281.1 SCHKGLPLEF

CH

Art. 65 Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF)

LEF; Titolo secondo: Della esecuzione; IV. Della notificazione degli atti esecutivi; B. Alle persone giuridiche, società ed eredità indivise

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (404 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 65 LEF

Se l’esecuzione è diretta contro una persona giuridica o contro una società, la notificazione si fa al rappresentante delle medesime, e cioè: 1. per un Comune, un Cantone o la Confederazione, al presidente dell’autorità esecutiva, o al servizio designato da quest’autorità; 2. per una società anonima, una società in accomandita per azioni, una società a garanzia limitata, una società cooperativa o un’associazione iscritta nel registro di commercio, a qualunque membro dell’amministrazione o della direzione, come pure a qualunque direttore o procuratore; 3. per altra persona giuridica, al presidente dell’amministrazione o all’amministratore; 4. per una società in nome collettivo o in accomandita, a qualunque socio amministratore ed a qualunque direttore e procuratore .

Ove però le ricordate persone non si trovino in ufficio, la notificazione si potrà fare ad altro funzionario od impiegato.

Se l’esecuzione è diretta contro un’eredità non divisa, la notificazione si fa al rappresentante dell’eredità o se questi non è conosciuto ad uno degli eredi.

← Art. 64 LEF Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF) Art. 66 LEF →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (183)

A/2504/2025 · ge (Art. 65 et 66 LP)

Complaint Challenging Bankruptcy Notice Based on Invalid Service of Payment Order

These articles were cited in the reasoning concluding that the notification by publication was in conformity with them, justifying the rejection of the complaint.

BA 2025 50 · zg (Art. 65 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 SchKG)

Appeal Against Validity of Objection to Enforcement Order Based on Lack of Representative Authority

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding service of enforcement documents on corporations.

BA 2025 50 · zg (Art. 65 Abs. 2 SchKG)

Appeal Against Validity of Objection to Enforcement Order Based on Lack of Representative Authority

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding service of enforcement documents on corporations when representatives are absent.

BA 2025 50 · zg (Art. 65 SchKG)

Appeal Against Validity of Objection to Enforcement Order Based on Lack of Representative Authority

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding who is authorized to receive the payment order.

SCBES.2025.84 · so (Art. 65 Abs. 1 Ziffer 2 SchKG)

Supervisory Authority Affirming Bankruptcy Order Due to Improper Representation

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the validity of service, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

PS250083 · zh (Art. 65 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 SchKG)

Improper Service on Minor Leads to Bankruptcy Dismissal and Fee Confirmation

Cited in the reasoning section regarding service of payment orders on a GmbH.

PS250083 · zh (Art. 65 Abs. 2 SchKG)

Improper Service on Minor Leads to Bankruptcy Dismissal and Fee Confirmation

Cited in the reasoning section regarding service of payment orders on a GmbH.

SBK 2024 68 · gr (art. 65 cpv. 1 n. 2 LEF)

Bankruptcy Declaration Upheld Despite Debt Repayment

Cited to confirm that the executive instruments (payment order) were correctly served according to the procedure for legal entities.

A/3563/2024 · ge (art. 65 al. 1 ch. 2 et al. 2, 72 et 161 LP)

Challenge to Bankruptcy Warning Notification Validity and Timeliness

Although not the basis for the final order (which was inadmissibility), these provisions were cited to rule that the notification procedure would have been deemed compliant had the appeal been admissible.

A/3519/2023 · ge (art. 65 LP)

Improper Service of Payment Order Invalidates Subsequent Bankruptcy Proceedings

The court used this provision to determine the validity of the notification to the legal entity, as the decision on the complaint hinged on whether the notification followed the rules for service on legal entities.

BA 2024 39 · zg (Art. 65 Abs. 1 SchKG)

Creditor Service Invalid Due to Dual Representation Conflict of Interest

This article was used in the reasoning to explain the general rules for service on a legal entity, but it is not cited in the dispositive orders.

A/1034/2024 · ge (art. 65 al. 3 LP)

Bankruptcy Estate v. Enforcement Office: Refusal of Debt Collection Notice by Public Notice

Cited regarding the procedure for notifying a claim against an estate by serving one heir (Point 3.1.2).

15.2024.17 · ti (art. 65 cpv. 2 LEF)

Appeal of Bankruptcy Claim Inclusion Based on Insufficient Procedural Verification

Cited in the final orders (order 1) concerning the procedure for publishing the modification of the schedules following the acceptance of the appeal.

93/2024/6 · sh (Art. 65 Abs. 3 SchKG)

Creditor's Selective Service on Undivided Estate Heir Constitutes Abuse of Rights

Cited as the general rule for service in proceedings against an undivided estate, from which the court deviated due to abuse of rights.

BA 2024 8 · zg (Art. 65 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 SchKG)

Void Payment Order Due to Improper Service

Basis for determining that the bailiff's substitute service was not permissible because the recipient (E.________) was not an authorized representative.