (Art. 2 al. 1 let. b OAT)

Annulment of Hotel Zoning Plan on Agricultural Land Due to Insufficient Justification and Environmental Concerns

The court used this article to assess the requirement for examining alternative solutions and variants for the project.

AC.2013.0494 · vd (art. 2 al. 1 let. b OAT)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Agricultural Release Zone Extension

Cited in the reasoning section when describing the necessity to examine different possibilities and variants during the legality check.