Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
281.1 SCHKGLPLEF CH

Art. 334 Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF)

LEF; Titolo undecimo: Della procedura concordataria; VI. Dell’appuramento bonale dei debiti mediante trattative private; 2. Moratoria. Nomina di un commissario
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (404 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 334 LEF

Se l’appuramento bonale dei debiti non appare escluso già di primo acchito e le spese del procedimento sono garantite, il giudice del concordato concede al debitore una moratoria di tre mesi al massimo e nomina un commissario.

Su domanda del commissario, la moratoria può essere prorogata fino a sei mesi al massimo. Inoltre, può essere revocata innanzi tempo, se l’appuramento non è manifestamente più possibile.

Durante la moratoria non si può promuovere né proseguire alcuna esecuzione contro il debitore, fatta eccezione per i contributi periodici di mantenimento o d’esistenza in virtù del diritto di famiglia. I termini previsti dagli articoli 88, 93 capoverso 2, 116 e 154 sono sospesi.

La decisione del giudice del concordato è comunicata ai creditori; l’articolo 295 c si applica per analogia.

← Art. 333 LEF Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF) Art. 335 LEF →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)

A/3744/2021 · ge (art. 334 LP)
Debtor's Appeal Against Refusal to Lift Wage Garnishment During Debt Settlement Stay
The court ordered the suspension of seizures as long as the debtor benefits from a moratorium ('sursis') under this article.
PS180220 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 2 SchKG)
Debtor v. Creditor: Futility of Debt Restructuring Due to Unreasonable Creditor Refusal
Cited as the basis for the premature revocation of the deferral when the debt settlement procedure is deemed unfeasible.
C/10643/2017 · ge (Art. 334 al. 1 LP)
Appeal Against Rejection of Amicable Debt Settlement and Lifted Execution Stay
The court upheld the first instance ruling which rejected the amicable debt settlement request because the refinancing plan appeared unlikely from the outset.
Faillite.2010.25 · vd (Art. 334 al. 2 LP)
Debtor Appeal on Settlement Commissioner Fees
The appeal was deemed admissible as it concerned a decision prolonging the stay of execution under this article.
ML.2010.33 · vd (art. 334 al. 4 LP)
Creditor Appeal of Debt Settlement Extension Revocation Inadmissible
Cited as the provision referring to appeal rules for the decision made under Article 334 LP.
15.2001.243 · ti (art. 334 LEF)
Bankrupt's Composition Proposal Timing and Creditors' Resolution Annulment
This provision is cited in the final decision's procedural summary, indicating it pertains to the grounds for the ruling which accepted the appeal and annulled the creditors' assembly decision.
14.1997.54 · ti (art. 334 cpv.1 LEF)
Appellant Debt Settlement Denial Upheld Due to Procedural Cost Guarantee Failure
This provision mandates that procedural costs must be anticipated or guaranteed for the moratorium to be granted, which was the basis for rejecting the appeal.
14.2013.116 · ti (Art. 334 cpv. 2 LEF)
Commissioner's Appeal of Denied Moratorium Extension Inadmissible Due to Lack of Standing
This provision was cited by the lower court when rejecting the request for an extension of the moratorium, although the appeal was judged inadmissible on other grounds.
15.2001.243 · ti (art. 334 LEF)
Bankruptcy Composition Proposal Review Period Denial
This article is cited in the preamble to the operative part and likely justifies the Tribunal's ability to rule on the appeal concerning the annulment of the creditors' meeting decision.
PS150184 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 1 und 2 SchKG)
Revocation of Standstill Upon Failure of Consensual Private Restructuring Pending New Composition Proceeding
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for prematurely revoking the standstill.
PS180220 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 2 SchKG)
Revocation of Composition Moratorium Based on Creditor's Refusal to Negotiate
The appeal was dismissed, justifying the prior revocation of the stay of proceedings based on this article.
PS240242 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 4 SchKG i.V.m. Art. 295c Abs. 1 SchKG)
Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing in Debt Settlement Execution
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the appeal in this matter, although the decision not to proceed was based on timeliness.