Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 280 Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Scopo dell’impiego di apparecchi tecnici di sorveglianza

CPP; Titolo quinto: Provvedimenti coercitivi; Capitolo 8: Misure di sorveglianza segrete
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (478 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 280 CPP · Scopo dell’impiego di apparecchi tecnici di sorveglianza

Il pubblico ministero può avvalersi di apparecchi tecnici di sorveglianza per: a. intercettare o registrare comunicazioni o conversazioni private; b. osservare o registrare eventi in luoghi privati o non accessibili al pubblico; c. accertare dove si trovano persone o cose.

← Art. 279 CPP Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Campo d’applicazione Art. 281 CPP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (620)

P/21494/2024 · ge (art. 280 al. 1 let. a et b cum 269 al. 1 CPP)
State v. Defendant (Cross-Border Cocaine Trafficking Surveillance)
This provision defines the legal conditions under which public prosecutors can use technical surveillance devices, which the court implicitly confirmed were met by rejecting the appeal.
BB.2024.66 (art. 280 let. c CPP)
Espionage Suspect's Appeal Against Surveillance Rejected
Cited as the legal basis for the use of technical surveillance devices for locating a person or thing, and used to assess the conditions for its ordering.
SBK.2023.31 · ag (Art. 280 lit. a StPO)
Acoustic Surveillance and Foreign Data Use Upheld
Cited as the permissible purpose for the technical (acoustic) surveillance.
2019.04.02.sr.4 · bl (Art. 280 StPO)
Unlawful Surveillance Due to Insufficient "Catalog Offense" Threshold
The court annulled the decision of the criminal proceedings court because the conditions for using technical surveillance devices under this article were not met due to the absence of a 'Katalogtat'.
BK 2017 447 · be (Art. 280 let. c CPP)
Admissibility of Fortuitously Discovered Evidence from Unrelated Surveillance
The initial surveillance measure (GPS tracking) was based on this provision, which the Tribunal found not applicable to the discovered offenses.
2016.12.06.1 · bl (Art. 280 StPO)
Retroactive GPS Vehicle Tracking Unauthorized
The court did not enter a decision on the request for approval because there was no order according to this article.
350.16.585 · bl (Art. 280 StPO)
Retroactive GPS Surveillance Request Denied for Lack of Prior Authorization
The court did not enter a ruling on the application for approval because there was no order from the public prosecutor's office according to this article.
2013.09.24.1 · bl (Art. 280 StPO)
Jurisdiction over Covert Surveillance Authorization and Property Entry
The order for the use of technical surveillance equipment is issued by the public prosecutor's office.
350.13.745 · bl (Art. 280 StPO)
Jurisdiction Over Surveillance Authorization and Entry Consent
The court confirms that the order for the use of technical surveillance devices is issued by the public prosecutor's office.
INC.2009.58303 · ti (art. 280 ss CPP)
Denial of Provisional Release Pending Trial Due to Flight Risk and Evidence of Guilt
Cited as relevant legislation in the preamble to the decision, although not strictly applied in the dispositive orders (which only cite procedural and cost rules).
INC.2009.903 · ti (art. 280 ss CPP)
Claimant Status in Criminal Proceedings for Theft and Money Laundering Appeal
Cited as applicable procedural norm in the final decision context, relating to the review of the complaint.
INC.2009.38905 · ti (art. 280 CPP)
Accused Challenges Denial of Psychiatric Evaluation and Restriction on Visits
This procedural article was cited in the preamble to the decision ('P.Q.M.') related to the procedural context of the appeal.
INC.2009.26504 · ti (Art. 280 ss. CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Aggravated Drug Offenses
Cited in the operative part as a general applicable procedural rule supporting the decision to grant the extension of pre-trial detention.
INC.2009.46803 · ti (art. 280 ss CPP)
Detention Upheld Despite Confessions Due to Recidivism Risk and Ongoing Investigation
Cited in the final decision section as part of the legal basis concerning appeals against the decision.
INC.2009.17004 · ti (art. 280ss CPP)
Extension of Pretrial Detention for Repeated Sexual Abuse of Minors and Incapacitated Persons
Cited in the dispositive in relation to procedural rules for appeals.