Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP CH

Art. 80e Legge federale del 20 marzo 1981 sull'assistenza internazionale in materia penale (AIMP) - Ricorso contro le decisioni dell’autorità d’esecuzione

AIMP; Parte terza: Altra assistenza; Capitolo 2: Procedura
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (157 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 80e AIMP · Ricorso contro le decisioni dell’autorità d’esecuzione

La decisione dell’autorità cantonale o federale d’esecuzione relativa alla chiusura della procedura d’assistenza giudiziaria può essere impugnata, congiuntamente alle decisioni incidentali anteriori, con ricorso alla Corte dei reclami penali del Tribunale penale federale.

Le decisioni incidentali anteriori alla decisione di chiusura possono essere impugnate separatamente se causano un pregiudizio immediato e irreparabile mediante: a. il sequestro di beni e valori; o b. la presenza di persone che partecipano al processo all’estero.

Si applica per analogia l’articolo 80 l capoversi 2 e 3.

← Art. 80dundecies AIMP Legge federale del 20 marzo 1981 sull'assistenza internazionale in materia penale (AIMP) - Oggetto Art. 80f e 80g AIMP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (643)

BGE 123 II 161 (Art. 80e let. a EIMP)
Mutual Legal Assistance to Russia: Standing limited to own bank accounts, refusal unjustified by general human rights record, assistance conditioned on fair-trial guarantees, seals lifted.
Allows the decision on compliance with conditions to be challenged jointly with the closure decision if rendered beforehand.
RR.2026.39 (art. 80e cpv. 1 AIMP)
Federal Criminal Court Upholds Vatican's Mutual Legal Assistance Request in Embezzlement Investigation
This provision governs the possibility of appealing decisions closing the judicial assistance procedure, which was the nature of the decision under review.
RR.2026.21 (art. 80e al. 1 EIMP)
International Judicial Assistance for Spain Upheld
Cited in relation to the motivation of the appealed decision.
RR.2026.25 (art. 80e al. 1 EIMP)
Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation v. Montenegro (Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Power of Attorney)
Cited in conjunction with other provisions to establish the court's jurisdiction.
RR.2025.211 (art. 80e cpv. 2 lett. a AIMP)
International Judicial Assistance for Asset Seizure Dismissed Due to Lack of Demonstrated Harm
The appeal is declared inadmissible due to the lack of proven immediate and irreparable prejudice.
RR.2026.3 (Art. 80e Abs. 1 IRSG)
Disclosure of Bank Records to Germany Upheld in Fraud Investigation
This provision establishes that the appeal against the final decision of the executing cantonal authority is admissible to the Federal Criminal Court's Chamber of Appeals.
RR.2026.7 (art. 80e cpv. 2 lett. a AIMP)
Switzerland Dismisses Appeal Against Seizure of Painting in Italian Probe
Used to establish the conditions under which an interim decision, such as a seizure, can be appealed separately.
RR.2025.181 (Art. 80e cpv. 1 AIMP)
Switzerland: Mutual Legal Assistance for Italian Tax Fraud Investigation Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for appealing against closure decisions in mutual assistance proceedings.
RR.2025.193 (Art. 80e Abs. 1 IRSG)
Ukraine Mutual Legal Assistance and Witness Transcript Transmission
The court based its admissibility decision on the fact that the final decision of the prosecuting authority is subject to appeal to the Federal Criminal Court.
RR.2025.170 (Art. 80e cpv. 2 AIMP)
Swiss Debt Seizure Void Due to Lack of Jurisdiction
Cited as the legal basis for the admissibility of an appeal against an interim decision involving the seizure of assets.
RR.2025.89 (art. 80e al. 1 EIMP)
Swiss Bank Records Disclosure for French Money Laundering Investigation Upheld
This provision established the court's jurisdiction to hear appeals against decisions closing the mutual assistance procedure.
RR.2025.130 (Art. 80e Abs. 1 IRSG)
Latvia v. [Bank Name/Holder of Records] - International Legal Assistance for Money Laundering Investigation
Cited as the basis for the appeal against the partial final decisions and intermediate orders.
RR.2025.141 (art. 80e cpv. 1 AIMP)
*Compagnie Financière et Foncière v. French Republic*
Defines which decisions are subject to appeal in international mutual legal assistance, specifically closure decisions.
RR.2025.154 (art. 80e al. 2 EIMP)
Appeal against summons for mutual legal assistance inadmissible
This provision dictates the conditions under which an incidental decision can be appealed separately, which was the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible.
RR.2025.129 (art. 80e cpv. 2 AIMP)
Vatican v. Swiss Bank Account Seizure Appeal
Used to determine the admissibility of the appeal against an interim decision involving the seizure of assets.