Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
313.0 VSTRRDPA CH

Art. 25 Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA)

DPA; Titolo terzo: Procedura penale amministrativa; Capo primo: Autorità; disposizioni generali di procedura; A. Autorità; VI. Corte dei reclami penali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (114 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 25 DPA

La Corte dei reclami penali del Tribunale penale federale decide i reclami e le contestazioni che le sono deferiti in virtù della presente legge.

In quanto sia necessario per la decisione da prendere, la Corte dei reclami penali ordina l’assunzione delle prove; a tal fine essa può ricorrere ai servigi dell’amministrazione in causa come anche a quelli del giudice istruttore federale della regione linguistica corrispondente.

Qualora la tutela d’importanti interessi pubblici o privati lo richieda, la Corte dei reclami penali prende cognizione della prova escludendo il reclamante o il richiedente.

L’onere delle spese per la procedura di reclamo davanti alla Corte dei reclami penali si determina secondo l’articolo 73 della legge del 19 marzo 2010 sull’organizzazione delle autorità penali.

← Art. 24 DPA Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA) Art. 26 DPA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (681)

BV.2025.44 (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VStrR i.V.m. Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG analog)
Administrative Penalty: Right to File Access and New Deadline
Used to determine that costs are generally imposed on the losing party, but can be distributed differently or waived.
BV.2026.3 (art. 25 cpv. 4 DPA)
Claimant Denied Restitution for Missed Deadline, Appeal Inadmissible Due to Unpaid Costs
Cited as the basis for the application of the Federal Criminal Court's Fee and Indemnity Regulation in determining costs.
BV.2026.5 (art. 25 al. 4 DPA)
Bid-rigging Investigation: Data Seizure Challenge Dismissed
Cited as the basis for applying the LTF provisions on costs to the appeal proceedings before the Court of Complaints.
BE.2026.4 (art. 25 al. 4 DPA)
Mobile Phone Seizure and Costs: Moot Request, Owner Liable
Cited in relation to Art. 66 al. 1 LTF for costs, establishing that no procedural costs are charged to lower or federal authorities that are rejected.
BV.2025.50 (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VStrR)
Appeal Dismissed Over Lack of Legal Interest in Suspended Proceedings
Determines that the court costs are to be borne by the unsuccessful appellant.
BV.2025.42 (Art. 25 Abs. 4 VStrR)
Tax Evasion Defendant's Right to Appointed Counsel Affirmed
Cited for the exemption from court fees in this type of proceeding.
BE.2025.18 (Art. 25 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Bank Documents Unsealed in Money Laundering Probe
Cited in conjunction with Art. 50 Abs. 3 VStrR and Art. 37 Abs. 2 lit. b StBOG to determine the chamber's jurisdiction for deciding on the admissibility of the search.
BE.2024.15 (art. 25 al. 1 DPA)
Federal Criminal Court Lifts Seals on Tax Evasion Data
This provision establishes the jurisdiction of the Court of Complaints for decisions on lifting seals.
BE.2024.15 (art. 25 al. 4 DPA)
Federal Criminal Court Lifts Seals on Tax Evasion Data
This provision, applied in conjunction with other articles, is used to calculate court fees.
BE.2025.21 (Art. 25 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Sealed Phone, Unreadable Data, Court Denies Unsealing Request
This provision, in conjunction with Art. 50 Abs. 3 VStrR, designates the Complaints Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court as the authority to decide on the admissibility of the search.
BE.2024.24 (art. 25 al. 4 DPA)
Federal Criminal Court lifts bank secrecy in tax evasion probe.
Applied to determine the costs in conjunction with art. 422 al. 1 CPP.
BE.2024.25 (art. 25 al. 1 DPA)
Federal Criminal Court Lifts Bank Seals in Tax Evasion Case
This provision establishes the competence of the Court of Appeals to rule on requests concerning the lifting of seals.
BE.2025.35 (Art. 25 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Unsealing of Seized Phone Data Denied Due to Insufficient Secrecy Claim
This provision grants the appellate chamber jurisdiction to decide on the admissibility of the search.
BE.2020.11 (Art. 25 al. 4 DPA)
Federal Criminal Court Partially Lifts Seals on Seized Tax Evasion Data, Upholding Privilege Claims
Cited as applicable to the calculation of costs for the procedure.
BE.2021.18A (Art. 25 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Partial Unsealing of Tax Evasion Investigation Documents
Cited in conjunction with Art. 37 Abs. 2 lit. b StBOG for the Federal Criminal Court's jurisdiction.