351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP

CH

Art. 89 Legge federale del 20 marzo 1981 sull'assistenza internazionale in materia penale (AIMP) - Effetti

AIMP; Parte quarta: Perseguimento penale in via sostitutiva; Capitolo 1: Condizioni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (157 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 89 AIMP · Effetti

Se uno Stato estero assume il perseguimento penale, le autorità svizzere non possono prendere altri provvedimenti per lo stesso reato contro la persona perseguita: a. fintanto che lo Stato richiesto non abbia comunicato di non essere in grado di portare a termine il procedimento, o b. se, in base a una decisione presa in questo Stato, sono adempiute le condizioni di cui all’articolo 5 lettera a o b.

La prescrizione secondo il diritto svizzero è sospesa per tutta la durata del procedimento nello Stato richiesto, inclusa l’esecuzione penale.

Se la persona perseguita gli è stata estradata per altri fatti, lo Stato richiesto, nella misura in cui dà seguito alla domanda di perseguimento penale, non è tenuto ad osservare le condizioni d’estradizione giusta l’articolo 38.

← Art. 88 AIMP Legge federale del 20 marzo 1981 sull'assistenza internazionale in materia penale (AIMP) - Oggetto Art. 90 AIMP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

BB.2023.68 (Art. 89 IRSG)

Federal Criminal Court Orders Resumption of Investigation, Citing Violation of Plaintiffs' Right to Be Heard

Cited in relation to the transfer of criminal proceedings to another state.

RR.2013.22 (Art. 89 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)

Appeal Against Evidence Handover to Germany for Fraud Investigation Dismissed

Cited to clarify that this provision is not applicable to coercive measures taken in favor of the state conducting the criminal proceedings, as it pertains to preventing double prosecution by Swiss authorities after a transfer.

D.cision.2011.476 · vd (Art. 89 EIMP)

Federal Office of Justice Delegation Standing and Delay in Criminal Proceedings

This provision, cited in the preamble, outlines the effects of delegating criminal proceedings, relevant to the second part of the appeal which was declared inadmissible.

BK.2009.10 (art. 89 EIMP)

Swiss Prosecutor's Order for Costs Annulled After Foreign Proceedings Terminated

Used to determine that the Swiss authorities were no longer competent to resume proceedings after the French authorities had closed their investigation.

RR.2007.5 (art. 89 al. 1 let. a EIMP)

Release of Seized Assets in Delegated Criminal Proceedings

Cited to explain the conditions under which Swiss authorities are no longer competent after delegation of criminal proceedings.

RR.2007.5 (art. 89 al. 1 let. b EIMP)

Release of Seized Assets in Delegated Criminal Proceedings

Cited to explain the conditions under which Swiss authorities are no longer competent after delegation of criminal proceedings.

RR.2008.26 (Art. 89 EIMP)

Swiss Court Rules on Delegation of Prosecution and Seizure Order

Cited in the context of when a delegation decision takes effect, specifically that it requires the requested state to declare acceptance of the prosecution.

INC.2002.59402 · ti (art. 89 AIMP)

Appeal Regarding Refusal to Unseize Company Share Capital in Ongoing Fraud Investigation

Cited as a basis for the decision regarding the cessation of Swiss jurisdiction following the foreign authority taking over the proceedings.

TPF 2010 79 (Art. 89 al. 1 lit. b EIMP)

Swiss Criminal Jurisdiction Lost Upon Foreign Delegation: Costs Voided

Applied to determine that Swiss authorities should refrain from taking further measures because the foreign state had issued a decision of dismissal or non-suit.

INC.2002.59402 · ti (Art. 89 AIMP)

Company and Individuals v. Public Prosecutor (Seizure of Share Capital)

The provision dictates that Swiss authorities cannot take further action once the foreign State has assumed jurisdiction, which forms the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible.