Art. 39 Legge federale del 20 marzo 1981 sull'assistenza internazionale in materia penale (AIMP) - Estensione

A1 24 172 · vs (art. 39 al. 4 AIMP)

Appeal Against Public Procurement Award Due to Procedural Irregularities and Unequal Treatment

Cited in the reasoning section, but not explicitly in the dispositive, concerning the minutes of rectification.

RR.2024.55 (Art. 39 IRSG)

Extradition to Austria for Drug Trafficking Upheld

Cited to explain the procedure for requesting extradition for additional offenses.

RR.2023.41 (Art. 39 EIMP)

Extradition for Drug Offenses Upheld Due to Sufficient Detail

Cited in the dispositive to deny the request for legal aid.

RR.2020.183 (art. 39 et 55 EIMP)

Extradition Extension Upheld Despite Specialty Principle Concerns

These articles concern the extension of extradition and are cited as the legal basis for the decision of the Federal Office of Justice to grant the extension.

RR.2019.352 (Art. 39 EIMP)

Appeal Against Extension of Extradition Dismissed for Lack of Motivation

The provision allows for an appeal against the OFJ's decision to grant an extradition extension.

RR.2018.73 (art. 39 EIMP)

Extradition Extension for VAT Fraud Upheld

Used to address the claim of violation of the principle of specialty in the context of extradition extension.

RR.2018.73 (art. 39 EIMP)

Extradition Extension for VAT Fraud Upheld

Used to rule on the admissibility of the appeal against the decision to extend extradition.

RR.2018.27 (art. 39 al. 2 let. b en lien avec l’art. 37 al. 2 let. a LAOP et de l’art. 12 EIMP)

Malaysia v. Swiss Bank Secrecy: Bribery Investigation and International Legal Assistance

Cited as the basis for applying the procedural rules on costs and legal aid from the PA.

RR.2013.34 (Art. 39 IRSG)

Germany v. [Defendant Name]: Extradition for Embezzlement Upheld

This provision implies that if the requesting state wishes to prosecute for other offenses, a new extradition request must be submitted.

RR.2012.213 (art. 39, 55 al. 3 et 25 al. 1 EIMP)

Untimely Appeal of Extended Extradition Dismissed

Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals to rule on the extension of extradition.

RR.2012.48 (Art. 39 IRSG)

Extradition to Germany for Assault Upheld

Cited to explain that a new request for extradition would be necessary if Germany wanted to prosecute for other offenses.

60.2007.148 · ti (art. 39 AIMP)

Prosecutor's Decision to Charge Defendant with Non-Extradited Offenses Upheld Pending Extension Request

Cited in the reasoning as the equivalent of Art. 14 CEEstr regarding the speciality principle, and referenced in the general citation of applicable norms in the pronouncement preamble.