313.0
VSTRRDPA
CH
CH
Art. 101 Legge federale del 22 marzo 1974 sul diritto penale amministrativo (DPA)
DPA; Titolo terzo: Procedura penale amministrativa; Capo sesto: Spese, indennità e regresso; B. Indennità; II. Nel procedimento giudiziario
Art. 101 DPA
Nel procedimento giudiziario, l’articolo 99 è applicabile per analogia. Il tribunale decide anche circa l’indennità dovuta per pregiudizi sofferti nel procedimento amministrativo.
Prima di stabilire l’indennità, il tribunale deve dare all’amministrazione in causa la possibilità di esprimersi su il diritto all’indennità e l’ammontare della medesima, e di presentare proposte.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (43)
SK.2025.37 (art. 101 cpv. 1 DPA)
Director Fined for Negligent False Reporting to Fiduciary Oversight Body
This provision was applied to grant the defendant an indemnity for damages suffered during the administrative proceedings.
BKBES.2024.92 · so (Art. 101 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Federal Tax Administration v. Compensation for Discontinued Tax Evasion Proceedings
States that the court decides on compensation for disadvantages in the administrative procedure, relevant to the award of compensation in order no. 1, point 3.
SK.2022.33 (art. 101 cpv. 1 DPA)
*Regulator v. Financial Intermediary (False Information & Communication Violations)*
This provision allows the court to decide on compensation for damages suffered during the administrative procedure.
SK.2022.54 (Art. 101 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Statute of Limitations Bars Money Laundering Charges
Cited by the defense and used by the court to grant compensation for defense costs.
S 2023 19 · zg (Art. 101 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 99 Abs. 3 VStrR)
Administrative Authority v. Individual (Gaming Act Intent)
Cited for ordering the Federal Public Treasury to compensate the accused for his requested defense expenses in the administrative procedure.
CA.2022.21 (Art. 101 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Accused's Death Terminates Appeal Proceedings, Declares Judgment Moot
Cited as the basis for the court deciding on compensation for disadvantages suffered during administrative proceedings.
CA.2022.21 (Art. 101 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Accused's Death Terminates Appeal Proceedings, Declares Judgment Moot
Cited as a procedural requirement for the court to grant the administration an opportunity to comment on compensation claims.
SST.2021.210 · ag (Art. 101 VStrR)
Gambling Conviction Reduced by Speedy Trial Violation and Seized Funds Returned
Stated that the costs of the appeal proceedings are borne by the Confederation.
SST.2022.14 · ag (Art. 101 VstrR)
Defendant Convicted for Illegal Gambling Operations Despite Speedy Trial Violation
This provision pertains to the costs borne by the Confederation in legal proceedings.
STBER.2020.14 · so (Art. 101 VStrR)
Appellate Court Upholds Acquittal Based on Milder New Gaming Law
Cited in conjunction with procedural rules (Art. 99 VStrR) regarding the entitlement to compensation for the private defense following acquittal.
SK.2020.16 (art. 101 cpv. 1 DPA)
Securities Dealer Convicted for Unauthorized Trading
This provision of the Administrative Criminal Procedure Act addresses compensation for damages, as referenced in order 4 regarding the rejection of indemnity.
SK 2020 423 · be (Art. 101 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Swiss Cantonal High Court Acquits on Gaming Machine Violations Applying Milder Post-2019 Law
Cited regarding the application of compensation rules (Genugtuung) in the event of acquittal.
STBER.2021.12 · so (Art. 101 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Money Games Act Violation Conviction Overturned Due to Unwarranted Search of Public Premises
Applied to grant the court the authority to rule on compensation for disadvantages from the preceding administrative procedure stage.
CA.2021.6 (Art. 101 Abs. 1 VStrR)
Appeal dismissed as procedural order, case forwarded to complaint chamber.
Used to establish that Article 99 of the VStrR applies mutatis mutandis to compensation for disadvantages suffered in court proceedings.
CA.2021.6 (Art. 101 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Appeal dismissed as procedural order, case forwarded to complaint chamber.
Used to establish that the court must give the administration an opportunity to comment on the claim for compensation and its amount before setting it.