281.1 SCHKGLPLEF

CH

Art. 111 Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF)

LEF; Titolo terzo: Della esecuzione in via di pignoramento; I. Del pignoramento; F. Partecipazione al pignoramento; 2. Partecipazione privilegiata

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (404 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 111 LEF

Hanno diritto di partecipare, senza preventiva esecuzione, al pignoramento durante quaranta giorni a contare dall’esecuzione del pignoramento: 1. il coniuge o il partner registrato del debitore; 2. i figli del debitore per i crediti inerenti ai rapporti con i genitori e le persone maggiorenni per i crediti derivanti da un mandato precauzionale (art. 360–369 CC ); 3. i figli maggiorenni e gli abiatici del debitore per i crediti fondati sugli articoli 334 e 334 bis CC ; 4. il costituente di un contratto di vitalizio per i crediti fondati sull’articolo 529 CO .

Le persone di cui al capoverso 1 numeri 1 e 2 possono esercitare tale diritto soltanto se il pignoramento è avvenuto durante il matrimonio, l’unione domestica registrata, l’autorità parentale o l’efficacia del mandato precauzionale, oppure nel termine di un anno dopo la loro fine; la durata di un processo o di un procedimento esecutivo non viene computata. Per i minorenni o le persone sottoposte a una misura di protezione degli adulti la dichiarazione di partecipazione al pignoramento può essere fatta anche dall’autorità di protezione dei minori e da quella di protezione degli adulti.

In quanto da esso conosciuti, l’ufficio d’esecuzione informa, con lettera semplice, gli aventi diritto di partecipazione al pignoramento.

L’ufficio d’esecuzione dà avviso della domanda di partecipazione al debitore e ai creditori, impartendo loro un termine di dieci giorni per contestarla.

Se viene contestata, la partecipazione è ammessa soltanto con gli effetti di un pignoramento provvisorio, e l’istante deve promuovere l’azione entro venti giorni al luogo dell’esecuzione; trascorso infruttuosamente il termine, la sua partecipazione è caduca. ...

← Art. 110 LEF Legge federale dell'11 aprile 1889 sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento (LEF) Art. 112 LEF →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (21)

ZK 2013 188 · be (Art. 111 SchKG)

Ancillary Action Procedural Type and Advance on Costs under Swiss Debt Collection Act

Cited as the subject matter for which the court determined the applicable procedure (Anschlussklage).

BGE 138 III 145 (Art. 111 SchKG)

Subrogation under Art. 289 Abs. 2 ZGB transfers to the advancing public entity the child support creditor's right to privileged attachment joinder under Art. 111 SchKG.

Main ground for the decision: held that privileged joinder to an attachment is available to a public entity subrogated to child maintenance claims.

ZSU.2024.231 · ag (Art. 111 Abs. 1 SchKG)

Creditor's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Address Lower Court's Reasoning on Lack of Valid Title for Provisional Execution

Used to offset the court costs against the advance payment made by the appellant.

C/7541/2021 · ge (Art. 111 al. 1 LP)

State's Appeal on Privileged Participation in Child Support Seizure Dismissed

The final order rejects the appeal, implicitly confirming the lower court's finding that the main ground for not admitting the privileged participation was not met (i.e., the conditions under Art. 111 al. 1 LP were not satisfied in this specific context, as detailed in the reasoning).

RT210170 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. 3 SchKG)

Alimony Enforcement Appeal Dismissed on Procedural Grounds

Although listed in the applicant's initial demands (Urk. 21, Point 1), this provision was not used in the final dispositive orders.

C/15694/2020 · ge (art. 111 LP)

Government Entity's Right to Privileged Participation in Seizure Following Spousal Maintenance Claim Cession

The main issue was the right of the SCARPA to privileged participation in the seizure, based on this article, which was admitted in the final orders.

KSK 2021 1 · gr (Art. 111 Abs. 1 und 2 SchKG)

Appeal Regarding Supplementary Attachment for Support Claims vs. Procedural Legality Review

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to contest the privileged attachment notice within the statutory period, as required by this article regarding the substantive basis of the attachment.

93/2004/17 · sh (Art. 111 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 und Abs. 2 SchKG)

Provisional Legal Cost Contribution in Divorce Proceedings and Privileged Joinder to Seizure

This provision is cited as the legal basis allowing the spouse to join an existing attachment proceeding for a claim between spouses (the advance for litigation costs).

A/4435/2019 · ge (Art. 111 al. 3 LP)

Children's Claim for Restitution of Seizure Participation Deadline Denied Despite Enforcement Office's Failure to Notify

The court found that the Office failed in its duty to notify the creditors of their right to participate in the seizure, as required by this article.

ABS 2013 117 · be (Art. 111 Abs. 4 SchKG)

Supervisory Review of Refusal to Allow Privileged Attachment Accession Based on Bankruptcy Loss Certificate

The court ordered the authority to notify the debtor and creditors of the request for joining the attachment and set a ten-day deadline for objection.

ABS 2013 117 · be (Art. 111 SchKG)

Supervisory Review of Refusal to Allow Privileged Attachment Accession Based on Bankruptcy Loss Certificate

The appeal was granted, resulting in the annulment of the challenged decision regarding the privileged attachment joinder based on Art. 111 SchKG.

A/58/2013 · ge (art. 111 LP)

State Agency v. Enforcement Office Regarding Child Support Collection Delays

Cited in the reasoning section regarding provisional distribution, but not explicitly in the final orders as a basis for the decision itself.

PS110070 · zh (Art. 111 SchKG)

Municipality v. Debt Collection Office on Privileged Joinder for Spousal Maintenance Arrears

The court's decision to uphold the appeal is based on the substantive rules regarding privileged attachment claims, as implied by the annulment of the administrative decisions concerning this claim.

Plainte.2009.38 · vd (art. 111 LP)

Creditor Challenge to Distribution Schedule Interest Rate and Proper Venue

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the scope of the office's examination, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

AP.2009.120 · vd (Art. 111 al. 1 ch. 1 LP)

Spousal Debt Recognition and Lien Challenge

This provision was cited in the lower court's decision regarding the privileged nature of the claim, which was partially upheld by the appeal court.