281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 332 Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF)
LEF; Titolo undecimo: Della procedura concordataria; V. Del concordato nella procedura di fallimento
Art. 332 LEF
Il debitore o un creditore può proporre un concordato. In tal caso, l’amministrazione del fallimento lo sottopone col proprio parere ai creditori, i quali deliberano sul medesimo al più presto nella seconda assemblea.
Gli articoli 302 a 307 e 310 a 331 si applicano per analogia. Tuttavia le funzioni del commissario spettano all’amministrazione del fallimento. La realizzazione è sospesa sino a decisione del giudice del concordato sull’omologazione.
La decisione sul concordato è comunicata all’amministrazione, la quale, in caso di omologazione, propone al giudice la rivocazione del fallimento.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (18)
102 2018 228 · fr (Art. 332 SchKG)
Appeal of Bankruptcy Order Confirmation Due to Insufficient Solvency Proof
The court referenced this article when advising the debtor on proposing a composition agreement to revoke the bankruptcy.
BEZ.2018.53 · bs (Art. 332 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Proceedings Dismissed Due to Insufficient Solvency
Cited when explaining why the court cannot rule on the subsidiary request for granting a composition moratorium (Nachlassstundung).
14.2017.200 · ti (Art. 332 LEF)
Debtor Fails to Fund Procedural Costs, Leading to Concordat Revocation and Bankruptcy Declaration
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis allowing the approval of a composition agreement (concordato) during bankruptcy proceedings, implying it is the potential remedy if the appeal were successful.
102 2017 203 · fr (Art. 332 SchKG)
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Order for Failure to Meet Annulment Requirements
Mentioned in the context of the debtor's option to propose a composition agreement to potentially revoke the bankruptcy.
102 2017 134 · fr (Art. 332 SchKG)
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Solvency
Cited to inform the appellant about the possibility of applying for the revocation of the bankruptcy if a composition agreement is reached.
102 2016 64 · fr (Art. 332 SchKG)
Debtor Fails to Prove Solvency Against Bankruptcy Initiation
Mentioned in the reasoning as the procedure available to the debtor if a composition agreement is reached, but not directly applied in the final orders.
102 2015 213 · fr (Art. 332 SchKG)
Appeal of Bankruptcy Order Dismissed for Untimely Filing
This provision was mentioned in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive regarding the possibility of proposing a composition agreement, but it is not cited in the final orders (I, II, or III).
102 2015 93 · fr (Art. 332 SchKG)
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Prove Debt Payment or Solvency in Bankruptcy Challenge
The appellant is advised that he can propose a composition with creditors and request the revocation of the bankruptcy under this article if the composition is accepted.
ZK2 2010 30 · gr (art. 332 LEF)
Cessionary Claim Subject to Original Contractor Defenses
Cited in the reasoning regarding the consequences of the composition agreement on the claim.
ZK2 2010 30 · gr (art. 332 cpv. 2 in relazione con l‘art. 314 cpv. 1 LEF)
Cessionary Claim Subject to Original Contractor Defenses
Cited during the reasoning concerning the extinction of the principal claim against B. due to the composition agreement (concordato), supporting the separation of the claims.
A/4207/2009 · ge (Art. 332 LP)
Supervisory Commission Complaint Against Bankruptcy Office Closure Inadmissible
Cited in the reasoning section to explain the requirements for proposing a composition agreement after bankruptcy.
KG090021 · zh (Art. 332 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Multiple Representation in Insolvency and Composition Proceedings: Conflict of Interest Analysis
Cited in the reasoning regarding the debtor's right to propose a composition agreement (Konstellation 2).
14.2009.64 · ti (art. 332 LEF)
Debtor's Appeal Regarding Contested Claim Litigation Deadline in Composition Approval
Cited in the final grounds for decision, relating to the concordat procedure following bankruptcy.
RBOG.2005.Nr.25 · tg (Art. 332 SchKG)
Timeliness of Creditors' Arrangement Proposal After Closure Decision in Bankruptcy
This provision governs the rules for proposing a composition agreement (Nachlassvertrag) during bankruptcy, which is central to the dispute.
OG ARGVP 2002 3416 · ar (Art. 332 SchKG)
Improper Fund Withholding and Summary Bankruptcy Proceedings
Cited in the context of the possibility of proposing a composition agreement in bankruptcy.