281.1 SCHKGLPLEF

CH

Art. 4 Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF)

LEF; Titolo primo: Disposizioni generali; I. Della organizzazione; C. Assistenza

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (404 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 4 LEF

Gli uffici d’esecuzione e gli uffici dei fallimenti procedono alle operazioni di loro competenza su richiesta degli uffici, delle amministrazioni speciali del fallimento, come pure dei commissari e dei liquidatori di un altro circondario.

Gli uffici, le amministrazioni speciali del fallimento, i commissari e i liquidatori possono procedere ad atti del loro ufficio anche al di fuori del loro circondario, se l’ufficio competente per territorio vi acconsente. La competenza per la notificazione degli atti esecutivi che non avvenga per posta, per il pignoramento, per la vendita agli incanti e per la richiesta d’intervento della forza pubblica spetta tuttavia unicamente all’ufficio dove l’atto deve essere compiuto.

← Art. 3 LEF Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF) Art. 4a LEF →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (35)

A/3817/2024 · ge (Art. 4 al. 1 LP)

Company v. Canton Regarding Invalid Asset Seizure Delegation

This article served as the procedural basis for the delegation of the enforcement action from one debt collection office to another, which was central to the dispute.

105 2025 1 · fr (art. 4 LP)

Partner's Removal as Property Administrator Upheld Due to Mismanagement and Conflict of Interest

Cited to establish the competence of the Office for the legal management of property.

PS230251 · zh (Art. 4 SchKG)

Enforcement Office Standing to Appeal Inter-Office Fee Invoices

Cited in the reasoning to define the scope of judicial assistance between collection offices.

A/3307/2022 · ge (art. 4 al. 1 LP)

Creditor Enforcement and Territorial Competence Over Assets in Another Canton

Mentioned in the reasoning (consid. 3.1) as part of the legal framework for execution via mutual assistance, which is the core of the admitted appeal.

OG AB 21 22 · ar (Art. 4 SchKG)

Debtor's Appeal of Enforcement Order Dismissed Despite Real Estate Sale Obstruction, Partial Upholding on Movable Asset Seizure

Cited as the basis for carrying out the seizure of assets located elsewhere via legal assistance.

15.2021.134 · ti (art. 4 LEF)

Tax Seizure and Vital Minimum Challenge Appeal

Cited regarding the objection to the assistance measure by the Lugano office to the Scuol office.

105 2019 207 · fr (art. 4 al. 1 LP)

Jurisdiction in Property Seizure Execution Between Cantons

Cited in the reasoning concerning the obligation of the requested office to assist.

105 2019 207 · fr (art. 4 al. 2 LP)

Jurisdiction in Property Seizure Execution Between Cantons

Cited in the reasoning concerning the exclusive competence of the collection office for seizures.

15.2016.47 · ti (art. 4 LEF)

Creditor v. Execution Office Regarding Certificate of Insufficient Assets

Cited in the operative part as the basis for the procedure (rogatory letter) the Executive Office must follow for further investigation.

AbR.2010.11.Nr.10 · ow (Art. 4 SchKG)

Debt Enforcement Office Fees for Inter-Office Service Reduced

Cited regarding the requirement for the office initiating the proceeding to request legal assistance from the competent office for actions outside its district.

AbR.2004.05.Nr.16 · ow (Art. 4 SchKG)

Enforcement Office Obligated to Exhaust All Avenues for Service Before Rejecting Debt Collection

Mentioned in relation to the legal assistance between debt enforcement offices when serving documents across cantons.

CPF 2014 13 · ju (Art. 4 LP)

Bank v. Bankruptcy Office: Foreign Asset Reporting and Enforcement

This article is discussed in relation to the jurisdiction of bankruptcy offices outside their district, particularly concerning mutual assistance and notification procedures.

KSK 2013 73 · gr (Art. 4 LEF)

Tax Debtor Liable for Execution Costs Despite Claim of Insufficient Notice

Cited regarding the mandatory procedure for cross-cantonal service of enforcement documents (rogatory commission).

A/2611/2012 · ge (art. 4 al. 1 LP)

Debt Enforcement Office v. Counterpart Office: Unjustified Delay in Intercantonal Assistance

Cited as the legal basis establishing the standing of the Bern office to complain about the delay in its assistance request.

A/2609/2012 · ge (Art. 4 LP)

Annulment of Edictal Notification and Asset Seizure Due to Improper Service Procedures

Cited in the final orders, instructing the Office to proceed with delegation to the Valais enforcement office if necessary for the new notification.