Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
281.1 SCHKGLPLEF CH

Art. 95 Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF)

LEF; Titolo terzo: Della esecuzione in via di pignoramento; I. Del pignoramento; A. Esecuzione; 7. Ordine del pignoramento; a. In generale
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (404 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 95 LEF

Si devono pignorare in primo luogo i beni mobili, compresi i crediti e le pretese limitatamente pignorabili (art. 93). Sono pignorati anzitutto gli oggetti di commercio quotidiano, ma i meno necessari prima degli indispensabili.

I beni immobili possono essere pignorati soltanto in quanto quelli mobili non bastino a coprire il credito.

Da ultimo sono pignorati gli oggetti colpiti da sequestro, quelli indicati dal debitore come appartenenti a terzi e quelli rivendicati da terzi.

Ove siano pignorate provviste di foraggi, si dovrà pignorare, a richiesta del debitore, anche una corrispondente quantità di bestiame.

L’ufficiale può scostarsi da quest’ordine qualora le circostanze lo giustifichino o se il creditore e il debitore di comune accordo lo richiedono.

In ogni caso il funzionario deve conciliare, per quanto sia possibile, gli interessi del creditore e quelli del debitore.

← Art. 94 LEF Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF) Art. 95a LEF →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (186)

ZZ.1986.12 · so (Art. 95 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Supervisory Authority Overturns Seizure of Contingent Football Transfer Fees
This provision is cited in the headnote summarizing the core legal issue regarding the non-seizability of transfer sums.
A/603/2025 · ge (art. 95 LP)
Debtor's Challenge to Seizure of Unlisted Shares Rejected in Favor of Creditors' Interest
The complaint was rejected because the seizure of E______ SA shares complied with the criteria for prioritizing assets under this article.
A/164/2025 · ge (art. 95 al. 1 et 2 LP)
Creditor Challenge to Bailiff's Seizure Prioritization
The rejection of the appeal was based on the fact that the seizure complied with the order prescribed by this article regarding the hierarchy of assets seized.
A/164/2025 · ge (art. 95 al. 4bis LP)
Creditor Challenge to Bailiff's Seizure Prioritization
The Office's decision to waive the seizure of real estate was justified under the discretionary power granted by this provision.
15.2024.67 · ti (art. 95 LEF)
Heir's Interest Realization Upon Seizure of Inherited Estate Subject to Tax Debts
Cited in the reasoning as the criterion for indicating the most appropriate solution (direct seizure of the bank account).
A/1176/2024 · ge (art. 95 al. 3 LP)
Enforcement Office Seizure of Sole Proprietorship Funds Upheld Despite Beneficial Ownership Claim
The claim was rejected because the Office could not refrain from seizing the credit, as no other disposable asset existed.
A/3937/2023 · ge (art. 95 al. 1 et 2 LP)
Challenging Excessive Property Seizure Valuation
Cited in the reasoning as the general order of seizure from which the Office may depart based on the findings.
A/3937/2023 · ge (art. 95 al. 4bis LP)
Challenging Excessive Property Seizure Valuation
Applied by the court to guide the Cantonal Enforcement Office on limiting the seizure after the valuation is completed.
PS230201 · zh (Art. 95 Abs. 3 SchKG)
Canton v. Company: Annulment of Enforcement Based on Overturned Precedent
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for not awarding a procedural indemnity to the respondent.
15.2023.37 · ti (Art. 95 LEF)
Debtor's Appeal Against Income Seizure Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure for executing the garnishment.
15.2023.19 · ti (art. 95 cpv. 1 LEF)
Supervisory Authority Decision Upheld in Maintenance Arrears Enforcement Case Regarding Disposable Income Calculation and Asset Seizure
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's challenge to the seizure of the real estate quota instead of the movable property (soil deposit).
A/1451/2023 · ge (art. 95 al. 1 et 2 LP)
Creditor Challenge to Seizure Order Regarding Vehicle Seizure and Calculation of Living Expenses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the priority order for seizure of movable property over real estate.
A/1451/2023 · ge (art. 95 al. 4bis LP)
Creditor Challenge to Seizure Order Regarding Vehicle Seizure and Calculation of Living Expenses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding deviations from the priority order of seizure.
A/1451/2023 · ge (art. 95 al. 5 LP)
Creditor Challenge to Seizure Order Regarding Vehicle Seizure and Calculation of Living Expenses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the need to reconcile the interests of the creditor and the debtor during seizure.
15.2023.6 · ti (Art. 95 LEF)
Appeal Against Seizure Exceeding Enforcement Decree Amount
Cited in reasoning point 3.1 and 3.3 regarding the order of seizure assets (accounts before real estate).