Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
313.0 VSTRRDPA CH

Art. 26 Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA)

DPA; Titolo terzo: Procedura penale amministrativa; Capo primo: Autorità; disposizioni generali di procedura; B. Reclamo contro operazioni d’inchiesta; I. In materia di provvedimenti coattivi
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (114 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 26 DPA

Contro i provvedimenti coattivi (art. 45 e segg.) e le operazioni e omissioni connesse può essere proposto reclamo alla Corte dei reclami penali del Tribunale penale federale.

Il reclamo deve essere presentato: a. alla Corte dei reclami penali, se è diretto contro un’autorità giudiziaria cantonale o contro il direttore o capo dell’amministrazione in causa; b. al direttore o capo dell’amministrazione in causa, negli altri casi.

Se, nei casi del capoverso 2 lettera b, il direttore o capo dell’amministrazione in causa rettifica l’operazione o rimedia all’omissione in conformità delle conclusioni proposte, il reclamo diventa senza oggetto; in caso contrario, questi deve trasmetterlo alla Corte dei reclami penali, con le sue osservazioni, al più tardi il terzo giorno feriale dopo il suo ricevimento.

← Art. 25 DPA Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA) Art. 27 DPA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (174)

BV.2026.5 (art. 26 DPA)
Bid-rigging Investigation: Data Seizure Challenge Dismissed
Cited as the provision under which the complaint was filed, but ultimately declared inadmissible.
BV.2025.43 (art. 26 cpv. 1 DPA)
Cash Seizure Upheld Despite Delay in Proceedings
Cited as the basis for the appeal to the Federal Criminal Court.
BV.2025.35 (Art. 26 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Customs Seizure and Document Access Appeal
Allows appeals against coercive measures and related official acts to the Federal Criminal Court's Complaints Chamber.
BV.2025.5 (Art. 26 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Seizure of Non-Compliant Radio Devices Upheld
Cited as the basis for appealing coercive measures to the Federal Criminal Court's Complaints Chamber.
BV.2024.30 (art. 26 al. 1 DPA)
Swissmedic Seizure of Unapproved Medications Upheld
Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Court of Complaints regarding appeals against coercive measures.
BV.2024.30 (art. 26 al. 2 let. a DPA)
Swissmedic Seizure of Unapproved Medications Upheld
Cited to explain the procedure for appeals when the decision emanates from the director of the administration.
BV.2024.30 (art. 26 al. 2 let. b DPA)
Swissmedic Seizure of Unapproved Medications Upheld
Cited to explain the procedure for appeals when the decision emanates from an investigating official.
BV.2024.30 (art. 26 al. 3 DPA)
Swissmedic Seizure of Unapproved Medications Upheld
Cited to explain the timeline for transmitting appeals to the Court of Complaints.
BV.2024.26 (art. 26 DPA)
Tax Evasion: Court Upholds Seizure of Apartments
Cited as the legal basis for the court's review of coercive measures.
BV.2024.26 (art. 26 al. 1 DPA)
Tax Evasion: Court Upholds Seizure of Apartments
Cited as the basis for the competence of the Court of Appeals to review coercive measures.
BV.2024.26 (art. 26 al. 2 let. a DPA)
Tax Evasion: Court Upholds Seizure of Apartments
Cited to determine where a complaint against the director or head of administration should be filed.
BV.2024.14 (Art. 26 al. 1 DPA)
Tax Investigation and Seizure Challenge Dismissed
Basis for the complaint filed against coercive measures.
BV.2024.2 (Art. 26 al. 2 let. b DPA)
Customs Seizure and Search Upheld in Tax Evasion Case
Determined that the complaint regarding the seizure was filed with an incompetent authority.
BV.2023.9 (art. 26 al. 1 DPA)
Federal Court Upholds Tax Investigation Seizures Despite Initial Lack of Notice
Cited as the legal basis for the complaint against the seizure orders.
BV.2023.15 (Art. 26 al. 1 DPA)
Customs Declarations Admissible Despite Self-Incrimination Claim
Cited as the provision allowing complaints against coercive measures to be filed with the Court of Appeals.