Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 95 Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Raccolta di dati personali

CPP; Titolo secondo: Autorità penali; Capitolo 8: Norme procedurali generali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (478 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 95 CPP · Raccolta di dati personali

I dati personali sono raccolti presso l’interessato oppure in modo per questi ravvisabile, sempre che il procedimento non ne risulti compromesso o sia reso sproporzionatamente oneroso.

Se non poteva ravvisare di essere oggetto di una raccolta di dati, l’interessato deve esserne immediatamente informato. Si può rinunciare all’informazione o differirla per proteggere interessi pubblici o privati preponderanti.

← Art. 94 CPP Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Campo d’applicazione Art. 95a CPP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (677)

ZZ.1991.30 · so (§ 95 StPO)
Anonymous Witness Testimony and Confrontation Rights in Drug Cases
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rights of the accused and their defense counsel to request and participate in investigative measures during the preliminary investigation.
STBER.2022.43 · so (Art. 95 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
Appeal Against Sentence for Habitual Theft and Fraud
Cited in the operative part of the judgment, likely related to the handling of seized items (Ziffer 10, 11).
CACIV.2022.23 · ne (Art. 106 al. 2 CPC cum art. 95 al. 1 let. b et al. 3 CPP)
Landlord Retaliatory Eviction for Tenant Complaints Upheld
This procedural rule was used to determine the distribution of costs for the appeal proceedings between the parties, following the rejection of both the appeal and the cross-appeal.
Jug.2022.285 · vd (art. 95 al. 1 let. a CPP)
Riot Conviction Upheld Despite Violence Targeting Authorities
Cited in the final orders as a procedural provision applied by the Court.
BK 2019 315 · be (Art. 95 Abs. 1 StPO)
Admissibility of Automatic License Plate Recognition Data in Stolen Goods Prosecution
Cited in the summary as a necessary legal basis for the police to procure data from the Customs Administration.
60.2011.146 · ti (art. 95 cpv. 2 CPP TI)
Bail Release Denial After Conviction and Pending Appeal
Cited in the reasoning, defining the prerequisites for arrest (grave and concrete indications of guilt and public interest motives).
60.2011.146 · ti (art. 95 s. CPP TI)
Bail Release Denial After Conviction and Pending Appeal
Cited in the preamble as applicable law.
60.2010.414 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention in Narcotics and Money Laundering Case
This article concerning serious indications of guilt was cited in the reasoning, although it was not explicitly listed in the final operative orders 1-4, it forms part of the underlying legal justification for the extension examined in the reasoning.
60.2010.411 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention Due to Court Overload
Although cited in the reasoning (point 5) regarding the existence of serious indications of guilt, it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-4, and therefore must be excluded based on the strict rules.
P/18865/2009 · ge (art. 95 al. 4 CPP)
Appellant v. Investigative Judge on Mail and Document Seizure
Cited to establish that the postmark on the appeal envelopes proved the appeal deadline had not expired, rendering the appeals admissible.
60.2010.288 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Narcotics Offenses
This article, regarding serious indications of guilt, was cited by the court when affirming the basis for the detention.
60.2010.267 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pretrial Detention for Charges Including Coercion, Abduction, Threats, and Battery
Cited in the reasoning but not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-4; thus, it is excluded based on the rules.
60.2010.252 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention Due to Trial Postponement
Cited in the reasoning (point 5) to confirm the existence of serious indications of guilt, which is a prerequisite for detention, although not explicitly repeated in the final order, the overall context of the decision relies on the prerequisites established under CPP articles, including Art. 95, which is necessary for the extension granted under Art. 103.
60.2010.261 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Serious Offenses and Flight Risk
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the existence of serious indications of guilt, which is a prerequisite for detention, implicitly supporting the extension.
60.2010.214 · ti (art. 95 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Drug and Money Laundering Defendants
Cited in the reasoning as the standard for serious indications of guilt, which must be present for the detention to be maintained, although not explicitly cited in the final operative order, it sets the prerequisite condition justifying the action.