312.0 STPOCPP

CH

Art. 271 Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Salvaguardia del segreto professionale

CPP; Titolo quinto: Provvedimenti coercitivi; Capitolo 8: Misure di sorveglianza segrete

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (478 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 271 CPP · Salvaguardia del segreto professionale

In caso di sorveglianza di una persona appartenente a una delle categorie professionali di cui agli articoli 170–173, la cernita delle informazioni estranee all’oggetto delle indagini e al motivo per cui tale persona è posta sotto sorveglianza deve essere svolta sotto la direzione di un giudice. La cernita è effettuata in modo che l’autorità di perseguimento penale non venga a conoscenza di fatti coperti dal segreto professionale. I dati scartati devono essere immediatamente distrutti; non possono essere utilizzati.

La cernita delle informazioni secondo il capoverso 1 non è necessaria se: a. sussiste un grave sospetto nei confronti della persona vincolata dal segreto professionale; e b. ragioni particolari lo esigono.

Non appena è stabilito che altre persone sorvegliate comunicano con una delle persone menzionate negli articoli 170–173, deve essere eseguita, conformemente al capoverso 1, una cernita delle informazioni concernenti le comunicazioni con questa persona. Le informazioni in merito alle quali una persona menzionata negli articoli 170–173 potrebbe rifiutarsi di deporre devono essere tolte dal fascicolo e devono essere immediatamente distrutte; non possono essere utilizzate.

← Art. 270 CPP Codice di diritto processuale penale svizzero (CPP) - Campo d’applicazione Art. 272 CPP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (55)

BB.2018.188 (Art. 271 CPP)

Wiretap upheld: Applicant's involvement sufficiently suspected.

This article concerns the procedures for handling information subject to professional secrecy during surveillance.

2016.12.23.1 · bl (Art. 271 Abs. 3 StPO)

Prosecutor's Application for Retroactive Mobile Phone Monitoring Granted

This provision is cited concerning the segregation and immediate destruction of information belonging to third parties over whom the witness could refuse testimony.

2016.12.23.2 · bl (Art. 271 Abs. 3 StPO)

Retroactive Mobile Phone Surveillance Approved for Serious Crimes Investigation

Cited in the dispositive regarding the exclusion and destruction of information from persons other than the monitored individual, concerning whom they could refuse to testify.

350.16.635 · bl (Art. 271 Abs. 3 StPO)

Retroactive Phone Surveillance Approved in Theft and Vandalism Probe

Rule for the exclusion and destruction of information from persons who could refuse to testify.

350.2016.634 · bl (Art. 271 Abs. 3 StPO)

Retroactive Phone Surveillance Authorized for Theft Suspect

This provision is cited in the second dispositive order concerning the exclusion and destruction of information from persons who could refuse to testify.

2011.12.05.1 · bl (Art. 271 Abs. 2 lit. a StPO)

Preliminary Surveillance Authorization Despite Deficient Documentation in Serious Robbery Case

Cited as a requirement provisionally met for granting the real-time surveillance, relating to the absence of a strong suspicion against a professional secrecy holder.

350.2011.559 · bl (Art. 271 Abs. 2 lit. a StPO)

Provisional Surveillance Authorization Granted Despite Insufficient Evidence Due to Severity of Suspected Crime

Cited to establish the preliminary conditions for direct connection, specifically that there is no urgent suspicion against a holder of professional secrecy.

AK.2011.82 · sg (Art. 271 Abs. 3 StPO)

Attorney-Client Privilege: Mandatory Exclusion and Destruction of Surveillance Recordings

Cited as the legal basis for the mandatory exclusion and immediate destruction of information covered by professional secrecy during surveillance of third parties.

AK.2011.82 · sg (Art. 271 Abs. 3 StPO)

In re: Deletion of Privileged Attorney-Client Communications from Investigation File Following Telecommunication Surveillance

This provision mandates the separation and immediate destruction of information subject to professional secrecy (like lawyer-client communications) derived from surveillance.

17.2010.32 · ti (art. 271 lett. a CPP TI)

Vehicle Ownership Dispute in Criminal Context

The referral to the civil court for RI 1's claim was justified because the object had already passed into the hands of a third party to the crime.

Arr.t.2010.1654 · vd (art. 271 al. 2 CPP)

Appeal on Insult Conviction and Assault Dismissal

This article is cited to explain the effect of the opposition which brought the entire case before the Tribunal d'accusation.

Arr.t.2010.1469 · vd (Art. 271 CPP)

Defendant's Opposition Nullifies Recourse on Defense Fees, Triggers Full Review of Conviction

Listed at the top, likely related to the overall procedure governing this stage, although not explicitly named in the final orders themselves.

10.2009.585 · ti (art. 271 cpv 1; 9 e segg., 273 e segg. CPP)

Child Support Non-Payment Conviction and Fine

Cited in the preamble before the operative part, indicating the procedural framework, although the specific procedural rules applied in the dispositive are primarily related to costs/notifications.

Arr.t.2010.1164 · vd (art. 271 CPP)

Public Prosecutor v. Accused: Aggression Charge Reinstated on Appeal

The court used this article to establish its competence to rule on the opposition against the combined order of conviction and non-lieu.

Arr.t.2010.1143 · vd (Art. 271 et 272 CPP)

Combined Condemnation and Non-Lieu Order on Alien Violations Following Timely Opposition

Cited to confirm that the appeal filed by one party brought the entire case before the Court of Assizes.