Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
272 ZPOCPC CH

Art. 393 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Motivi di ricorso

CPC; Parte terza: Arbitrato; Titolo settimo: Mezzi d’impugnazione; Capitolo 1: Ricorso
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (426 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 393 CPC · Motivi di ricorso

Il lodo può essere impugnato unicamente se: a. l’arbitro unico è stato designato irregolarmente oppure il tribunale arbitrale è stato costituito irregolarmente; b. il tribunale arbitrale si è dichiarato, a torto, competente o incompetente; c. il tribunale arbitrale ha deciso punti litigiosi che non gli erano stati sottoposti o ha omesso di giudicare determinate conclusioni; d. è stato violato il principio della parità di trattamento delle parti o il loro diritto di essere sentite; e. è arbitrario nel suo esito perché si fonda su accertamenti di fatto palesemente in contrasto con gli atti oppure su una manifesta violazione del diritto o dell’equità; f. le indennità e le spese degli arbitri, fissate dal tribunale arbitrale, sono manifestamente eccessive.

← Art. 392 CPC Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Oggetto Art. 394 CPC →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (44)

ZK 2015 528 · be (Art. 393 lit. a ZPO)
Annulment of Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator Partiality and Jurisdictional Clarification
Cited in the dispositive section to justify that the party could directly challenge the award based on the improper composition of the arbitral tribunal after learning of the ground during the appeal period.
4A_237/2026 (Art. 393 lit. b ZPO)
WhatsApp exchange of invoices with arbitration clause in attachments and "Key Terms" held insufficient to conclude post-contractual arbitration agreement excluding state jurisdiction
Main ground for the verdict: the Court annulled the arbitral award and declared the sole arbitrator lacked jurisdiction.
4A_264/2026 (Art. 393 let. d CPC)
Swiss sports arbitration: footballer's challenge to closure of ethics investigation barred by failure to name club as co-respondent and by lack of appeal route for abuse findings.
Ground for rejecting the appeal because the alleged violation of the right to be heard was not established.
4A_264/2026 (Art. 393 let. e CPC)
Swiss sports arbitration: footballer's challenge to closure of ethics investigation barred by failure to name club as co-respondent and by lack of appeal route for abuse findings.
Ground for rejecting the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate arbitrariness in the result of the challenged award.
4A_77/2026 (Art. 393 lit. b ZPO)
Arbitration clause in federation statutes held inapplicable to club trainer where club's static reference to federation rules predated introduction of CAS jurisdiction.
Ground for the appeal, invoked to challenge the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction.
12.2024.44 · ti (art. 393 lett. e CPC)
Appeal Regarding Invalid Employment Termination Due to Lack of Joint Signature Authority
The appeal was rejected because the outcome of the arbitral award was not deemed arbitrary under this provision.
ARMP.2023.108 · ne (art. 393 al. 1 CPC)
Restoration of Opposition Deadline Due to Post-Assault Shock
Cited in the reasoning regarding the basis for appeal against public prosecutor's decisions, although the actual ground for admission is procedural.
502 2020 77 · fr (Art. 393 al. 1 CPC)
Minor's Appeal Against Dismissal of Sexual Abuse Allegations and Legal Aid Refusal
Cited as procedural basis confirming that an appeal is open against the refusal to appoint free counsel.
ARMP.2020.91 · ne (Art. 393 al. 1 let. a CPC)
Prosecutor v. Defendant (Seizure Maintenance Appeal)
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeals were lodged within the legal form and deadline.
C/19964/2018 · ge (art. 393 let. e CPC)
Appeal of Reduced Penalty for Salary and Benefit Violations Upheld
The ground for challenging the arbitral award regarding the application of conventional penalties.
SG.2019.1 · sg (Art. 393 lit. a ZPO)
Application to Remove Arbitration Chairman Denied Due to Procedural Delays
Cited as the legal basis for challenging this removal decision indirectly via an appeal against the subsequent arbitral award due to improper composition of the arbitral tribunal.
SG.2019.1 · sg (Art. 393 lit. a ZPO)
Application to Remove Arbitration Chairperson Dismissed Amidst Procedural Delays
This provision is cited regarding the indirect appeal route against the decision on removal.
C2 17 7 · vs (Art. 393 lit. c ZPO)
Appeal Against Arbitral Award Dismissing Price Reduction Claim and Upholding Counterclaim for Purchase Price
Mentioned extensively in the reasoning regarding the review of arbitral awards based on failure to rule on claims (infra petita), although the claim was rejected.
C2 17 7 · vs (Art. 393 lit. e ZPO)
Appeal Against Arbitral Award Dismissing Price Reduction Claim and Upholding Counterclaim for Purchase Price
Mentioned extensively in the reasoning regarding the review of arbitral awards based on evident unreasonableness, although the appeal was ultimately dismissed.
PG170002 · zh (Art. 392 i.V.m. Art. 393 lit. a ZPO)
Challenge to Arbitral Secretariat Official Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning concerning the appealability of the decision, but not explicitly in the final orders.