313.0 VSTRRDPA

CH

Art. 52 Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA)

DPA; Titolo terzo: Procedura penale amministrativa; Capo secondo: Inchiesta e decisione penale dell’amministrazione; F. Provvedimenti coattivi; VI. Arresto; 1. Ammissibilità

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (114 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 52 DPA

Contro l’imputato gravemente indiziato di un’infrazione si può emettere un ordine d’arresto, se determinate circostanze fanno presumere che intenda: a. sottrarsi al procedimento penale o all’esecuzione della pena o b. cancellare tracce dell’infrazione, distruggere elementi probatori, indurre testimoni o coimputati a fare false dichiarazioni o compromettere in analogo modo il risultato dell’inchiesta.

L’ordine d’arresto non può essere emesso se sproporzionato all’importanza della causa.

← Art. 51 DPA Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA) Art. 53 DPA →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (9)

BH.2021.4 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VStrR)

Gambling Operation Arrestee's Release Overturned Due to Flight Risk

Defines the conditions under which a warrant of arrest may be issued.

BH.2019.5 (Art. 52 DPA)

Pre-trial Detention for Undeclared Imports Upheld, Legal Aid Granted

Used to justify the deprivation of liberty order because the accused is suspected of having committed serious offenses.

BH.2017.12 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 lit. b VStrR)

Appeal Dismissed: Probable Cause for Customs Violations and Risk of Collusion Found

The provision was considered in determining the risk of collusion, which was a factor in the original arrest order.

BH.2017.12 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VStrR)

Appeal Dismissed: Probable Cause for Customs Violations and Risk of Collusion Found

Mentioned as a legal basis for detention, but not directly used in the final orders.

BH.2017.12 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 lit. b VStrR)

Appeal Dismissed: Probable Cause for Customs Violations and Risk of Collusion Found

Mentioned in the context of the grounds for detention, specifically collusion risk, but not directly used in the final orders.

BH.2017.9 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VStrR)

Upholding Pre-Trial Detention Extension for Suspected Tax Violator

Cited as the legal basis for ordering pre-trial detention, requiring urgent suspicion of an offense and risk of flight or collusion.

BH.2017.9 (Art. 52 Abs. 2 VStrR)

Upholding Pre-Trial Detention Extension for Suspected Tax Violator

Cited as the legal basis for ensuring pre-trial detention is proportionate.

BH.2014.6 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 lit. b VStrR)

Applicant's pretrial detention challenged for insufficient grounds, later rendered moot.

This provision was cited as the ground for the initial detention order, which the court found to be unjustified upon review.

BH.2014.5 (Art. 52 Abs. 1 lit. b VStrR)

Appellant's Release from Pre-trial Detention Overturned Due to Lack of Collusion Risk

The appeal was upheld because the specific grounds for detention, namely the risk of collusion, were not met.