272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 85 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Azione creditoria senza quantificazione del valore litigioso

CPC; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo sesto: Azioni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (426 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 85 CPC · Azione creditoria senza quantificazione del valore litigioso

Se non è possibile o non si può ragionevolmente esigere che l’entità della pretesa sia precisata già all’inizio del processo, l’attore può promuovere un’azione creditoria senza quantificare il valore litigioso. Deve tuttavia indicare un valore minimo quale valore litigioso provvisorio.

Dopo l’assunzione delle prove o dopo che le parti o terzi hanno fornito informazioni in merito, il giudice impartisce alle parti un termine per precisare l’entità della pretesa. Il giudice adito rimane competente anche se il valore litigioso eccede la sua competenza per materia.

← Art. 84 CPC Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Oggetto Art. 86 CPC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (250)

RBOG.2009.Nr.28 · tg (§ 85 Abs. 4 ZPO)

Indigent Litigant's Liability for Opposing Counsel Fees Despite Free Legal Aid

Cited as a legal basis establishing that party compensation cannot be imposed on the state, supporting the argument against exemption from paying the opponent's costs.

C/10996/2022 · ge (art. 85 al. 1 CPC)

Landlords' Appeal Inadmissible Due to Procedural Deficiencies in Rent Dispute

Cited in relation to unquantified conclusions in the appeal, which were deemed inadmissible because the conditions for non-quantified claims were not met.

608 2023 158 · fr (Art. 85 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Pension Contribution Dispute Under GAV FAR: Jurisdiction and Scope of Application

Cited in the reasoning concerning the admissibility of the action despite the lack of specified claim amounts, although the court ultimately deemed the minimum value requirement unnecessary for this specific procedure (Art. 73 BVG).

A/850/2025 · ge (Art. 85 al. 1 CPC)

Insured v. Insurer (Failure to Quantify Initial Claim)

The applicant failed to justify why they could not quantify the claim initially and provide a provisional value, as required by this provision for unquantified claims.

36.2025.19 · ti (art. 85 cpv. 1 CPC)

Insured's Action for Declaration and Annulment of Benefit Termination Deemed Inadmissible for Failure to Quantify Monetary Claim

Cited concerning the exception to the quantification requirement, the absence of which (justification) contributed to the inadmissibility.

ZKBER.2025.17 · so (Art. 85 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Husband v. Wife: Provisional Spousal Support Quantification Waiver

Although mentioned in the reasoning regarding the principle of disposition, this article was not explicitly cited in the final orders.

C/3735/2025 · ge (art. 85 et 88 CPC)

Sole Proprietor v. Association Regarding Trademark Transfer and Provisional Measures

Cited in the dispositive to justify the award of legal fees (dépens) to the successful party.

C/28528/2024 · ge (art. 85 et 88 CPC)

Employer v. Former Employee: Provisional Measures Granted for Misappropriation of Client Data

Cited in support of ordering the reimbursement of costs to the applicant.

HG190052 · zh (Art. 85 Abs. 2 ZPO)

Sale Price Dispute Regarding Online Marketing Business Revenue Share

Cited in the reasoning to establish the time when the plaintiff had to finalize the claim amount.

FO.2022.23.K2 · sg (Art. 85 ZPO)

Child Support Calculation and Allocation Based on Disability Income and Earning Capacity Disparity

Used to justify the admissibility of the appeal despite unquantified claims regarding child support.

NG240018 · zh (Art. 85 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Rent Reduction Claim Insufficiently Justified

Used to establish that an unquantified claim must be justified as an exception in the statement of claim.

MJ240053.L · zh (Art. 85 ZPO)

Tenant Challenge to Rent Increase and Unquantified Rent Reduction Dismissed

Cited in the final section regarding the exceptional allowance of unquantified claims (unbezifferte Klage).

A/2523/2024 · ge (art. 85 al. 1 CPC)

Disability Benefits Claim Inadmissible for Lack of Monetary Specification

The applicant failed to meet the conditions for filing a non-quantified action by not indicating a provisional minimum litigation value.

C/8931/2022 · ge (art. 85 CPC)

Late Quantification of Lost Earnings Claim Upheld

Cited in reasoning to address the rule for quantifying the claim when the exact amount is not yet known, which was the basis for the lower court's decision.

12.2024.69 · ti (art. 85 CPC)

Physician's Claim for Variable Remuneration Dismissed Due to Insufficient Quantification and Evidentiary Deficiencies

The first instance judge deemed the petition inadmissible due to the appellant's failure to quantify the claim in the concluding submissions, as required by this procedural rule for the specified action.