531 LVGLAP

CH

Art. 24 Legge federale del 17 giugno 2016 sull'approvvigionamento economico del Paese (LAP) - Diritto di separazione dalla massa

LAP; Capitolo 2: Misure preparatorie

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (66 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 24 LAP · Diritto di separazione dalla massa

Se assume gli obblighi contratti dal proprietario della scorta obbligatoria per beneficiare di un mutuo garantito (art. 20), la Confederazione o l’impresa terza diventa direttamente proprietaria della scorta obbligatoria e subentra nelle eventuali pretese di risarcimento del proprietario di tale scorta nel caso in cui: a. il proprietario della scorta obbligatoria sia dichiarato in fallimento; b. il fallimento sia differito conformemente agli articoli 725 a, 764, 820 o 903 del Codice delle obbligazioni o all’articolo 84 a del Codice civile ; o c. al proprietario della scorta obbligatoria sia stata concessa la moratoria concordataria o straordinaria.

Se, dedotte tutte le spese, il controvalore delle scorte obbligatorie o delle pretese di risarcimento nel momento del ritiro effettivo o alla fine della realizzazione è superiore all’importo che la Confederazione o l’impresa terza può esigere per il mutuo assunto, la Confederazione o l’impresa terza deve innanzitutto adempiere gli obblighi del proprietario della scorta obbligatoria verso il fondo di garanzia. L’eccedenza dev’essere versata alla massa fallimentare oppure, in caso di differimento del fallimento o di moratoria concordataria o straordinaria, al debitore.

Se, dedotte tutte le spese, non è interamente tacitata con le merci che ha ritirato o realizzato in virtù del proprio diritto di separazione dalla massa fallimentare, la Confederazione o l’impresa terza partecipa al fallimento o al concordato. In caso di differimento del fallimento o di moratoria straordinaria, essa vanta nei confronti del debitore un credito imprescrittibile e rimunerato d’interesse.

← Art. 23 LAP Legge federale del 17 giugno 2016 sull'approvvigionamento economico del Paese (LAP) - Oggetto e scopo Art. 25 LAP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (23)

U 2020 66 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 2 Lap)

Road Construction Tender Cancellation Upheld Due to Collusion Suspicion

Cited as the legal basis allowing the contracting authority to interrupt the award procedure for important reasons.

U 2020 66 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 3 lett. c Lap)

Road Construction Tender Cancellation Upheld Due to Collusion Suspicion

The court confirmed the decision to interrupt and repeat the tender procedures because the offers did not guarantee effective competition.

U 2021 74 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 2 Lap)

Appeals Concerning Voided Construction Tender Award

The court accepted appeal U 21 76 because the conditions for interrupting the procedure (important reasons) were not met, which is governed by this article.

U 2021 74 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 3 lett. d Lap)

Appeals Concerning Voided Construction Tender Award

This article, concerning modification of the required performance as a reason for procedure repetition, was cited in the discussion regarding the admissibility of appeal U 21 76.

U 2021 76 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 2 Lap)

Municipality Contract Award Challenge and Cancellation Overturned

The basis upon which the appeal against the termination/repetition of the procedure (U 21 76) was decided, leading to its acceptance.

U 2021 76 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 3 lett. d Lap)

Municipality Contract Award Challenge and Cancellation Overturned

Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions under which a procedure can be repeated due to essential modification of the service required.

U 2021 77 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 2 Lap)

Municipality's Tender Cancellation Overturned Due to Ambiguous Documentation

Cited as the basis for allowing the appeal and annulling the decision to interrupt the tendering procedure based on a lack of important reasons.

U 2021 77 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 3 lett. d Lap)

Municipality's Tender Cancellation Overturned Due to Ambiguous Documentation

Cited in the reasoning leading up to the decision regarding the conditions under which a procedure can be repeated.

U 2020 65 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 2 Lap)

Tender Cancellation Upheld Due to Cartel Suspicions

The court used this provision as the legal basis for justifying the decision to interrupt the award procedure due to important reasons (suspected anti-competitive agreements).

U 2020 65 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 3 lett. c Lap)

Tender Cancellation Upheld Due to Cartel Suspicions

The court referenced this provision in relation to the possibility of repeating the procedure if effective competition is not guaranteed, which occurs in cases of anti-competitive agreements.

U 2020 99 · gr (Art. 24 cpv. 2 Lap)

Administrative Court Upholds Tender Challenge Over Invalid Grounds for Cancellation

This provision allows the contracting authority to interrupt the awarding procedure for important reasons, which the court found to be lacking in this case.

U 2020 99 · gr (Art. 24 cpv. 3 lett. c Lap)

Administrative Court Upholds Tender Challenge Over Invalid Grounds for Cancellation

This provision, which allows for repetition if bids do not guarantee effective competition, was the basis for the disputed administrative decision which the court ultimately annulled.

200 2015 28 · be (art. 24 LAP)

Claimant v. Swiss Invalidity Insurance Office (Alopecia, Pain, and Work Capacity)

Not applicable, provision relates to appeal entitlement, not cited in OS.

U 2010 57 · gr (art. 24 cpv. 1 Lap)

Challenge to Public Works Contract Award Based on Procedural Defects

Although mentioned in the reasoning of the appeal by the second company, the text does not explicitly cite this article in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3). Therefore, it is excluded based on the rule.

A/3039/2008 · ge (Art. 24 al. 1 LAP)

Spousal Liability and Partial Remittance of Public Assistance Advance Reimbursement

This provision was the basis for partially admitting the request for debt forgiveness due to the beneficiary's good faith and difficult financial situation.