291
IPRGLDIP
CH
CH
Art. 128 Legge federale del 18 dicembre 1987 sul diritto internazionale privato (LDIP)
LDIP; Capitolo 9: Diritto delle obbligazioni; II. Diritto applicabile
Art. 128 LDIP
Le pretese derivanti da indebito arricchimento sottostanno al diritto regolatore del rapporto giuridico, esistente o presunto, in base al quale è avvenuto l’arricchimento.
In mancanza di tale rapporto, le pretese derivanti da indebito arricchimento sono regolate dal diritto dello Stato in cui si è prodotto l’arricchimento; le parti possono pattuire l’applicazione del diritto del foro.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)
C/16442/2013 · ge (art. 128 LDIP)
Appeal on Fraudulent Contracts and Jurisdictional Limits
This article concerning claims based on unjust enrichment was cited in relation to the applicable law.
BZ.2008.3 · sg (Art. 128 IPRG)
Claimant's Legitimacy to Sue Bank Accounts vs. Void Loan Agreements Under German Law
Cited as the rule determining that claims arising from unjust enrichment are governed by the law applicable to the purported legal relationship (the void loan agreement).
BZ.2009.27 · sg (Art. 128 Abs. 2 IPRG)
Jurisdiction and Unjust Enrichment Claims Under Lugano Convention and National Laws
The rule applied by the court to determine the applicable law for unjust enrichment claims when no existing legal relationship between the parties is present.
BZ.2007.56 · sg (Art. 128 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Set-Off of Unauthorized Debit Claim Against Suretyship Obligation Under Austrian Law
This article was considered in relation to the applicable law for unjust enrichment claims connected to a pre-existing legal relationship.
BZ.2007.56 · sg (Art. 128 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Debtor v. Bank: Surety Set-Off Dispute Governed by Austrian Law
Cited in the reasoning concerning the applicable law for unjust enrichment claims.
14.2004.17 · ti (art. 128, 133, 158 LDIP)
Vessel Charter Overpayment Seizure Upheld on Fraudulent Enrichment Claim
Cited as the provisions of the Swiss Private International Law Act relevant to determining applicable law for unjust enrichment.
14.2000.00126 · ti (Art. 128 LDIP)
Creditor v. Niece: Sequestration of Assets for Unjust Enrichment
Cited to determine the applicable law for the unjust enrichment claim.
14.2004.17 · ti (Art. 128 LDIP)
Creditor Attachment of Debtor Assets Upheld Based on Probable Unjust Enrichment Claim Arising from Fraudulent Charter Fees
Cited in the final pronouncement regarding the conflict of laws rule concerning unjust enrichment claims.