313.0
VSTRRDPA
CH
CH
Art. 98 Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA)
DPA; Titolo terzo: Procedura penale amministrativa; Capo sesto: Spese, indennità e regresso; A. Spese; III. Rimborso delle spese al Cantone
Art. 98 DPA
Il Cantone può chiedere alla Confederazione il rimborso delle spese processuali e d’esecuzione alle quali l’imputato non è stato condannato o che l’imputato non è in grado di pagare. Sono eccettuati gli onorari e le diarie dei funzionari, come anche gli emolumenti e le tasse di bollo.
A richiesta, la Confederazione può rimborsare ai Cantoni interamente o in parte le spese straordinarie causate dalla rimessione dei procedimenti giusta l’articolo 20 capoverso 3.
Le contestazioni fra Confederazione e Cantone quanto al rimborso delle spese sono decise dalla Corte dei reclami penali del Tribunale penale federale (art. 25 cpv. 1).
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (21)
BV.2024.18 (Art. 98 Abs. 2 VStrR)
City Cost Invoice Dispute Not Within Federal Criminal Court Jurisdiction
This provision governs disputes between the Confederation and a canton regarding cost reimbursement, and the court determined it did not grant it jurisdiction for the present matter.
BKBES.2024.92 · so (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Federal Tax Administration v. Compensation for Discontinued Tax Evasion Proceedings
Governs reimbursement between Cantons and the Confederation for costs not borne by the defendant, relevant to order no. 2.
UH240103 · zh (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Regulatory Commission Appeal Dismissed Due to Defective Indictment Form
Cited implicitly as part of the cost attribution rules, though the cost recovery aspect concerning the Confederation was ultimately not applied to court fees.
S2 2023 33 · zg (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Tax Administration v. Acquittal on Withholding Tax Evasion
This provision was used to instruct the cantonal court treasury to claim reimbursement for costs and expenses from the federal treasury.
S 2023 19 · zg (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Administrative Authority v. Individual (Gaming Act Intent)
Cited for ordering the Cantonal Court Cashier to claim reimbursement of costs from the Federal Public Treasury.
STBER.2021.42 · so (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Appeal Regarding Conviction for Repeated Unauthorized Gambling Operations
This provision mandates the recovery of state-paid defense counsel compensation from the federal treasury, mentioned in the reasoning section regarding the first instance costs, which the appeal decision confirms.
SK 2020 423 · be (Art. 98 VStrR)
Swiss Cantonal High Court Acquits on Gaming Machine Violations Applying Milder Post-2019 Law
Cited indirectly to state that the cost burden for a public acquittal (Bund) is handled administratively, not via a judicial order against the Bund.
STBER.2021.12 · so (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Money Games Act Violation Conviction Overturned Due to Unwarranted Search of Public Premises
Applied to allow the Canton of Solothurn to claim reimbursement from the Confederation for costs incurred in the first instance and appeal proceedings.
STBER.2020.67 · so (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Acquittal for Casino Act Violations Due to Inadmissible Search Evidence; *Ne Bis In Idem* Defense Rejected on Jurisdictional Grounds
Cited in relation to the Canton's right to seek reimbursement from the Confederation for process costs the accused was not ordered to pay.
SU190041 · zh (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Defendants v. State: Gaming Act Violations and Unlicensed Machine Operation
Cited regarding the procedure for reclaiming investigation costs from the Confederation.
SU190002 · zh (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Gambling Asset Confiscation and Substitute Claim Calculation
Governs the administrative recovery of costs from the Confederation by the canton, excluding fees and court costs.
BK 2018 92 · be (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Federal Gaming Board v. Cantonal High Court (Casino Act Statute of Limitations)
Cited in the dispositive for ordering the Canton of Bern to be reimbursed by the Confederation for the costs of the appeal proceedings.
SU140044 · zh (Art. 98 VStrR)
Bar Operator Acquitted of Alcohol Act Violation Due to Excusable Factual Error on Spirit Classification
This article was cited as the source implying that costs following an acquittal in the judicial proceedings are borne by the Confederation, addressed in order 4 and implicitly in order 6.
UK070155 · zh (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Customs Fine Conversion to Substitute Custody: Penal Code vs. Administrative Penal Law
This provision was cited to order that no court fees shall be collected.
VBE 2005 3 · gr (Art. 98 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Conversion of Unpaid Tax Fine into Custody
Cited in the reasoning regarding the reimbursement of execution costs by the Confederation, relevant to the cost allocation in order 3.