291
IPRGLDIP
CH
CH
Art. 190 Legge federale del 18 dicembre 1987 sul diritto internazionale privato (LDIP)
LDIP; Capitolo 12: Arbitrato internazionale; IX. Carattere definitivo, impugnazione, revisione; 1. Impugnazione
Art. 190 LDIP
Notificato che sia, il lodo è definitivo.
Il lodo può essere impugnato soltanto se: a. l’arbitro unico è stato nominato irregolarmente o il tribunale arbitrale è stato costituito irregolarmente; b. il tribunale arbitrale si è dichiarato, a torto, competente o incompetente; c. il tribunale arbitrale ha deciso punti litigiosi che non gli erano stati sottoposti o ha omesso di giudicare determinate conclusioni; d. è stato violato il principio della parità di trattamento delle parti o il loro diritto di essere sentite; e. è incompatibile con l’ordine pubblico.
Le decisioni pregiudiziali possono essere impugnate soltanto in virtù del capoverso 2 lettere a e b; il termine di ricorso decorre dalla notificazione della decisione.
Il termine di ricorso è di 30 giorni dalla notificazione del lodo.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)
BGE 152 III 181 (Art. 190 Abs. 2 lit. b IPRG)
International football employment dispute: contractual clause referring disputes to "competent court" prevails over FIFA arbitration jurisdiction under RSTP and CAS appeal rules.
Main ground for the verdict; the Swiss Federal Supreme Court upheld the challenge against the arbitral award for lack of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.
BGE 151 III 53 (Art. 190 al. 2 let. e LDIP)
Anti-doping sanction for minor athlete: young age as protected person does not mandate reduced four-year suspension for intentional violation under substantive public policy.
Main ground for dismissing the appeal, as the Federal Tribunal found the arbitral award did not violate substantive public policy.
4A_292/2025 (Art. 190 al. 2 let. e LDIP)
Cyclist’s four-year doping ban and salary-based fine upheld under arbitral award; use of illegally obtained evidence and presumption of innocence rejected as inconsistent with procedural public order.
Main ground for rejecting the appeal: the challenged award was found not to violate procedural or substantive public order.
4A_294/2025 (Art. 190 Abs. 2 lit. d IPRG)
Swiss Challenge to ICC Award Dismissed as Inadmissible: Alleged Surprise Reliance on Long-Standing Business Relationship and Ignored Price/Bankruptcy Arguments Do Not Amount to Right to Be Heard Violation under Article 190(2)(d) PILA
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the alleged violation of the right to be heard, the sole ground raised, was not substantiated.
C/19744/2019 · ge (art. 190 al. 2 let. b LDIP)
Claim for Interest Reimbursement Subject to Arbitration Agreement
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the full review power of a higher court against an arbitral award concerning jurisdiction.
4A_248/2019 (Art. 190 al. 2 let. e LDIP)
Arbitral Award Upholding IAAF Testosterone Regulations for Female Athletes with Differences of Sex Development Survives Public Policy Review
Main ground for dismissing the appeal; the court reviewed the arbitral award for incompatibility with substantive public order and found none.
4A_132/2016 (Art. 190 Abs. 2 lit. e IPRG)
Football player's summary termination for unpaid salary: arbitral interpretation of contractual 90-day grace period under FIFA regulations survives substantive public policy review.
Sole ground for dismissing the appeal: no violation of substantive public policy found in the arbitral award.
ZK.2013.10 · bs (Art. 190 Abs. 2 lit. b IPRG)
Appointment of Arbitrator Amidst Contractual Succession Dispute
Cited to explain that no federal appeal is available against the positive decision to appoint an arbitrator.
VPB 06-0698-4469 (Art. 190, al. 2, let. b, LDIP)
Swiss Arbitration: Tribunal Jurisdiction Overrides Foreign Court Actions
This article is cited as the basis for the immediate appeal to the Federal Tribunal regarding the arbitral tribunal's decision on its jurisdiction.
PN040217 · zh (Art. 190 IPRG)
Appealability of Intermediate Arbitral Award on Defect Notification Timeliness
This provision on the grounds for appeal against an arbitral award was mentioned in the context of the Federal Supreme Court's jurisprudence on appealability.
12.2004.181 · ti (art. 190 cpv. 2 LDIP)
Nullity Appeal Dismissed: International Arbitration Rules Govern Over Cantonal Jurisdiction
Cited to define the grounds for challenging an award under international arbitration law, contrasting with the appellant's reliance on the CIA.
VV020035 · zh (Art. 190 IPRG)
Arbitrator Impartiality Challenge in International Arbitration
Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement for timely notification of a challenge.
14.1997.75 · ti (Art. 190 cpv. 1 LDIP)
Enforceability of Non-Suspended Swiss Arbitral Award During Appeal.
This provision, concerning the finality and enforceability of an arbitral award upon notification, was cited as the basis for upholding the definitive rejection of the opposition (ground for the verdict).
14.1997.76 · ti (art. 190 cpv. 1 LDIP)
Enforcement of Non-Exequatur Swiss Arbitral Award Pending Appeal
Cited as a basis for confirming that the arbitral award was definitive and enforceable upon notification, justifying the rejection of the appeal.