312.0 STPOCPP

CH

Art. 63 Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Polizia delle udienze

CPP; Titolo secondo: Autorità penali; Capitolo 7: Direzione del procedimento

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (478 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 63 CPP · Polizia delle udienze

Chi dirige il procedimento provvede a far mantenere la sicurezza, la tranquillità e l’ordine durante le udienze.

Chi dirige il procedimento può ammonire le persone che ne turbano l’andamento od offendono le convenienze. In caso di recidiva, può toglier loro la parola, espellerle dalla sala d’udienza e, se necessario, farle custodire dalla polizia sino alla fine dell’udienza. Può altresì far sgomberare la sala d’udienza.

Chi dirige il procedimento può chiedere l’aiuto della polizia competente nel luogo dell’atto procedurale.

Se una parte è allontanata, l’atto procedurale prosegue comunque.

← Art. 62 CPP Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Campo d’applicazione Art. 64 CPP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (32)

STBER.2023.32 · so (Art. 63 StPO)

Appeal of Aggravated Assault Conviction, Sentencing, and Deportation Order

Cited in the preamble of the final orders, relating to the determination of the penalty fine (Order 5.b).

ARMP.2023.130 · ne (Art. 63 al. 2 CPP)

Prosecutor's Denial of Right to Practice Overturned Due to Insufficient Justification of Misconduct

Mentioned in the reasoning section regarding the possibility for the prosecutor to issue warnings, although the final dispositive does not directly apply it to order an action, it is referenced in the context where the court outlines alternative means of redress other than the interdiction to practice.

SBK.2023.260 · ag (Art. 63 StPO)

Judge's Mask Mandate Enforcement Upheld

Cited as a legal basis for the court president's actions to ensure court session order.

CPEN.2022.87 · ne (art. 63 CPP)

Disturbance and Disobedience Conviction Upheld Despite Challenge to Parking Fine Validity

Cited among the considered provisions, relating to the judge's powers to maintain order during the hearing, which justified the appellant's exclusion.

BES.2023.81 · bs (Art. 63 Abs. 1 StPO)

Prosecutor's Exclusion of Defense Counsel from Witness Interrogation Overturned Due to Insufficient Risk of Collusion

Cited as a potential legal basis for restriction based on maintaining order during hearings, although ultimately deemed inapplicable as no disturbance occurred.

ARMP.2022.130 · ne (Art. 63 al. 1 CPP)

Appeal Against Procedural Restriction on Witness Questioning in Fraud Case

Cited as the basis for the Public Prosecutor's obligation to ensure the safety, serenity, and proper order of the debates.

PS/69/2022/PS/82/202 · ge (art. 63 CPP)

Prosecutor Recusal Motions Based on Procedural Rulings Rejected

Cited in the reasoning regarding the continuation of the hearing in the appellant's absence, but not explicitly in the final orders.

SBE.2021.61 · ag (Art. 63 Abs. 1 StPO)

Mask Mandate Appeal: Appearance Despite Non-Compliance

Cited as the legal basis for the court's decision regarding the procedural measure of excluding the appellant from the hearing to ensure safety and order.

SBE.2021.61 · ag (Art. 63 Abs. 2 StPO)

Mask Mandate Appeal: Appearance Despite Non-Compliance

Cited as the legal basis for the court's decision regarding the procedural measure of warning and potentially excluding individuals from the hearing.

SBE.2021.61 · ag (Art. 63 Abs. 4 StPO)

Mask Mandate Appeal: Appearance Despite Non-Compliance

Cited as the legal basis for continuing the proceedings despite the exclusion of a party.

STBER.2018.57 · so (Art. 63 StPO)

State v. Defendant: Affirmation of Attempted Intentional Homicide Despite Diminished Capacity

Cited in the overall list of applied articles, likely concerning the costs or procedure.

BES.2018.57 · bs (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO)

Prosecutor's Seizure of Devices and Cash Upheld in Violence Investigation

This provision is the general basis for seizure to cover costs (mentioned in the context of Art. 268).

D.cision.2018.426 · vd (Art. 63 al. 1 CPP)

Prosecutor Recusal Denial Based on Hearing Management and File Access

Cited in the reasoning to justify the prosecutor's actions during the hearing, which informed the decision to reject the recusal request.

60.2017.13 · ti (art. 63 CPP)

Appellant v. Prosecutor Regarding Electronic Device Access During Witness Interrogation

Cited in the grounds for the final decision, although its application was interpreted restrictively regarding an absolute ban on electronic devices.

Jug.2016.435 · vd (art. 63 CPP)

Qualified Robbery Conviction Upheld Despite Insufficient Evidence for Knife Threat Allegation

Cited in the concluding section listing the applicable articles.