313.0
VSTRRDPA
CH
CH
Art. 75 Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA)
DPA; Titolo terzo: Procedura penale amministrativa; Capo terzo: Procedura giudiziaria; A. Procedura davanti ai tribunali cantonali; III. Preparazione del dibattimento
Art. 75 DPA
Il tribunale informa le parti del ricevimento degli atti. Esamina se il giudizio del tribunale è stato chiesto in tempo utile.
Il tribunale può, d’ufficio o a richiesta di una parte, completare o far completare gli atti prima del dibattimento.
La data del dibattimento è notificata in tempo utile alle parti.
Il rappresentante del pubblico ministero della Confederazione e quello dell’amministrazione non sono tenuti a presentarsi personalmente.
L’imputato può, a richiesta, essere dispensato dal comparire.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (6)
WSG 2024 14 · be (Art. 75 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Cantonal Court Voids Fraud Investigation Due to Improper Delegation of Fedpol Agents
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the accused had timely requested judicial review, which is a prerequisite for the court to proceed with the accusation review.
SK.2010.4 (Art. 75 Abs. 4 i.V.m. Art. 81 VStrR)
Acquittal in Stock Disclosure Case Due to Lack of Proof of Group Formation
Cited to explain why the representatives of the EFD and the Public Prosecutor's Office were not obliged to attend the main hearing.
VBE 2006 1 · gr (Art. 75 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Antelope Hair Scarf Case: Timeliness of Judicial Review of Administrative Penalty
Cited as the legal basis for the court to examine whether a timely request for judicial review was submitted, leading to the non-admission of the request.
VBE 2006 1 · gr (Art. 75 Abs. 5 VStrR)
Antelope Hair Scarf Case: Timeliness of Judicial Review of Administrative Penalty
Cited in the considerations (Erwägungen) regarding the waiver of an oral hearing, but not in the final orders.
VBE 2006 4 · gr (Art. 75 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Shahtoosh Import Violation Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Judicial Review Request
This provision, concerning the court's review of whether a timely request for judicial review has been submitted, was cited in the reasoning leading up to the non-admission.
UK050187 · zh (Art. 75 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Medicinal Institute v. Unknown Person: Non-Admission of Indictment for Alleged Unauthorized Drug Advertising
Cited in the reasoning regarding the limited scope of evidence supplementation by the court.