Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 33 Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Foro in caso di concorso di più persone

CPP; Titolo secondo: Autorità penali; Capitolo 3: Foro
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (478 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 33 CPP · Foro in caso di concorso di più persone

I compartecipi sono perseguiti e giudicati dalle autorità competenti per il perseguimento e il giudizio dell’autore.

Se il reato è stato commesso da più autori, sono competenti le autorità del luogo in cui sono stati compiuti i primi atti di perseguimento.

← Art. 32 CPP Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Campo d’applicazione Art. 34 CPP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (222)

RBOG.2018.Nr.12 · tg (Art. 33 StPO)
Refusal to Unify Separate Drug Offense Proceedings Against Alleged Co-Perpetrators
Mentioned as a rule governing jurisdiction when offenses span different cantons, although the specific application was ultimately superseded.
BG.2026.20 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)
Jurisdictional Dispute: Nidwalden vs. Aargau on Drug Trafficking Investigation
Used to determine the competent jurisdiction as the place where the first investigative measures were taken.
BG.2025.85 (Art. 33 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Vaud Designated Competent Canton for Robbery Case
Cited in conjunction with Art. 34 al. 1 CPP to determine the legal venue based on the location of the first prosecution acts.
BG.2025.71 (art. 33-37 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Rules Lucerne Competent to Prosecute Sexual Assault Case
These articles are mentioned as governing special forums in criminal procedure, which are then discussed in relation to the general rule.
BG.2025.67 (art. 33 al. 1 CPP)
Federal Court Affirms Bern's Jurisdiction in Human Trafficking Case
This provision states that participants in an offense are prosecuted and judged by the authority prosecuting and judging the perpetrator.
BG.2025.67 (art. 33 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Court Affirms Bern's Jurisdiction in Human Trafficking Case
This provision applies when several co-perpetrators commit an offense in different locations, determining jurisdiction based on where the first prosecution acts were undertaken.
BG.2025.51 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Basel-Stadt v. Basel-Landschaft on Co-Perpetration
This provision addresses the principle of 'forum praeventionis' (priority jurisdiction), which was applied to grant jurisdiction to the canton that first initiated proceedings for similar offenses.
BG.2025.60 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)
St. Gallen Jurisdiction over Cross-Cantonal Theft by Asylum Seekers
Applied to determine the competent jurisdiction when multiple perpetrators have committed an offense.
BG.2025.49 (Art. 33 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Denies Jurisdiction Transfer in COVID-19 Loan Fraud Case
This article is mentioned in conjunction with Article 34 al. 1 CPP for cases involving multiple accused committing different offenses in multiple cantons.
BG.2025.34 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Bern v. Zurich
This provision is combined with Art. 34 Abs. 1 StPO to determine that, as a rule, all co-perpetrators are prosecuted where one of the co-perpetrators committed the offense punishable by the heaviest penalty.
SK.2025.9 (Art. 74 Abs. 2 StBOG i.V.m. Art. 33 f. StPO)
CO2 Emissions Tax Fraud and Bribery Scheme
Cited for designating the Canton of Bern as the canton for serving sentences.
BG.2025.8 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)
Jurisdiction over Fraud and Forgery Case: St. Gallen's Authority Upheld
Applied to determine the competent authority in cases of joint commission of offenses in different cantons, focusing on the place where the most serious offense was committed or where prosecution first began.
BG.2025.8 (Art. 33 StPO)
Jurisdiction over Fraud and Forgery Case: St. Gallen's Authority Upheld
Discussed in relation to the arguments of the Canton of Vaud, questioning its applicability.
BG.2025.42 (Art. 33 al. 1 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court: Bern Competent to Prosecute Vaudois Criminal Case Involving Human Trafficking Allegations
Cited regarding the prosecution and judgment of participants in an offense.
BG.2025.42 (Art. 33 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court: Bern Competent to Prosecute Vaudois Criminal Case Involving Human Trafficking Allegations
Cited regarding the jurisdiction when several co-perpetrators commit an offense.