314.1 OBGLAOLMD

CH

Art. 7 Legge del 18 marzo 2016 sulle multe disciplinari (LMD) - Responsabilità del detentore del veicolo

LMD

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (18 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 7 LMD · Responsabilità del detentore del veicolo

Se il conducente di un veicolo non viene sorpreso o fermato al momento dell’in-frazione alla LCStr , alle ordinanze emanate in virtù della stessa oppure alla LUSN , la multa è inflitta alla persona fisica o giuridica indicata nella licenza di circolazione come detentore del veicolo.

La multa è comunicata per scritto al detentore indicato nella licenza di circolazione. Questi può pagarla entro 30 giorni.

Se il detentore non paga la multa entro il termine prescritto, è avviato un procedimento penale ordinario.

Se il detentore fornisce nome e indirizzo dell’autore dell’infrazione, nei confronti dello stesso è avviato il procedimento di cui ai capoversi 2 e 3.

Se l’autore dell’infrazione non può essere identificato senza sforzi sproporzionati, il detentore deve pagare la multa entro un termine di 30 giorni, salvo se nell’ambito del procedimento penale ordinario rende verosimile che il suo veicolo è stato utilizzato contro la sua volontà e senza che egli potesse impedirlo, nonostante abbia usato la dovuta diligenza.

← Art. 6 LMD Legge del 18 marzo 2016 sulle multe disciplinari (LMD) - Principi Art. 8 LMD →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (16)

BGE 151 IV 237 (Art. 7 al. 5 LAO)

Vehicle Owner’s Conviction for Speeding Committed by Unknown Driver Under Holder Liability Violates Principle of Culpability; Art. 7(5) LAO Is Subsidiary Administrative Liability, Not Penal Basis

Main legal basis for the decision, defining the subsidiary administrative liability allowing only payment of the fine, not a criminal conviction.

VPB 93-073 (Art. 7 LAO)

Federal Act on Traffic Order Fines Amendment

Establishes that no costs are incurred in the simplified procedure for fines.

P/23645/2021 · ge (art. 7 al. 5 LAO)

Owner Fails to Identify Driver, Subjected to Administrative Fine for Speeding

The court condemned the appellant to an administrative fine based on this provision as the responsible party for failing to identify the driver, despite acquittal on the substantive charge.

CP 2024 14 · ju (Art. 7 al. 5 LAO)

_X_ v. _Y_ (Vehicle Owner Liability for Traffic Offense)

Cited in the final order to condemn the owner of the vehicle to pay the fine for speeding.

SK2 2024 55 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 4 OBG)

Vehicle Owner Cost Reimbursement in Traffic Violation Proceedings

The appeal was granted because the information provided by the appellant met the requirements of this article, meaning the cost imposition in the original decision was unfounded.

P/23645/2021 · ge (art. 7 al. 5 et 14 LAO)

Vehicle Owner Liability for Unidentified Driver in Traffic Violation

Cited in the confirmed dispositive of the first instance judgment for the imposition of the fine as an order penalty against the vehicle owner.

SST.2022.16 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 1 OBG)

Unlawful Surveillance Leads to Acquittal on Most Charges, but DUI and Seatbelt Convictions Upheld

Used in conjunction with other provisions for sentencing with a fine.

SU180046 · zh (Art. 7 OBG)

Owner Liability for Traffic Violation Upheld on Radar Evidence

Cited in section V.1 to discuss the principle of cost exemption in the fine procedure, ultimately justifying the confirmation of the first instance's costs in order 3.

SU160069 · zh (Art. 7 OBG)

Owner Responsibility for Red Light Violation

States that no costs are incurred in the summary offense procedure (Ordnungsbussenverfahren).

30.2005.69 · ti (art. 7 LMD)

Traffic Authority Fine Appeal Over Blue Zone Parking Duration

Cited in the reasoning to justify exempting the appellant from paying first-instance costs (though not explicitly listed in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3, it relates to the costs aspect mentioned in the reasoning before the final pronouncement).

30.2004.350 · ti (art. 7 LMD)

Appeal Regarding Driving Prohibition and Vision Correction Violation

This provision was cited to justify exempting the appellant from paying the costs of the first instance proceedings.

VPB No-13-2-avril-1996 (Art. 7 LAO)

Federal Police Authority to Prosecute Powder Monopoly Offenses and Traffic Offense Ordinance

This article states that no costs are incurred when the order fine procedure is applied.

VPB 93-073 (Art. 7 OBG)

Adjustment of Administrative Fines for Traffic Offenses

Used to repeal the provision on the imposition of costs for fines.

30.2004.350 · ti (art. 7 LMD)

Traffic Fine Reduction for Unreported Vision Correction Change

Cited as the basis for exempting the appellant from the costs of the first instance proceeding.

SU180046 · zh (Art. 7 OBG)

Registered Keeper Liability for Traffic Violation Despite Challenging Radar Evidence

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the principle of cost exemption in the 'Ordnungsbussenverfahren', justifying why costs are imposed in this specific case where the ordinary procedure was correctly initiated.