Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 99 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Cauzione per le spese ripetibili

CPC; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo ottavo: Spese giudiziarie e gratuito patrocinio; Capitolo 1: Spese giudiziarie
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (426 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 99 CPC · Cauzione per le spese ripetibili

Su richiesta del convenuto, l’attore deve prestare cauzione per le spese ripetibili se: a. non ha domicilio o sede in Svizzera; b. risulta insolvente, segnatamente se nei suoi confronti è stato dichiarato il fallimento o è in corso una procedura concordataria o a suo carico vi sono attestati di carenza beni; c. è ancora debitore delle spese giudiziarie relative a una precedente procedura; oppure d. per altri motivi il pagamento delle ripetibili risulta seriamente compromesso.

In caso di litisconsorzio necessario occorre prestare cauzione solo se tutti i litisconsorti si trovano in una delle situazioni di cui al capoverso 1.

Non vi è obbligo di prestare cauzione: a. nella procedura semplificata, tranne nelle controversie patrimoniali secondo l’articolo 243 capoverso 1; b. nella procedura di divorzio; c. nella procedura sommaria, eccettuata la tutela giurisdizionale nei casi manifesti (art. 257); d. nella procedura relativa a una controversia secondo la LPD .

← Art. 98 CPC Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Oggetto Art. 100 CPC →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (612)

VVGE.1981.82.Nr.52 · ow (Art. 99 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Compulsory Placement Legal Aid Jurisdiction
Applied by analogy to determine the jurisdiction in administrative court proceedings.
AbR.1980.81.Nr.17 · ow (Art. 99 Abs. 4 ZPO)
Opposing Party Status in Legal Aid Appeals
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of an appeal against the denial or withdrawal of legal aid, but ultimately found not applicable to the opposing party in this specific context.
ZK 2014 262 · be (Art. 99 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)
Security for Party Costs Following Withdrawal and Refiling of Lawsuit
This provision establishes the basis (security for party costs due to outstanding costs from a previous proceeding) for obliging the claimant to provide security.
O2025-005 (Art. 99 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO)
Security for Costs in Foreign Plaintiff Cases
This provision mandates the plaintiff to provide security for the defendant's party costs if the plaintiff has no domicile or seat in Switzerland, which was the basis for ordering security.
O2025-005 (Art. 99 ZPO)
Security for Costs in Foreign Plaintiff Cases
The court interpreted this article regarding the timing and scope of security for party costs, influencing the final order on the amount and deadline.
C/15061/2024 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Security for Costs in Cross-Border Appeal
The general basis for the obligation to provide security, although applied in the context of the appeal procedure.
C/2327/2022 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Revision Security for Costs Determination
The court applied the rule concerning the requirement to provide security for costs based on the debtor being liable for prior procedure costs.
C/26061/2013 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Security for Costs on Appeal Following Relocation Abroad
This provision established the ground for accepting the request for security for costs because the defendant no longer had domicile in Switzerland.
C/29498/2018 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Security for Appeal Costs of Foreign Appellant
This article was the basis for finding the request for security for costs admissible.
C/20324/2023 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 let. d CPC)
Security for Costs in Unfair Competition Claim Denied Despite Financial Distress Allegations
The court rejected the request for security for costs because the conditions set out in this general clause were not met.
C/6552/2013 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Irish Company Ordered to Post Security for Appeal Costs
Cited as the legal basis for requiring a party without domicile or seat in Switzerland to provide security for costs.
C/8099/2022 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Respondent Ordered to Provide Security for Costs Despite Hague Convention Claim
The court ordered the defendant to provide security for costs based on the applicant's lack of established domicile in Switzerland.
C/8099/2022 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 let. d CPC)
Respondent Ordered to Provide Security for Costs Despite Hague Convention Claim
The court considered that the unknown domicile of the defendant created a considerable risk that costs would not be paid.
C/14053/2021 · ge (Art. 99 al. 1 CPC)
Appellant's Obligation to Post Security for Costs Despite Claim of Spanish Domicile
The court used this article as the primary legal basis for granting the request for security for costs based on the appellant not having domicile in Switzerland.
C/4633/2022 · ge (art. 99 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Security for Costs for Foreign Appellant Owning Local Property
The underlying legal basis for ordering the security for costs, although not explicitly repeated in the final operative part, is linked to the main procedural action ordered.