Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
455 TSCHGLPALPAN CH

Art. 2 Legge federale del 16 dicembre 2005 sulla protezione degli animali (LPAn) - Campo d’applicazione

LPAn; Capitolo 1: In generale
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (56 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 2 LPAn · Campo d’applicazione

La legge si applica ai vertebrati. Il Consiglio federale determina a quali invertebrati essa è pure applicabile e in quale misura. A tal fine si orienta ai ritrovati scientifici inerenti alla sensorialità degli invertebrati.

Sono fatte salve le leggi federali del 20 giugno 1986 sulla caccia, del 1° luglio 1966 sulla protezione della natura e del paesaggio, del 21 giugno 1991 sulla pesca, del 13 dicembre 2002 sulla formazione professionale e del 1° luglio 1966 sulle epizoozie.

← Art. 1 LPAn Legge federale del 16 dicembre 2005 sulla protezione degli animali (LPAn) - Scopo Art. 3 LPAn →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (27)

A/1449/2020 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Associate Professor v. University Faculty Committee (Gender Discrimination in Promotion Appeal Nomination)
The court found that the LEg overrides the exclusion of LPA applicability for promotions stipulated in this article when discrimination is alleged.
A/2076/2021 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Appeal Inadmissible: Probationary Promotion Non-Confirmation Not Challengeable Administrative Act
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the provisions of the LPA are not applicable to promotion procedures.
A/1979/2010 · ge (Art. 2 let. d LPA)
Employee v. City Regarding Salary and Job Classification
Cited implicitly when noting that an appeal against the refusal of a promotion would be inadmissible because the LPA would be inapplicable in that context.
A/36/2000 · ge (art. 44 al. premier et 2 LPA)
Attorney Malpractice and Professional Misconduct Suspension
Cited in relation to the appellant having access to the case file, as part of the preliminary admissibility findings.
A/284/2025 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Refusal to Approve Municipal Police Nomination Not Subject to Full Judicial Review
The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedure falls under the exclusion from the application of the LPA rules regarding the initial creation of service relationships.
VB.2023.00580 · zh (Art. 2 TSchG)
Pony Owner Compliance Conditions Upheld
This provision was cited among others in the list of legal norms applicable to the case being decided.
A/1729/2024 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Employee Appeal Against Non-Confirmation of Promotion Denied Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning regarding the inapplicability of LPA procedural rules to promotions.
A/2257/2021 · ge (art. 1 et 2 LPA)
Brazilian National's Residency Appeal Rejected on Hardship Grounds
Cited alongside Art. 60 and 62 to 65 LPA to declare the appeal admissible.
A/3666/2020 · ge (art. 2 let. a LPA)
Official Appeals Suspension of Departmental Duties
Cited in the reasoning concerning the admissibility of the appeal, specifically whether the contested act is a decision or an internal organizational act.
A/2252/2008 · ge (Art. 2 al. 3 LPA)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Force Majeure
This provision (although not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1 or 2, but rather used implicitly or as background context to support the finding of inadmissibility based on the opposition being invalid, which is a mandatory review by the court) does not appear explicitly in the dispositive orders.
UK080085 · zh (Art. 2 TSchG)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Animal Cruelty Investigation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the definition of animal mistreatment under the Animal Protection Act, which forms the basis of the underlying case.
VWBES.2006.319 · so (Art. 2 Tierschutzgesetz, TSchG, SR 455)
Dog Attack Measures Proportionality Review
General provision requiring that animals are kept and treated in a way that best meets their needs, forming the basis for the required measures.
A/2273/2005 · ge (Art. 2 let. e LPA)
Litigant v. Examination Board on Certification Exam Registration and Procedural Costs
Although cited in the reasoning to justify the applicability of the LPA, this provision was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
A/2273/2005 · ge (Art. 2 let. e LPA)
Litigant v. Examination Board on Certification Exam Registration and Procedural Costs
This provision was cited in the reasoning regarding the applicability of the LPA, but not in the operative part.
A/2118/2005 · ge (Art. 2 lettre e LPA)
Student Suspends Fraud Finding Over Dictionary Use in Exam
Cited in the reasoning regarding procedural applicability, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.