291 IPRGLDIP

CH

Art. 109 Legge federale del 18 dicembre 1987 sul diritto internazionale privato (LDIP)

LDIP; Capitolo 8: Diritti immateriali; I. Competenza

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (247 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 109 LDIP

Per le azioni concernenti la validità o l’iscrizione di diritti immateriali in Svizzera sono competenti i tribunali svizzeri del domicilio del convenuto. Se il convenuto non è domiciliato in Svizzera, sono competenti i tribunali svizzeri della sede commerciale del rappresentante iscritto nel registro o, se manca un tale rappresentante, quelli della sede dell’autorità svizzera del registro.

Per le azioni concernenti la violazione di diritti immateriali sono competenti i tribunali svizzeri del domicilio del convenuto o, in mancanza di domicilio, quelli del luogo di dimora abituale del convenuto. Inoltre sono competenti i tribunali svizzeri del luogo dell’atto o dell’evento e, per le azioni concernenti l’attività di una stabile organizzazione in Svizzera, i tribunali della sede di tale organizzazione.

Il capoverso 2 si applica per analogia alle azioni concernenti i diritti al compenso previsti dalla legge per l’utilizzazione lecita di un bene immateriale.

...

← Art. 108d LDIP Legge federale del 18 dicembre 1987 sul diritto internazionale privato (LDIP) Art. 110 LDIP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (19)

HG 2024 32 · be (Art. 109 Abs. 2 IPRG)

Lack of Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement Case

The court used this provision to determine the local jurisdiction based on the place of occurrence (Erfolgsort) for the claim regarding intellectual property infringement, although ultimately finding no jurisdiction.

O2023-012 (Art. 109 Abs. 1 IPRG)

Patent for Avalanche Transceiver Partially Validated After Court Narrows Claims

This article is cited to establish the court's jurisdiction based on the representative's place of business.

S2024-003 (Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3 und Art. 31 LugÜ sowie aus Art. 10 und Art. 109 Abs. 2 IPRG)

Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

These provisions establish the territorial jurisdiction of the Federal Patent Court for the measure proceedings.

HG 2022 74 · be (Art. 109 Abs. 1 IPRG)

Trademark Nullity Based on Likelihood of Confusion (Lucky Mark)

Used in the reasoning to establish the local jurisdiction of the Bern Commercial Court, though not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders 1-5.

O2020-014 (Art. 109 Abs. 2 IPRG)

Patent Dismissed Over Mobile Symbol Transmission Claims

Cited for establishing the jurisdiction of Swiss courts in international civil matters.

O2021-009--O2021-010 (Art. 109 Abs. 1 IPRG)

Federal Patent Court Invalidates Swiss Portions of EP Patents 127 and 105

Determines jurisdiction for patent validity cases based on registration location.

C/6464/2018 · ge (art. 109 al. 1 LDIP)

Textile Company v. Chinese Company: Trademark Nullification Due to Likelihood of Confusion

Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Swiss courts based on the location of the agent listed in the register.

O2015-018 (art. 109 LDIP)

Patent Validity and Ownership Dispute Dismissed

Cited to regulate international jurisdiction for intellectual property disputes.

S2017-006 (Art. 109 Abs. 2 IPRG)

Pharmaceutical Company v. Competitor: Supplementary Protection Certificate Infringement

Cited in the reasoning as a basis for jurisdiction of the Federal Patent Court.

O2015-004 (Art. 109 Abs. 2 IPRG)

Patent Holder's Prosecution History Limits Scope of Equivalence for Generic Drug

This provision was cited in relation to the jurisdiction of Swiss courts in cases involving foreign defendants, specifically regarding the place of action and effect.

C/11533/2014 · ge (Art. 109 al. 1 ch. 2 LDIP)

Bank Pledge Extinguished by Debt Repayment After Seizure

Cited in the reasoning to establish venue (competence ratione loci) for the initial claim, which was not overturned in the dispositive.

C/1850/2015 · ge (art. 109 al. 2 LDIP)

IKKS v. IKKII Trademark Infringement and Cancellation

Used to establish the Court's jurisdiction over the action for cessation of infringement based on the place of the act or result (internet sales in Switzerland).

C/26345/2014 · ge (Art. 109 al. 2 LDIP)

Trademark Holder v. Counterfeiters (Domain Blocking)

Applied, along with Art. 10 let. a LDIP, to establish the international jurisdiction of Swiss courts regarding provisional measures related to intellectual property violations via websites.

ZK.2014.14 · bs (Art. 109 Abs. 2 IPRG)

Design Infringement Appeal Regarding Smartwatch Designs and Prior Art

Cited in the reasoning determining international jurisdiction regarding IP rights.

C/26345/2014 · ge (Art. 109 al. 2 LDIP)

Trademark Holder v. Foreign Entities (Domain Blocking Injunction Denial)

The court found *prima facie* international jurisdiction based on the location of the act or result of the infringement concerning IP rights via the internet.