312.1
JSTPOPPMIN
CH
CH
Art. 4 Legge federale del 20 marzo 2009 di diritto processuale penale minorile (PPMin) - Principi
PPMin; Capitolo 1: Oggetto e principi
Art. 4 PPMin · Principi
La presente legge s’impronta alla protezione e all’educazione del minore. L’età e il grado di sviluppo del minore vanno considerati adeguatamente.
In ogni fase del procedimento le autorità penali rispettano i diritti della personalità del minore e gli permettono di partecipare attivamente al procedimento. Fatte salve norme speciali di procedura, il minore è sentito personalmente.
Le autorità penali provvedono affinché il procedimento non interferisca più del necessario nella vita privata del minore e nella sfera d’influenza dei suoi rappresentanti legali.
Qualora appaia opportuno, coinvolgono i rappresentanti legali e l’autorità civile.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (24)
BG.2025.13 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 JStPO)
Zurich Responsible for Prosecuting Crimes of Suspected Adult
This provision emphasizes that the protection and upbringing of young persons are guiding principles in juvenile criminal proceedings, influencing the court's assessment.
BG.2025.13 (Art. 4 Abs. 2 JStPO)
Zurich Responsible for Prosecuting Crimes of Suspected Adult
This provision requires criminal authorities to respect the personal rights of young persons and enable their active participation, which is a general principle considered by the court.
BG.2025.14 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 JStPO)
Jurisdiction based on SEM's corrected age assessment.
This principle guides the application of the JStPO, emphasizing the protection and education of young people and considering their age and developmental stage.
BG.2025.14 (Art. 4 Abs. 2 JStPO)
Jurisdiction based on SEM's corrected age assessment.
This provision mandates that criminal authorities respect the personality rights of young people and enable their active participation in proceedings.
1----------- · vd (art. 4 PPMin)
Juvenile Property Damage and Riot Conviction Upheld; Penalty Partially Suspended
Cited in the final disposition, likely related to the penalty/sentence.
BG.2021.55 (Art. 4 Abs. 2 JStPO)
Jurisdiction over Juvenile Offenses: Canton Dispute Resolution
Cited as a principle that is upheld by having the proceedings conducted in the canton of Obwalden, facilitating the juvenile's active participation.
BG.2021.55 (Art. 4 Abs. 3 JStPO)
Jurisdiction over Juvenile Offenses: Canton Dispute Resolution
Cited as a principle that is upheld by having the proceedings conducted in the canton of Obwalden, minimizing interference with the juvenile's private life and usual environment.
Jug.2021.386 · vd (art. 4 PPMin)
Complicity to Attempted Coercion Upheld in Fatal Drug Deal Shooting Appeal
Cited in the final order section regarding the application of juvenile criminal procedure rules.
P/1341/2021 · ge (art. 4 al. 3 PPMin)
Appeal Against Extended Juvenile Observation for Violent Minor
Cited as the basis for confirming that the principle of proportionality is respected when upholding the challenged order.
Jug.2021.237 · vd (art. 4, 34 ss, 44 PPMin)
Appeal of Acquittal for Sexual Crimes: Insufficient Evidence and Reserved Civil Claims
Cited in the application clause, relating to the application of the Juvenile Penal Procedure rules, relevant to the context of the decision.
SK 2020 292 · be (Art. 1, 3, 4, 34 ff. und 44 JStPO)
Swiss Court Rejects Deportation for Transition Offender Lacking Statutory Basis
Cited in the dispositive section (I.C) as the basis for applying provisions of the Juvenile Criminal Procedure Code (JStPO).
Jug.2020.442 · vd (Art. 3, 4, 40, 44 PPMin)
Juvenile Conviction Upheld for Physical Obstruction During Climate Protest
These procedural articles from the Vaud Penal Procedure Code for Minors were cited in the operative part.
Jug.2020.16 · vd (art. 4 PPMin)
Juvenile Offender Appeals: Property Damage Dismissed, Sexual Coercion Conviction Upheld
Cited in the final operative part, regarding the general procedure.
502 2017 156 · fr (art. 4 PPMin)
Detainee Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Extension for Sexual Coercion and Rape Charges
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the standard of protection and education for the minor, although the main rejection of the appeal was based on the risk of flight.
UH160330 · zh (Art. 4 Abs. 1 JStPO)
Appellant v. State: Admissibility of Interrogation Record Without Existing Defense Counsel
Cited in conjunction with StPO articles for imposing costs on the appellant (also used to set the fee amount).