Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
455 TSCHGLPALPAN CH

Art. 17 Legge federale del 16 dicembre 2005 sulla protezione degli animali (LPAn) - Limitazione al minimo indispensabile

LPAn; Capitolo 2: Trattamento degli animali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (56 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 17 LPAn · Limitazione al minimo indispensabile

Gli esperimenti che provocano all’animale dolori, sofferenze o lesioni, lo pongono in stato d’ansietà oppure che possono compromettere in misura notevole il suo stato generale o ledere in altro modo la sua dignità devono essere limitati al minimo indispensabile.

← Art. 16 LPAn Legge federale del 16 dicembre 2005 sulla protezione degli animali (LPAn) - Scopo Art. 18 LPAn →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (302)

A/2149/2023 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Employee Dismissal Upheld Due to Irreparable Breach of Trust and Chronic Misconduct
Cited in the reasoning establishing the admissibility of the appeal before the competent jurisdiction.
A/3061/2019 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Prison Guard's Appeal Inadmissible Due to Untimely Cost Payment
Cited in the reasoning as one of the elements supporting the general admissibility of the appeal before the substantive issue was examined, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
A/2440/2015 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Association v. State Council (Denial of Justice Regarding Teacher Re-evaluation)
Cited as a basis for the admissibility of the appeal concerning the competent jurisdiction.
A/899/2015 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Probationary Employee Termination for Persistent Performance Deficiencies Upheld
Cited as a procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal.
A/3010/2013 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 et 62 al. 1 let. a LPA)
Public Employee Termination Upheld Despite Post-Surgical Protection Claim
Cited in the initial finding that the appeal was admissible.
A/3942/2011 · ge (art. 17A LPA)
Disciplinary Revocation Upheld Despite Procedural Flaws Due to Egregious Misconduct
Cited as the procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal against the revocation.
A/3749/2024 · ge (art. 17 al. 1 LPA)
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Untimely Filing
Cited in the reasoning regarding when procedural deadlines begin to run.
A/1748/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
French National Entry Ban Upheld for Drug Offenses
Cited as part of the provisions establishing the admissibility of the appeal.
A/738/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 5 LPA)
Municipality Fines Annulled Due to Procedural Violation of Right to Be Heard
Mentioned in the context of how the Commune should have treated the appellant's communication as an appeal, thus affecting the receivability finding.
A/2924/2024 · ge (Art. 17 al. 5 LPA)
Unemployment Insurance Funding Denial for Vocational Training
Applied to consider the appeal filed within the deadline despite being sent to the wrong authority (order 1).
A/4219/2024 · ge (art. 17 LPA)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
The deadline for appeal was calculated based on this article, which establishes when appeal periods start to run.
A/3088/2024 · ge (Art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Claimant v. Insurer: Scooter Accident Disability Pension and Scarring Compensation Appeal
Cited regarding the postponement of the deadline falling on a Saturday to the following Monday.
A/3966/2023 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Office-to-Hotel Conversion Permit Denial Upheld on Window Egress Requirements
Cited as a procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal.
A/3774/2024 · ge (art. 17 al. 3 LPA)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing After Health College Decision
Cited as the rule governing the extension of the deadline when it falls on a Sunday, establishing the final due date.
A/943/2024 · ge (Art. 17 al. 5 LPA)
Former Managing Partner's Appeal on Liability for Unpaid Social Security Contributions
Applied to consider the appeal filed within the time limit, despite being initially addressed to an incompetent authority.