455.1
TSCHVOPAN
CH
CH
Art. 77 Ordinanza del 23 aprile 2008 sulla protezione degli animali (OPAn) - ...
OPAn; Capitolo 3: Animali domestici
Art. 77 OPAn · ...
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (21)
SB240035 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. a TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 26 Abs. 2 TSchG, Art. 4 Abs. 2 TSchG und Art. 77 TSchV)
Animal Cruelty Conviction Upheld Despite Sentence Modification on Appeal
The accused was convicted of negligent animal cruelty under these provisions in the final orders.
SB230251 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. a TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 4 Abs. 2 TSchG und Art. 77 TSchV)
State v. Smith (Dog Attack and Hunting Violations)
Basis for conviction for intentional animal cruelty (Dossier 1).
BK 2022 241 · be (Art. 77 TSchV)
Appellate Review of Negligent Bodily Harm Investigation Non-Commencement Due to Insufficient Fact-Finding
Cited as part of the relevant legal standard for the required duty of care for a dog owner.
SST.2022.67 · ag (Art. 77 TSchV)
Owner Acquitted of Animal Welfare Charges, Upheld for Dog Control Violations
Cited in the dispositive for the acquittal of the defendant regarding the charge of negligent violation of the Animal Protection Act due to insufficient legal basis.
BEK 2020 91 · sz (Art. 28 Abs. 1 lit. a und Abs. 2 TSchG i.V.m. Art. 77 TSchV)
State v. Appellant (Animal Protection and Leash Law Violations)
This provision was the basis for the acquittal concerning the repeated negligent violation of animal protection law.
BK 2019 318 · be (Art. 77 TSchV)
Veterinary Service v. Prosecutor (Animal Cruelty and Dog Bite Incident)
Cited in E. 6.6 as the provision imposing obligations on dog keepers to take precautions against endangerment of people and animals.
VB.2018.00391 · zh (Art. 77 TSchV)
Administrative Court Upholds Seizure and Euthanasia of Unsecured Dog
This provision is cited in the context of the grounds justifying the definitive seizure and euthanasia of the dog, implicitly forming the basis of the final decision.
B.2015.153 · sg (Art. 77 TSchV)
Owner Fails to Regain Custody of Aggressive Dog After Public Attack and Non-Compliance with Housing Restrictions
Cited to establish the duty of the dog keeper to prevent the dog from endangering people or animals.
SK1 2015 17 · gr (Art. 77 TSchV)
State v. Dog Owner: Negligent Animal Violation Appeal
This provision defines the offense (negligent violation of animal protection legislation) for which the appellant was convicted in the final order.
V 12 188 · lu (Art. 77 TSchV)
Livestock Guardian Dog Owner Appeals Disproportionate Control Measures After Companion Dog Bite
Cited in the context of the duty of the dog owner to take precautions so the dog does not endanger people or animals, requiring consideration of the dog's purpose.
SK1 2013 4 · gr (Art. 77 TSchV in Verbindung mit Art. 28 Abs. 3 TSchG)
Negligent Violation of Animal Welfare Legislation by Livestock Guardian Dog Owner
This provision is the substantive ground for finding the respondent guilty of negligent violation of animal welfare legislation.
VB.2012.00520 · zh (Art. 77 TSchV)
Dog owner's appeal against muzzle and leash requirement dismissed
This provision governs the imposition of precautionary measures to prevent harm from animals.
VB.2010.00310 · zh (Art. 77 TSchV)
**Dog Owner Fails to Overturn Aggression-Based Restrictions**
Cited as a legal basis for imposing measures related to dog handling.
U 2009 90 · gr (Art. 77 der eidgenössischen Tierschutzverordnung (TSchV; SR 455.1))
Owner v. Administrative Measures Regarding Aggressive Sled Dog Pack
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the general duty of dog keepers to prevent danger.
VB.2009.00284 · zh (Art. 77 TSchV)
Owner Challenging Third-Party Leash Requirement After Dog Bite Incident
This article was cited in relation to the legal framework governing the measures imposed on the dog owner.