272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 374 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Provvedimenti cautelari, garanzie e risarcimento dei danni

CPC; Parte terza: Arbitrato; Titolo quinto: Procedimento arbitrale

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (426 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 374 CPC · Provvedimenti cautelari, garanzie e risarcimento dei danni

Il tribunale statale o, salvo diversa pattuizione delle parti, il tribunale arbitrale può, ad istanza di parte, ordinare provvedimenti cautelari, compresi quelli per assicurare i mezzi di prova.

Se la parte contro cui è ordinato il provvedimento del tribunale arbitrale non vi si sottopone spontaneamente, il tribunale statale, su richiesta del tribunale arbitrale o ad istanza di parte, prende le necessarie disposizioni.

Se vi è da temere un danno per l’altra parte, il tribunale arbitrale o statale può subordinare i provvedimenti cautelari alla prestazione di garanzie.

La parte instante risponde del danno causato da un provvedimento cautelare ingiustificato. Tuttavia, se essa prova di aver presentato l’istanza in buona fede, il tribunale arbitrale o statale può ridurre o escludere il risarcimento. La parte lesa può far valere la sua pretesa nel procedimento arbitrale pendente.

La garanzia è liberata se è certo che non è promossa alcuna azione di risarcimento del danno; se vi è incertezza in proposito, il tribunale arbitrale assegna un termine per proporre l’azione.

← Art. 373 CPC Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Oggetto Art. 375 CPC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)

ZK 2008 452 · be (Art. 374 Ziff. 1 ZPO)

Negative Declaration Action During Appeal of Provisional Legal Opening Decision

The appeal was granted because the lower court's decision to reject the conciliation request constituted a qualified error and a de facto denial of justice, which is challengeable under this provision.

C1 24 62 · vs (Art. 374 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Football Association Registration Ban Appeal and Jurisdiction over Provisional Measures

The provision whose interpretation regarding the parallel jurisdiction of state courts and arbitration courts was central to the decision to uphold the lack of jurisdiction.

ZK 2012 111 · be (Art. 374 ZPO)

Sports Organization v. Football Association on Preliminary Injunction and Forfeiture of Arbitration Rights

The admissibility of the state court's jurisdiction for provisional measures in arbitration proceedings was assessed under this article, although ultimately the specific dismissal relied on other grounds.

MPP.2011.1 · vd (art. 13, 61, 265 et 374 CPC)

Football Association Exclusion and Abuse of Dominant Position

Cited in the preamble ('vu'), but not explicitly in the final operative part (dispositive orders I-VIII), except for Art. 265 implicitly covered by the nature of the order.

MPP.2011.1 · vd (art. 374 CPC)

Football Association Exclusion and Abuse of Dominant Position

Cited in the preamble ('vu'), but not explicitly in the final operative part (dispositive orders I-VIII).

ZK 2008 520 · be (Art. 374 Ziff. 1 ZPO)

Attorney Diligence in Sole Practice Regarding Procedural Deadlines

The appeal was dismissed because the challenged decision was found not to be arbitrary under this provision.

11.2003.161 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Possessory Action Dismissed Pending Resolution of Scope of Registered Right-of-Way in Principal Action

Cited in reasoning (Considerando 1) as the provision referring possessory actions to the summary contentious procedure.

11.2003.78 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Right of Way Possessory Action Over Obstruction of Heavy Vehicle Access

Cited in reasoning regarding the summary nature of possessory procedure, which is relevant to the decision on the merits within the context of the appeal.

11.2002.43 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Property Owner v. Neighbor: Obstruction of Pedestrian Right of Way

Cited in the reasoning (Considerando 1) as the procedural rule that refers the possessory action to the procedure outlined in Art. 361 ff. CPC.

11.2002.78 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Recusal Denial for Alleged Judicial Bias and Procedural Disagreement

Cited in comparison to explain the usual duration of summary proceedings.

11.1999.101 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Adjoining Owners v. Defendant Regarding Unlawful Window Placement and Costs

Cited to characterize the possessory action as summary in nature.

11.1996.119 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Municipality v. Neighboring Property Owners: Precautionary Expert Assessment Denied Due to Delay and Completion of Work

Cited in the reasoning as the provision referring to the appealability rules applicable to the possessory action.

11.2002.43 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Possessory Action Regarding Pedestrian Servitude Obstruction and Thuja Hedge Maintenance

Cited (point 1) as the rule referring to articles 361 CPC regarding possessory actions procedure.

11.2003.78 · ti (art. 374 CPC)

Possessory Action Over Obstruction of Vehicular Right of Way

Cited in the reasoning regarding the summary nature of the possessory procedure.