272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 347 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Esecutività

CPC; Parte seconda: Disposizioni speciali; Titolo decimo: Esecuzione; Capitolo 2: Esecuzione di documenti pubblici

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (426 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 347 CPC · Esecutività

Un documento pubblico avente per oggetto prestazioni di qualsiasi genere può essere eseguito alla stregua di una decisione giudiziaria se: a. l’obbligato ha espressamente dichiarato nel documento di riconoscere l’esecuzione diretta della prestazione; b. il titolo giuridico della prestazione dovuta è menzionato nel documento; c. la prestazione dovuta: 1. è sufficientemente determinata nel documento, 2. è riconosciuta nel documento dall’obbligato, e 3. è esigibile.

← Art. 346 CPC Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Oggetto Art. 348 CPC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (19)

C/16174/2025 · ge (art. 347 CPC)

Foundation v. Debtor (Debt Seizure Appeal)

Cited in the reasoning when discussing the requirements for an authentic document to be directly enforceable.

VB240004 · zh (Art. 347 f. ZPO)

Enforceability of Eviction Order Affirmed Despite Administrative Appeal

Cited in the reasoning to clarify that these provisions are not applicable here, supporting the decision to dismiss the appeal.

BZ 2023 4 · zg (Art. 347 ZPO)

Pledge Enforcement on Shares Despite Cancellation and Jurisdictional Challenge

The requirements for an enforceable public document under Art. 347 ZPO were analyzed and found to be met for granting definitive legal opening.

LF220012 · zh (Art. 347 lit. a ZPO)

Seller's Appeal Dismissed Due to Settlement Agreement on Real Estate Transfer

Cited by the parties in their settlement agreement regarding direct enforcement of the eviction clause.

C/22689/2019 · ge (Art. 347 CPC)

Opposition to Payment Order Based on Notarial Deeds as Direct Execution Titles

The court implicitly uses this provision by concluding that the authentic titles do not meet its requirements (specifically art. 347 let. b CPC) for definitive lifting of opposition.

ARMC.2020.31 · ne (Art. 347 CPC)

Creditor v. Debtor: Independent Guarantee vs. Suretyship Formal Requirements

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirements for an authentic title to be enforceable, which was central to the decision on the validity of the enforcement title.

ZK.2018.6 · bs (Art. 347 ZPO)

Trademark Dispute Settlement and Discontinuance

Cited in the parties' agreement (which the court adopts) as the provision under which the settlement agreement serves as a final title for legal execution.

14.2018.93 · ti (Art. 347 CPC)

Appellant v. Respondents (Asset Seizure for Unreturned Property Advance)

Mentioned in the reasoning explaining why the deeds qualify as executive titles under Art. 80 LEF, but not explicitly cited in the numbered orders.

ARMC.2017.25 · ne (Art. 347 à 352 CPC)

Appeal Dismissed: Lifting of Opposition to Tax Payment Orders

This provision is mentioned in the context of Art. 80 LP footnotes, but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

ML.2017.67 · vd (Art. 347 CPC)

Creditor Opposition to Debt Collection Order Based on Notarial Deed Subject to Foreign Law

This article was used to confirm that the authentic title met the formal requirements for direct enforceability, which served as the basis for granting the final lifting of opposition.

C/23158/2014 · ge (Art. 347 CPC)

Appeal Regarding Provisional Attachment Based on Real Estate Purchase Promise Down Payment

Used to confirm that the authentic deed qualified as an enforceable title, satisfying the conditions set out in this article.

CACIV.2013.78 · ne (Art. 347 CPC)

Estate Agreement Deadline Dispute and Premature Enforcement

Cited in the reasoning to explain the significance of the executory title stipulated in the sharing agreement, which influences the exigibility of the debt.

14.2010.112 · ti (art. 347 cpv. 1 CPC)

Appeal Inadmissible Due to Untimely Filing in Rent Arrears Enforcement Case

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirements for restitution in integrum based on a criminal finding.

VBE.2007.463 · ag (§ 347 ZPO)

Revision Denied Due to Lack of New, Substantial Evidence

Establishes the competence of the court that decided the case at first instance to handle revision requests.

AGVE.2009.14 · ag (§ 347 ZPO)

Revision Denied: New Medical Report Interprets Existing Facts, Does Not Present New Evidence

Cited as the basis for determining the competent court for handling the revision application.