273
BZPPCFPC
CH
CH
Art. 57 Legge del 4 dicembre 1947 di procedura civile federale (PC)
PC; Titolo settimo: Prova; 2. Mezzi di prova; d. Periti; Compiti
Art. 57 PC
Quando, per chiarire le circostanze di una causa, è necessaria un’indagine che richiede cognizioni speciali, il giudice si fa assistere da uno o più periti, i quali partecipano all’istruttoria della causa nella misura da lui stabilita e danno il proprio parere sulle questioni loro sottoposte.
Il giudice dà possibilità alle parti di esprimersi sulle questioni sottoposte ai periti e di proporre modificazioni ed aggiunte ad esse.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (32)
JAAC 64.6 (Art. 57 BZP)
Rejection of Private Expert Report on Post-Traumatic Syndrome Due to Lack of Independence and Insufficient Evidence
Used to determine the probative value of private medical reports in asylum proceedings.
A-2871/2024 (Art. 57 Abs. 2 BZP)
Accessibility of Double-Decker Train Ramps for Wheelchair Users
Allows parties to comment on questions to be submitted to an expert and to propose amendments or additions.
A-5669/2024 (Art. 57ss PCF)
Federal Administrative Court: Internal Appeal Required for Medical Reassessment
Cited as applicable by reference for the procedure regarding the appointment and role of an expert.
B-2285/2024 (Art. 57 al. 2 PCF)
Recognition of Foreign Osteopathy Diploma - Compensation Measures Ordered
Specifies the right of parties to comment on questions posed to experts.
B-2285/2024 (Art. 57 ss PCF)
Recognition of Foreign Osteopathy Diploma - Compensation Measures Ordered
Provisions of the Swiss Civil Procedure Code concerning expert opinions.
E-5686/2019 (Art. 57 ff. BZP)
Asylum Claim Rejection Upheld Due to Credibility Issues and Insufficient Evidence
Defines the legal nature of an expert opinion, in conjunction with VwVG.
IV.2019.91 · sg (Art. 57 BZP)
Claimant Denied Disability Benefits for Failure to Complete Waiting Period Before Old-Age Pension Commencement
Cited in the reasoning concerning procedural rights regarding questions, but not directly cited in the operative orders.
B-4545/2010 (Art. 57 al. 1 PCF)
Training Company v. Canton and Confederation: Contract Dispute Over Subsidies
Procedural rule governing the use of experts in legal proceedings.
RR.2019.296 (Art. 57 e segg. PCF)
Extradition to Argentina Blocked Due to Health Concerns
Cited as provisions to be considered for the participation rights of the parties in the drafting of the medical expert opinion.
C-1470/2016 (Art. 57 al. 2 PCF)
Applicant Denied Disability Benefits and Vocational Rehabilitation Due to Insufficient Disability Rate
References the possibility for the insured to comment on questions posed to experts.
E-3503/2017 (Art. 57 ff. BZP)
Asylum claim dismissed due to lack of credibility and inconsistent statements.
Provisions on expert opinions in the Federal Civil Procedure Code.
IV.2017.00318 · zh (Art. 57 Abs. 2 BZP)
Disability Benefits Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Impairment
Grants parties the opportunity to comment on expert opinions and make requests.
B-5446/2015 (Art. 57 al. 2, 58 al. 2 et 60 PCF)
Psychologist's Foreign Distance Learning Degree Denied Recognition Due to Lack of Practical Training
Provisions of the Swiss Code of Civil Procedure regarding expert opinions and the right of parties to participate in their formation.
B-7216/2014 (Art. 57 ff. BZP)
Public Procurement: Tunnel Construction Contract Award Upheld
Cited in conjunction with VwVG regarding expert opinions and party rights.
E-1302/2016 (Art. 57 61 BZP)
Tibetan Asylum Seeker Deportation Upheld Due to Lack of Credibility and Exile Community Ties
Cited in relation to the classification of the LINGUA analysis.